Dušan Vlahović (85 Viewers)

How many goals this season? All competitions.


  • Total voters
    34
  • Poll closed .

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
Gabriel Jesus 16,7m gross
Darwin Nunez 9m gross
Hojlund 5,3m gross
Lukaku 9m gross
Dovbyk 5,5m gross
Morata 8,3m gross
Nicolas Jackson 6,3m gross
Vlahovic next season will earn fucking 22m gross.
Im not saying we should get rid of him if he keeps lower salary (should be 12m gross max), but keeping him on 22m gross is fucking insane.
mbappe gross salary:

31,250,000 per year. 22 games 12 goals

vlahovic salary 22m gross 20 games 12 goals.

vlahovic is a bargain deal.
That's just a lot of flopping strikers mostly in crap teams, aside from Jackson (not sure why you included him). Roma a top club lol.
??? so juve is not a crap team at the moment? is everything going smoothly here? 6th placed team with less than 50 percent wins in league?

why other strikers get benefit of doubt of their team sucking but vlahovic doesn't? why the double standards?
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,667
yeah that's cute. that salary is outrageous indeed, still, considering all serie a players and all club competitions, vlahovic scored the most goals in 2024. not lautaro, not thuram, not cdk, not lookman, leao, lukaku or retegui, but vlahovic

also tuz is finding hard to come up with the alternatives. jonathan david seems to be the only recurring suggestion, based on some vague rumors. guy's having a good season, just like vlahovic had at fiorentina, but his per 90 numbers aren't any better. if he can keep up in a heavier jersey then i'm fine with him too, but everyone knows that the jj jersey weights differently than the lille one.

as always the reality isn't black or white. vlahovic is overpaid but a good striker. if he agrees to lower the wages then i'm fine with him, even with this infuriating conversion rate. if he won't lower his salary and extend then he'll be on the summer market, regardless of his performances
its not even that, I dont have problem with his current salary, but 22m? come on, he himself should know better its wise to negotiate a lower wages but for few more years.
For me he could still become WC striker one day and I would like to keep him, but on 7-8 m net max, 12m net is just fuckign insane, he probably would be in top10 most paid players in europe.
 

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,667
okay, i'm a bit confused, what's the 22m you're referring to and what's his current salary according to your knowledge?
currently he earns 13m gross, which is 7m net.
From next year, he is getting raise to 22m gross which is 12m net.
With this raise he is 2nd earner at Barca, City, 3rd at Real
Most paid player in clubs like Atletico, Chelsea, Arsenal,
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,957
mbappe gross salary:

31,250,000 per year. 22 games 12 goals

vlahovic salary 22m gross 20 games 12 goals.

vlahovic is a bargain deal.


??? so juve is not a crap team at the moment? is everything going smoothly here? 6th placed team with less than 50 percent wins in league?

why other strikers get benefit of doubt of their team sucking but vlahovic doesn't? why the double standards?
Who gets benefit of the doubt? Strikers who struggle get criticism everywhere, maybe you should register to all of those team's forums to get a fair and balanced view. Or do you want us to say OK we can't point out flaws in Vlahovic's game because someone somewhere is doing worse? High standards indeed.
 

Scottish

Zebrastreifenpferd
Mar 13, 2011
10,275
what are u talking about, he is below average striker who got proposed elite deal. And yes Mbappe is considered big flop at Real so far.
:lol:

Messi and Ronaldo really made everybody lose sight of where zero is when it comes to goalscoring.

- - - Updated - - -

yeah that's cute. that salary is outrageous indeed, still, considering all serie a players and all club competitions, vlahovic scored the most goals in 2024. not lautaro, not thuram, not cdk, not lookman, leao, lukaku or retegui, but vlahovic

also tuz is finding hard to come up with the alternatives. jonathan david seems to be the only recurring suggestion, based on some vague rumors. guy's having a good season, just like vlahovic had at fiorentina, but his per 90 numbers aren't any better. if he can keep up in a heavier jersey then i'm fine with him too, but everyone knows that the jj jersey weights differently than the lille one.

as always the reality isn't black or white. vlahovic is overpaid but a good striker. if he agrees to lower the wages then i'm fine with him, even with this infuriating conversion rate. if he won't lower his salary and extend then he'll be on the summer market, regardless of his performances

either way we need an other 9. i wouldn't rely on milik one bit
This exactly.

When the team finally gets some rhythm and momentum I don't doubt Vlahovic will return to his Fiorentina numbers. On a sensible salary he's a key part of this cycle.

