Cristiano Giuntoli (25 Viewers)

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
28,470
How about checking the numbers again? marotta is the one who spent 500 million on deadwood with no resale value. most of paratici's transfers paid off what club spent on them.
that's simply inaccurate bullshit

during the marotta era we had ONE single player sold with minusvalenza. (i don't even remember the name, it was a youth player with a loss of like 1 million, feel free to prove me wrong by checking the financial reports)

paratici managed to allegedly sign ronaldo (ronaldo picked juventus, not vice versa), thus making higuain redundant. he signed duds like ramsey, signed romero, sold him with minusvalenza to atalanta who managed to milk spurs somehow, and there's arthur, literally the worst signing ever by juventus

he had the right ideas :baus: you're truly living in an alternative reality
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
38,236
that's simply inaccurate bullshit

during the marotta era we had ONE single player sold with minusvalenza. (i don't even remember the name, it was a youth player with a loss of like 1 million, feel free to prove me wrong by checking the financial reports)

paratici managed to allegedly sign ronaldo (ronaldo picked juventus, not vice versa), thus making higuain redundant. he signed duds like ramsey, signed romero, sold him with minusvalenza to atalanta who managed to milk spurs somehow, and there's arthur, literally the worst signing ever by juventus

he had the right ideas :baus: you're truly living in an alternative reality
But he did offer his cock to Turk and really that's all that matters to Turk.

Dude could start a poultry farm.
 
Jul 2, 2006
18,848
that's simply inaccurate bullshit

during the marotta era we had ONE single player sold with minusvalenza. (i don't even remember the name, it was a youth player with a loss of like 1 million, feel free to prove me wrong by checking the financial reports)

paratici managed to allegedly sign ronaldo (ronaldo picked juventus, not vice versa), thus making higuain redundant. he signed duds like ramsey, signed romero, sold him with minusvalenza to atalanta who managed to milk spurs somehow, and there's arthur, literally the worst signing ever by juventus

he had the right ideas :baus: you're truly living in an alternative reality
if that is bulshit, this reply of yours is a triceratops diarrhea. we did not sell anyone with minusvaluenza because piece of shit could not sell at all. all the junk he brought here for hundreds of millions(costa, bernardeschi, giovinco, higuain, matuidi, mandzukic) did left for free. ones that got sold was sold for half their actual worth like coman, vidal, pogba.

higuain was not made reduntant because of ronaldo. he was always reduntant because he was a wanker, the reason he ended up at garbage city with a discount. arthur was a way to get rid of pjanic who turned out to be even worse than arthur. arthur's true cost was plus 10 million paid to barcelona. it was a shit transfer, not nearly as destructive as higuain who single handedly crippled the club finances for a decade.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
59,298
if that is bulshit, this reply of yours is a triceratops diarrhea. we did not sell anyone with minusvaluenza because piece of shit could not sell at all. all the junk he brought here for hundreds of millions(costa, bernardeschi, giovinco, higuain, matuidi, mandzukic) did left for free. ones that got sold was sold for half their actual worth like coman, vidal, pogba.

higuain was not made reduntant because of ronaldo. he was always reduntant because he was a wanker, the reason he ended up at garbage city with a discount. arthur was a way to get rid of pjanic who turned out to be even worse than arthur. arthur's true cost was plus 10 million paid to barcelona. it was a shit transfer, not nearly as destructive as higuain who single handedly crippled the club finances for a decade.

giphy.gif


- - - Updated - - -

Didn't we sell him for a world record transfer?

105m world record transfer fee was half Pogbas value (same Pogba who stunk it up for them).


And he included our youth player, Giovinco, as one of the many players we signed for 100s of millions and lost for nothing.


It's really ridiculous we entertain this level of warped reality delusion on daily basis.
 
