Don't drop the soap nigga!!! (26 Viewers)

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,535
I think Soren Krarup has been acting weird. In the other threads he's his troll self but in here he seems to be somewhat serious.

Anyways, it's just a hunch on my part but I want people to keep it in mind.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,500
What do you mean when "no lynch was winning"? If it wasn't no lynch it would have been a C anyway (and you know it). I'd say you were actually deliberately trying hard to not look suspicious, which is suspicious :D
Its good to not be suspicious, wether you are a C or G.

And yeah it would most likely been a C, but as allways, I much prefer a lynch on the first day since it gives us something to go on in terms of players posts and votes, while no lynch just prolongs the life of one useless C who would die later anyways.
 

Hængebøffer

Senior Member
Jun 4, 2009
25,185
I think Soren Krarup has been acting weird. In the other threads he's his troll self but in here he seems to be somewhat serious.

Anyways, it's just a hunch on my part but I want people to keep it in mind.
That's true. I tried to wind people up in the previous games, since I wanted to see their reactions, but it just ended up with me becoming paranoid.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,535
Yeah, acting like that can get you lynched pretty quickly. I wonder what would ale you want to play it safer this time around.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
No lynch is never a good choice, despite the risk minimizing of it all.
Its good to not be suspicious, wether you are a C or G.

And yeah it would most likely been a C, but as allways, I much prefer a lynch on the first day since it gives us something to go on in terms of players posts and votes, while no lynch just prolongs the life of one useless C who would die later anyways.
So why didn't you write this before people started voting?
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,500
Because I'm 100% sure people wouldnt have listened, in over two dozen games, unless someone incriminates themselves in that first day, generally only seen no lynch momentum overturned like only twice, people are sheeple who want to play it safe on first day. Survival instinct partly, they figure if no one is lynched atleast I wont be put on the spot and will survive for another day for sure.
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
Because I'm 100% sure people wouldnt have listened, in over two dozen games, unless someone incriminates themselves in that first day, generally only seen no lynch momentum overturned like only twice, people are sheeple who want to play it safe on first day. Survival instinct partly, they figure if no one is lynched atleast I wont be put on the spot and will survive for another day for sure.
No lynch is generally a bad option even though C's are most likely losing a C on day 1. But since Janna was gone already and some players didn't seem to know about the game I really believe it was the best choice last night.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
Because I'm 100% sure people wouldnt have listened, in over two dozen games, unless someone incriminates themselves in that first day, generally only seen no lynch momentum overturned like only twice, people are sheeple who want to play it safe on first day. Survival instinct partly, they figure if no one is lynched atleast I wont be put on the spot and will survive for another day for sure.
Ok. Still seems strange to me that you are not at least trying to convince people to do what you think is the best solution. Especially since you decide to share the information just after the voting closes.
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
Ok. Still seems strange to me that you are not at least trying to convince people to do what you think is the best solution. Especially since you decide to share the information just after the voting closes.
Nobody will listen when a safe option such as no lynch is winning and there's no evidence against a certain player.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
Nobody will listen when a safe option such as no lynch is winning and there's no evidence against a certain player.
I get that. I'm just saying that if you are going to tell everyone that no lynch is stupid on day 1, you might as well tell it on day 1 instead of on day 2. On day 1, even if it is unlikely, it might change something, while on day 2 it's utter useless.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,976
That's a really good point. The Gs tend to get at least one of the movers and shakers and that is usually the person or persons making a majority of their decisions. who amongst that crowd is more or less likely to kill zach?

i dont believe that at all but ok
The one who whacked Zach is a woman.

My money's on Preet. She had a fight with him recently and only a woman (and Matt) is perfectly capable of sacrificing the game just to get back at Zach.
In that case, though, the others in the G squad are petty virgins who silently approved of the woman's choice.

There is no other logical explanation why they whacked Zach.
Well, unless they PMd him and he left an impression of a special role. Actually, that might have happened since he was the jailer and he probably thought that's some big deal.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
My money's on Preet. She had a fight with him recently and only a woman (and Matt) is perfectly capable of sacrificing the game just to get back at Zach.
In that case, though, the others in the G squad are petty virgins who silently approved of the woman's choice.
That sounds so easy though. Wouldn't it be more likely that they killed Zach to make Preet suspicious? Sounds like an Alen masterplan to me.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 26)