Diego Ribas da Cunha (18 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
We don't necessarily need to have a creative AM but we do need to have at least one CM with a good range of passing, whether this be Almiron or Tiago or whoever.

I would like to keep Camo and Neddy, or have similar style players, with a Milan style CM ie a Gattuso type destroyer beside a playmaker like Pirlo. While I don't expect us to sign players on that level, that is the midfield system I would like to see us play.
 

Snoop

Sabet is a nasty virgin
Oct 2, 2001
28,186
Nedved is good enough to be a starter for another season. I don't think Diego comes even close to Camoranesi, but i'm not going to contest that.

Just seems like a waste of capital, to go for an expensive player such as Diego, that will replace a player that doesn't need replacing.
waste of capital, like replacing Balzaretti?


in your previous post, you forgot these.
3-5-2
-----------Dm ------ DM------------

Camo------------Diego ----------- Nedved


3-4-1-2


Camo --- M-----------------M---- Nedved

---------------Diego -----------------------


and other possible formations, no need to count.. btw doesn't Giovinco play behind the strikers too? how is there a place for him?

buying an attacking midfielder like Diego or a better quality would be the best thing our board will have done, that;s is what we are missing since Zidane's departure.
 

Snoop

Sabet is a nasty virgin
Oct 2, 2001
28,186
Both Camo and Nedved are tacklers, they don't only concentrate on attack. But the questions is, can they keep themselves in top fatigue? they are not young anymore, and specially the second.
 

sateeh

Day Walker
Jul 28, 2003
8,020
waste of capital, like replacing Balzaretti?


in your previous post, you forgot these.
3-5-2
-----------Dm ------ DM------------

Camo------------Diego ----------- Nedved


3-4-1-2


Camo --- M-----------------M---- Nedved

---------------Diego -----------------------


and other possible formations, no need to count.. btw doesn't Giovinco play behind the strikers too? how is there a place for him?

buying an attacking midfielder like Diego or a better quality would be the best thing our board will have done, that;s is what we are missing since Zidane's departure.
in both formations we would have to sacrifice the full backs and there we will need three of the best CBs in the league to keep those goals from going in.

and i think that both formations would just drain camo and neddy physically. As they will have to cover a lot of ground(even more than they do now and they cover a lot)

I don't mind diego or VDV but if we are to bring them then i can't see how are we going to keep camo especially. As i can't see any of those players sitting on the bench and rotation isn't the best system imo.
 

Juve Libnan

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2007
1,394
we need an amf to run our midfield and help our strikers...so many players coem to mind but id love for diego to join esp since we have no big brazilian names in our squad..or argentinean
but diego will cost around 25million euros which is nearly half our budget so i dont see it happening
lets see if any unknown players show sthing special in the copa america
 

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
16,706
waste of capital, like replacing Balzaretti?
Balzaretti, came for free, we sell him for money and get a free replacement in Molinaro and already have a replacement at the club in Chiellini. That's actually a gain of capital, instead of a waste.


in your previous post, you forgot these.
3-5-2
-----------Dm ------ DM------------

Camo------------Diego ----------- Nedved


3-4-1-2


Camo --- M-----------------M---- Nedved

---------------Diego -----------------------
These formations would compromise Nedved and Camoranesi's abilities even more. Both their strengths lie in the offence, if you constrict them to these defensive roles, you'll waste them. If you do let them play to their fullest offensively, the team will suffer immensly defensively. To be honest, I want Nedved and Camo to get more freedom in attack and not have to think about defending as much. Which is impossible in your formations.

and other possible formations, no need to count.. btw doesn't Giovinco play behind the strikers too? how is there a place for him?
Giovinco isn't staying this season probably. If he were to stay, he should function as Nedved's understudy.

buying an attacking midfielder like Diego or a better quality would be the best thing our board will have done, that;s is what we are missing since Zidane's departure.
Obviously I disagree.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
The only problem with this diamond formation is that u need a dogfighter in the DMF position.
So the playmaker can concentrate on attack and not defence.
Sissoko is capble of being the destroyer.
I actually dont think Sissoko has the positional sense to be the holding Mid in front of the defense.If he's given a role kind of like Gattuso's in milan he will excell.Kind of like this

Diamond
-------------------Defensive mid

------------Tiago---------sissoko


--------------------Nedved
 

pavelnedved

official nedved copy
Jul 15, 2006
2,992
I actually dont think Sissoko has the positional sense to be the holding Mid in front of the defense.If he's given a role kind of like Gattuso's in milan he will excell.Kind of like this

Diamond
-------------------Defensive mid

------------Tiago---------sissoko


--------------------Nedved
emerson would have been the man. maybe gilberto silva
 

nucleo21

THE HUNTER
Apr 1, 2007
64
I think a defence line consisting of Grygera - Milito - Chiellini will be solid enough in 3-5-2 formation.
I don't thin that Juve will play 3-5-2 formation, because there isn't PlayStation game.
With 3 defenders squads playing only in special matches or in the middle of second half. I hope you understand what i am trying to say. I think these are possible formations that Ranieri will use. 4-4-2, 4-3-3 or 4-1-2-1-2.


Buffon

Grygera Milito Barzagli Chiellini


Tiago

Camoranesi Nedved

Diego


Del Piero Huntelaar


Anybody any idea ????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)