I can not speak for the WHOLE british footballing public, only for the hundreds I know personally, and the thousands, I have met over the years. On that basis, I have a decent idea of how highly king eric was valued. Its not solely talent that makes me personally, rate a player, its who they are off the pitch, how i perceive their mind, their spirit, their hearts...true, many fans judge players solely on what they achieve on the pitch in terms of success. I do not, however. Its clear that I have a preference for vicious types, rough justice artists...but that isn't to say i don't respect and value the gentile, gentlemanly comportment of Del Piero, as well as his obvious football talent...one of the greatest goals I have seen, in 20 years of of watching mainly british and italian football, as well as the international tournaments, perhaps my number one goal, definitely in the top 5, was Del Piero's goal in a 3-2 win over fiorentina; sousa, it may have been, floated a 30-40 yard ball over the defence, Alex let it drop, and hit is first time on the volley, with the outside of his right boot, the ball curled, then dipped into the top corner, over the keepers net. Pure and divine quality./..but like I say, the vicious types excite me more than DP. That will never change. I get as much pleasure seeing Chiellini crunch someone, as I do seeing Del Piero score another free kick. Its a different kind of pleasure...
The british press, like the italian press, is full of sensationalism. Its how tabloid newspapers are sold...but I thought every knew that.
Dude, Cantona is very popular, and for a good reason, he was despite being bit of a madman (too much so early in his career, calmed down later), an iconic mofo (dude was simply awesome personality wise, no one can be that typically arrogant frenchy and still be liked

as he was) and charismatic legend with lots of flair and skill, I dont think even the rival fans disliked him much despite his ways (he was a spectacle, on and off the pitch, hehe), I mean FFS some of them started popping their collar after him
And defenitely as a player he was very good, but he is a Man U legend and EPL, but other then that, many who watched him, Man U fans, included would begrudgingly say that he wasnt more then that, he never took off in his career internationally speaking, in continental football, or stood out to get the kind of reputation the top top players did. He simply didnt deliver outside a not so strong EPL (and his numbers there are good, 13-14 leagues a season, but nothing great or such), to get that kind of reputation and be valued with the best around. Its unfortunate, because he blew his chance in the French NT (thats a scenario where his strong bad boy personality worked against him), and did little to nothing in the European stage, its unfortunate but defenitely someone who didnt take his career to a higher standard (because he was really talented).
I totally understand your above post in sentiment, but when it comes down to it, there are lots of players he were better then, but he didnt reach the heights the real top players did at their best. And its no disrespect to him, but the EPL he dominated and stood out in was a quite barren EPL (him and Le Tissier were great to watch, but it was a league that had little, Shearer, Ian Wright, Cascoigne for some years, but very little else, the quality players like the latter were leaving the league), far from what it became later. Its not to demean him (and it isnt really, he was still a quality player, but just made it easier for him to stand out without much other of players like that), but the league in overall really was.
For example, newcomers of the likes of Bergkamp and especially Henry, who started the wave of quality foreign players, are unquestionably better players then him (Bergkamp was so ridicolous, that even if he didnt play much European games, he was still voted in top 3 in Golden ball and FIFA awards), especially Henry who is way better better in EPL wise (ofcourse overall too). It was a league that didnt have enough competion in terms of profile quality names. For example, Zola was a great player, but one who had a little bit hard career in Italy after a while and was cast aside a bit in Parma and NT for other players (very competetive back then with lots of quality players, harder to stand out with likes of Baggio et al), and he came to EPL and dominated like hell, and stood out aloooooot in EPL, and that wasnt only because of his sheer quality but because of coming to league with little players like him (Del Piero was one of those players who overshadowed Zola in League and took ze NT spot, imagine if he was in EPL back then? He would also seem to be way better then he was, and back then, he was near unstoppable in League and CL).
Again, I totally understand your sentiment of liking him (though hard men are fine, but I would hardly say one get as much pleasure watching Giorgo as with Ale

You need your head checked

), and for those reasons, but its different matter when he is to be compared to top players who showed more and acheived more then he did. He could have been more, but he stopped at being domestic league legend then a one of in overall football, that competed with the better players of that time.
P.S Damn your long post made me post even longer one