Last edited:

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
62,568
if that is bulshit, this reply of yours is a triceratops diarrhea. we did not sell anyone with minusvaluenza because piece of shit could not sell at all. all the junk he brought here for hundreds of millions(costa, bernardeschi, giovinco, higuain, matuidi, mandzukic) did left for free. ones that got sold was sold for half their actual worth like coman, vidal, pogba.

higuain was not made reduntant because of ronaldo. he was always reduntant because he was a wanker, the reason he ended up at garbage city with a discount. arthur was a way to get rid of pjanic who turned out to be even worse than arthur. arthur's true cost was plus 10 million paid to barcelona. it was a shit transfer, not nearly as destructive as higuain who single handedly crippled the club finances for a decade.
Your delusions are getting out of hand.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
38,236
if that is bulshit, this reply of yours is a triceratops diarrhea. we did not sell anyone with minusvaluenza because piece of shit could not sell at all. all the junk he brought here for hundreds of millions(costa, bernardeschi, giovinco, higuain, matuidi, mandzukic) did left for free. ones that got sold was sold for half their actual worth like coman, vidal, pogba.

higuain was not made reduntant because of ronaldo. he was always reduntant because he was a wanker, the reason he ended up at garbage city with a discount. arthur was a way to get rid of pjanic who turned out to be even worse than arthur. arthur's true cost was plus 10 million paid to barcelona. it was a shit transfer, not nearly as destructive as higuain who single handedly crippled the club finances for a decade.
I could think of someone else who is redundant because he's a wanker.
 
Jul 2, 2006
18,848
And he included our youth player, Giovinco, as one of the many players we signed for 100s of millions and lost for nothing.


It's really ridiculous we entertain this level of warped reality delusion on daily basis.
yes, our youth player giovinco who is given away to parma for 3 years, then bought for 13 million, only to leave for free again. you are uninformed about what you are talking about and putting the blame on someone else for it.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
59,298
yes, our youth player giovinco who is given away to parma for 3 years, then bought for 13 million, only to leave for free again. you are uninformed about what you are talking about and putting the blame on someone else for it.
It was half share you mental midget. We loaned him out to Parma. Then loan and sold half of him for 4m to Parma 2nd season there, then bought back that half for 11m when he was having a great season. Was the price of having big time breakthrough season.

He was allways in our books as one of our players. From 2003 as a small child to him leaving for good (at small child size) in 2015 to Toronto (he spent 3 seasons in fringes in Juve, so essentially just wanted to move him on at that time).


So it's totally BS to try to include him as failed signing we signed for alot and lost for nothing. When he was allways one of our players. Just one we half shared back for 7m after a great season, half shares was a weird system but one that worked well for incentives to use players well.
 
Jul 2, 2006
18,848
It was half share you mental midget. We loaned him out to Parma. Then loan and sold half of him for 4m to Parma 2nd season there, then bought back that half for 11m when he was having a great season. Was the price of having big time breakthrough season.

He was allways in our books as one of our players. From 2003 as a small child to him leaving for good (at small child size) in 2015 to Toronto (he spent 3 seasons in fringes in Juve, so essentially just wanted to move him on at that time).


So it's totally BS to try to include him as failed signing we signed for alot and lost for nothing. When he was allways one of our players. Just one we half shared back for 7m after a great season, half shares was a weird system but one that worked well for incentives to use players well.
He was one of the if not the most promising italian players of that time. not only he sent him away to an obscure team to spent his most critical years in his career but he also managed to get a whopping 4m(the money he spent for peluso) from parma. club literally spent an extra 7 million for a player who was already ours to make him spent 2 years there. parma made marotta his bitch like many more.

Who is being a mental midget here? The one pointing out of one the most comical transfer stories in history of the club as a fiasco or the apologist who is trying really hard to justify this mess?
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
38,236
He was one of the if not the most promising italian players of that time. not only he sent him away to an obscure team to spent his most critical years in his career but he also managed to get a whopping 4m(the money he spent for peluso) from parma. club literally spent an extra 7 million for a player who was already ours to make him spent 2 years there. parma made marotta his bitch like many more.

Who is being a mental midget here? The one pointing out of one the most comical transfer stories in history of the club as a fiasco or the apologist who is trying really hard to justify this mess?
Surely not you.

I mean, you know what a triceratops is. You're by far the smartest troglodyte on this forum.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 20)