The awful Kean suddenly comes alive when in a functioning team. That Dusan has the numbers he does in this Juventus team is remarkable by itself.
 

Scottish

Zebrastreifenpferd
Mar 13, 2011
10,275
Who gets benefit of the doubt? Strikers who struggle get criticism everywhere, maybe you should register to all of those team's forums to get a fair and balanced view. Or do you want us to say OK we can't point out flaws in Vlahovic's game because someone somewhere is doing worse? High standards indeed.
This is entirely valid, but I would say that Vlahovic's shortcomings get far more intense scrutiny than they should, and certainly more than many of those of others on the team. Meanwhile his contributions and value he brings to the team are often not recognised.
 

Scottish

Zebrastreifenpferd
Mar 13, 2011
10,275
If he leaves and joins a well-oiled machine of a team he will throw up huge numbers and we'll be kicking ourselves.

If you have a guy like Dusan Vlahovic on the team and he's not banging them in you should be considering how to fix the team, not trying to replace the goalscorer.
 

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,667
This is entirely valid, but I would say that Vlahovic's shortcomings get far more intense scrutiny than they should, and certainly more than many of those of others on the team. Meanwhile his contributions and value he brings to the team are often not recognised.
thats not true, at least for me, as i personally like him and think he is a good striker (below average was misused above, sorry i couldnt find the right word). I can see what he brings to the team and its visible that we are playing like shit with out him, but 12 m net? come on.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,711
shit, ur right, he is already at this raise - its 12m total, not 10-11m
capology and calcioefinanza list 12m net already, but some reliable journo (agresti probably, won't look up now) said during the summer that the 12m is only valid for his last season

either way it's too much, no two ways about it. no wonder the club is trying to come down to a more sustainable figure

- - - Updated - - -

If he leaves and joins a well-oiled machine of a team he will throw up huge numbers and we'll be kicking ourselves.
we'll just open a bottle of good old copium :dule:
 

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,667
capology and calcioefinanza list 12m net already, but some reliable journo (agresti probably, won't look up now) said during the summer that the 12m is only valid for his last season

either way it's too much, no two ways about it. no wonder the club is trying to come down to a more sustainable figure

- - - Updated - - -


we'll just open a bottle of good old copium :dule:
Anyway, with ammortisation of the transfer fee and this salary, his cost is around 40m for the club annually.
We really should do everything we can to renew him on lower wages...
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
If he leaves and joins a well-oiled machine of a team he will throw up huge numbers and we'll be kicking ourselves.
this happened with ronaldo. ronaldo was scoring and the excuses were the following:

he made too much money therefore the team is imbalanced
he doesn't track back

so he left and got replaced with kean lol and we saw what happened then.

by the way team is still imbalanced for every season of the 4 seasons after ronaldo left. so clearly his wages were not reason team is imbalanced but rather managerial incompetence, but yeah ronaldo and dybala where the problems.

now
 

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,667
this happened with ronaldo. ronaldo was scoring and the excuses were the following:

he made too much money therefore the team is imbalanced
he doesn't track back

so he left and got replaced with kean lol and we saw what happened then.

by the way team is still imbalanced for every season of the 4 seasons after ronaldo left. so clearly his wages were not reason team is imbalanced but rather managerial incompetence, but yeah ronaldo and dybala where the problems.

now
lets not compare Vlahovic to Ronaldo please.
 

TheLaz

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
5,537
If he leaves and joins a well-oiled machine of a team he will throw up huge numbers and we'll be kicking ourselves.

If you have a guy like Dusan Vlahovic on the team and he's not banging them in you should be considering how to fix the team, not trying to replace the goalscorer.
He's just too expensive for us at this point. I know he scores important goals but you wouldn't really know if another CF would do that as well. What I know for sure is that his output is not worth the buck we're paying him. So I say we replace him soon as we have the viable options
 

Zzak

Senior Member
Sep 11, 2014
824
did u know that with his new wages, he will earn just 1m net less than Haaland at City? Or the same wages that Salah gets at Liverpool?
He would be highest paid play in teams like Chelsea or Arsenal. Did we lost our minds by offering him such a deal?!
Not where do you get your data but Haaland is on 40 mil gross. Vlahovic is on 22mil. It's a huge gap.
 

Scottish

Zebrastreifenpferd
Mar 13, 2011
10,275
He's just too expensive for us at this point. I know he scores important goals but you wouldn't really know if another CF would do that as well. What I know for sure is that his output is not worth the buck we're paying him. So I say we replace him soon as we have the viable options
You're missing the point I'm making.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 2, Guests: 74)