I just read the press release by Juve, I think this will stay.
The press release said the compensation reduction agreement was valid, no other paper was valid. However Juve was later supposed to renegotiate given 19/20 matches were to be replayed, which Juve didn't. Hence Juve are ordered to compensate half of requested amount.
The press release said the compensation reduction agreement was valid, no other paper was valid. However Juve was later supposed to renegotiate given 19/20 matches were to be replayed, which Juve didn't. Hence Juve are ordered to compensate half of requested amount.
the verdict's explanation isn't out yet, journalists are only speculating based on the available info. for me it doesn't make sense. ronaldo asked for 20m, the club said that the request is invalid, the jury made a majority decision (pretty rare according to italian sources) to award half of the request, which is also weird. i don't know about similar italian cases but in hungary work related requests are either awarded or denied without any middle ground. it will be interesting to read the reasoning once it's available
question is whether he has the right and to me it looks like it's rather him who used some loopholes to get the money
it's about the deferred wages. the players who got their wages for the covid season were still at the club when they got their compensation. the explanation of the verdict isn't out yet but allegedly the jury argued that while no appropriate documents were signed by ronaldo, he was probably promised to get that money, and while both parties are responsible, he can't get the whole amount he's asking for, but he's entitled to the half of it. such a weird thing. again, there was no signed contract about that money. and the jury's decision wasn't even that obvious, it was a split decision which is unusual. and last year his request was already denied.
but it's nice to know that some juve fans surely know that ronaldo has every right to ask for that money.
it's about the deferred wages. the players who got their wages for the covid season were still at the club when they got their compensation. the explanation of the verdict isn't out yet but allegedly the jury argued that while no appropriate documents were signed by ronaldo, he was probably promised to get that money, and while both parties are responsible, he can't get the whole amount he's asking for, but he's entitled to the half of it. such a weird thing. again, there was no signed contract about that money. and the jury's decision wasn't even that obvious, it was a split decision which is unusual. and last year his request was already denied.
but it's nice to know that some juve fans surely know that ronaldo has every right to ask for that money.
I'm not a Ronaldo hater by any means, but if he was able to put his ego aside, he'd still be banging in important goals as a rotational player for a top club in Europe....
And look, the guy is a proven winner and one of the greatest players of all time. So it would be silly for me to say he only cares about money/individual stats or criticize his career in any way. If he was ready to move on to this stage in his career (like Messi), so be it. But it just felt like he had something left to give in Europe and left prematurely.
And look, the guy is a proven winner and one of the greatest players of all time. So it would be silly for me to say he only cares about money/individual stats or criticize his career in any way. If he was ready to move on to this stage in his career (like Messi), so be it. But it just felt like he had something left to give in Europe and left prematurely.
