Basically this. It almost rules out Alen as evil since he would keep Zach in the game just for the fun of it. However, we can't rule out Alen entirely. Killing Zach makes no sense at all.
This. Zach's lengthy nonsensical posts where he tries to over analyze everything are great fun and he does a good job of getting on people's nerves and provoking reactions.
That's true. But still, given the limited amount of information, it would be pretty interesting to know why people are voting the way they do. That information might mean nothing now, but it could be useful later on.
That's a really good point. The Gs tend to get at least one of the movers and shakers and that is usually the person or persons making a majority of their decisions. who amongst that crowd is more or less likely to kill zach?
What do you mean when "no lynch was winning"? If it wasn't no lynch it would have been a C anyway (and you know it). I'd say you were actually deliberately trying hard to not look suspicious, which is suspicious