Diego vs. Modric (30 Viewers)

Who?

  • Diego

  • Modric


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Jim_Boi

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2007
1,548
I think Diego is the better player. Obviously he's proved more on the big stage, but if i were a Juve fan i'd rather take Modric if i had that choice. Diego would need the team to adapt to a whole new formation where the tactics would be based on him, while modric can play aside a dm like sissoko for example
That exactly why I chose Modric over Diego, even tho I rate him very highly
 
Mar 14, 2004
4,926
I voted for Diego,cuz I considered him as Juve candidate almost half a decade back when he was a teenager in santos along with Robinho....in my old posts you can see that. I like him as a player.


But Modric at this moment(injuries and bad players rotating) would be more useful to Juve cuz he can cover almost every position in midfield. His dribbling isn't good as Diego's but those 2 players have totally different style of play....
 

cyril

Let's roll
Jul 6, 2006
2,689
I would say diego over modric. Although I'm a big modric fan, I think diego is physically better suited for juventus. He's a player that can defend as well as create in attack. Modric to me, is weak defensively and if we're lanning on having giovinco in our rotation as of next season we can't afford 2 "weak" midfielders.
 
Mar 14, 2004
4,926
I would say diego over modric. Although I'm a big modric fan, I think diego is physically better suited for juventus. He's a player that can defend as well as create in attack. Modric to me, is weak defensively and if we're lanning on having giovinco in our rotation as of next season we can't afford 2 "weak" midfielders.
My god,did you ever seen Diego play? I'm watching him right now and he and defence aren't on the same side of the world.......

So If I may ask you to stop carrying your BS on this forums.

And for further footie lecture....take a look at England-Croatia 2-3 game,when modric played DM...
 

Miki

Senior Member
Jun 18, 2008
880
I would say diego over modric. Although I'm a big modric fan, I think diego is physically better suited for juventus. He's a player that can defend as well as create in attack. Modric to me, is weak defensively and if we're lanning on having giovinco in our rotation as of next season we can't afford 2 "weak" midfielders.
I disagree, I would sooner said the opposite. Modric is more versatile imo.
 

cyril

Let's roll
Jul 6, 2006
2,689
My god,did you ever seen Diego play? I'm watching him right now and he and defence aren't on the same side of the world.......

So If I may ask you to stop carrying your BS on this forums.

And for further footie lecture....take a look at England-Croatia 2-3 game,when modric played DM...
I said he is more physically suited. And If you consider what I'm saying BS then stop reading them. I'm allowed to voice my opinion as much as I want. Thank you
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,891
I would say diego over modric. Although I'm a big modric fan, I think diego is physically better suited for juventus. He's a player that can defend as well as create in attack. Modric to me, is weak defensively and if we're lanning on having giovinco in our rotation as of next season we can't afford 2 "weak" midfielders.
Dude, Modric is a Baresi for Diego if we're talking about defense.
Diego doesn't defend at all. Modric has a sick work-rate and he's a pain in the ass for the opponents. He intercepts a lot of passes and he wins a lot of balls.
 

alex'10

Junior Member
Sep 17, 2008
221
neither will come when the board will give nedved another 2 years to run.
Nedved is too inconsistent. He's been passenger this season, not suprising when you consider his age, he should hang up his boots at the end of the season, enough with presisting with hasbeens, unless we want to become like AC milan. He cannot lead us to trophies anymore so why keep him on? It's very distrubing & embarrasing in a sense that we have to rely on a 35year old for creatvity, & support for the strikers, it is even more worrying that we don't even have a recognized left sided midfielder at the club or a creative central midfielder, it's makes one wonder what the fuck the clubs directors where doing during the summer, it's fucking pathetic, and then people wonder why the team is doing so badly, and get beaten by crapoli & draw with BATE.

what was the point in signing shit like Knezevic & poulsen when they were suppose to sign a reaplacement for Nedved or sign decent fullbacks, or a good enough centre back to partner Chiellini, at least do one of these things, but they could not even manage to do one of these things. You don't win anything unless you spend big on world class talent - fact. The club needs to spend it's way out of trouble in next transfer market, otherwise we will even fail to qualify for the Champions league.
 

cyril

Let's roll
Jul 6, 2006
2,689
Ален;1788898 said:
Dude, Modric is a Baresi for Diego if we're talking about defense.
Diego doesn't defend at all. Modric has a sick work-rate and he's a pain in the ass for the opponents. He intercepts a lot of passes and he wins a lot of balls.
I've seen most of modric games with the spurs this season, and 3 bremen games for diego. Modric was nowhere to be seen defensively, while diego was back helping the back line and picking up the play from there.

Maybe I haven't seen modric play as a dm yet. But from what I've seen, I found diego to have a better physic for defending then modric. This is coming from someone who highly rates modric.
 
Mar 14, 2004
4,926
Ален;1788898 said:
Dude, Modric is a Baresi for Diego if we're talking about defense.
Diego doesn't defend at all. Modric has a sick work-rate and he's a pain in the ass for the opponents. He intercepts a lot of passes and he wins a lot of balls.
Why care to explain when people are watching football trough Juventuz.com text binaries.....

Ahmed says Modric is weak,232 people here claim Modric is weak next few days....but they really don't know how to spell his name right,where does he play,which position does he play.....
 
Mar 14, 2004
4,926
I've seen most of modric games with the spurs this season, and 3 bremen games for diego. Modric was nowhere to be seen defensively, while diego was back helping the back line and picking up the play from there.

Maybe I haven't seen modric play as a dm yet. But from what I've seen, I found diego to have a better physic for defending then modric. This is coming from someone who highly rates modric.

Hesus Christ,I'm watching DIego vright now and he refuses to come back on his own half.....maybe he was sick those 3 games or they played against Real madrid/barcelona :D
 

cyril

Let's roll
Jul 6, 2006
2,689
Why care to explain when people are watching football trough Juventuz.com text binaries.....

Ahmed says Modric is weak,232 people here claim Modric is weak next few days....but they really don't know how to spell his name right,where does he play,which position does he play.....
Yeah because spelling his name right would ultimately make us aware of his soccer skills. One thing you have on us is that we aren't croatian therefore we haven't followed him through his whole career. But that's it, we're all football fans and we all watch plenty of games.
 

dao_nq

Junior Member
Feb 6, 2008
325
In Tottenham, Modric seems to be lack of inspiration, he's quite different when he play for Croatia. I really hope he'll join us, which will help him to have new and huge inspiration. I prefer Modric than Diego.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 30)