Does God exist? (William Lane Craig vs Peter Atkins debate) (33 Viewers)

[Quetzalcoatl]

Lies and propaganda!

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Trequartista]

Umm what? In the 1970 all the " prominent " scientist had evidence pointing to a cooling and possible new ice age. now they have evidence which points to a massive heating and melting. how didn't it change ?

With new evidences that supplement the evidences that were there before, which in turn modify and can completely change a theory, or prove that it's obsolete.

In the 1970s, the cooling of the earth was probably the best supported(by evidence) theory on that subject, which changed towards global warming with the uncovering of newer evidences in the following decades.

 

[Nzoric]

Tough boy, I bet you cry yourself to sleep every night asking yourself if there's a god or not.

Psychology major? I'd ask for a refund. When I enter a discussion with a certain degree of seriousity I expect the same from whoever I'm talking to.

 

[AndreaCristiano]

With new evidences that supplement the evidences that were there before, which in turn modify and can completely change a theory, or prove that it's obsolete.

In the 1970s, the cooling of the earth was probably the best supported(by evidence) theory on that subject, which changed towards global warming with the uncovering of newer evidences in the following decades.

Which now is climate change because the warming has been some what dismissed. in the end my point is made your evidence changes

 

[Nzoric]

Which now is climate change because the warming has been some what dismissed. in the end my point is made your evidence changes

And yet the fact remains that the environment is changing. Do you fully grasp the concept of a theory?

 

[Trequartista]

Which now is climate change because the warming has been some what dismissed. in the end my point is made your evidence changes

The evidence is supplemented, yes. The former evidence may have been valid for the particular theory it supported.

That's all science is all about and that's what makes it particularly reliable.

 

[AndreaCristiano]

And yet the fact remains that the environment is changing. Do you fully grasp the concept of a theory?

Were not talking about theory were talking evidence. do you fully grasp the concept of reading?

 

[AndreaCristiano]

The evidence is supplemented, yes.

That's all science is all about and that's what makes it particularly reliable.

I don't see how reliable that is when it changes every 20 years but ok.

 

[Trequartista]

I don't see how reliable that is when it changes every 20 years but ok.

It's reliable as our understanding of science increases and as we do more and more research.

 

[.zero]

BOOBIES

 

[AndreaCristiano]

It's reliable as our understanding of science increases and as we do more and more research.

So that makes you think that our understanding won't increase and uncover God or proofs ? Why is it so easy for you to dismiss the unknown and live only in the box that is your senses

 

[Trequartista]

So that makes you think that our understanding won't increase and uncover God or proofs ? Why is it so easy for you to dismiss the unknown and live only in the box that is your senses

I didn't say that.

I think that it's very improbable that we will ever find evidence on the existence of a deity, as I think that it's a man-made concept.

 

[AndreaCristiano]

I didn't say that.

I think that it's very improbable that we will ever find evidence on the existence of a deity, as I think that it's a man-made concept.

So therefore you have a predisposed belief in a man made concept version of diety so you go into the science realm without being open to intelligent design or a diety

 

[Trequartista]

So therefore you have a predisposed belief in a man made concept version of diety so you go into the science realm without being open to intelligent design or a diety

No, I don't have a predisposed belief at all. If there was evidence of intelligent design or of a diety, I would accept these concepts.

It's their lack of evidence(and inconsistencies) that makes me think that they are man-made.

 

[Linebreak]

Do you believe in emotions?

 

[Trequartista]

Yes I do.

 

[Linebreak]

Yes I do.

Have you ever seen, touched or quantified emotions?

 

[AndreaCristiano]

No, I don't have a predisposed belief at all. If there was evidence of intelligent design or of a diety, I would accept these concepts.

It's their lack of evidence(and inconsistencies) that makes me think that they are man-made.

Google reasons to believe and check out thwarting scientists and pysiscist there

 

[AndreaCristiano]

Have you ever seen, touched or quantified emotions?

Nice

 

[Trequartista]

Have you ever seen, touched or quantified emotions?

Emotions can be explained by Neurobiological theories, Cognitive theories, etc.

Which are based on evidence.