Cause i sense my point was missed. Forlan used to be a classic goal loser. We need a prolific youg finisher, not a former goal-loser who has aged well. Forlan is now a great player and although i am sure that he is going to score much much less in Italy, than he does in spain, he will sure be a huge upgrade over Amauri+iaq.
But this is not what we want, we need a permanent replacement for treze and that player should be young and a finisher above all. If we invest +20mil on Forlan, Imo we repeat the Amauri mistake once again. Both are good players but not the finisher we want. They are quick fix that consumes the resousces we will need to get a permanent fix. I would rather see us buy a Dzeko for 35-40mil and have him as a starter besides Diego/amauri/giovinco, than spend 20mil for a forlan now and 20 in 2 years for a new Iaq (pazzini). Of course if we sell any of our current forwards, in order to make space and funds to buy Forlan, with 10-15+player then he is all welcomed, but not in the expense of our permanent deal over our new age starter CF. If we can afford only 20mil this year, then keep Treze and buy his succesor with 40mil next year. Enough of this quantity>quality strategy, we cant win nothing this season, lets maximise our chances in the future!