I'd play DC surely. I'm all for Pazzini starting cause it means at least one of Milan's only two dangerous forwards (binho and El Shawarma) won't start.
I'd play DC surely. I'm all for Pazzini starting cause it means at least one of Milan's only two dangerous forwards (binho and El Shawarma) won't start.
I'd be playing a four man defence, because I think Juve have looked distinctly uncomfortable playing against Milan since the move to 3-5-2.
Allegri may not get much right, but he seems to understand how to control Juve's play when they use 3-5-2. Milan also get plenty of counter attacks and tend to look pretty dangerous.
That's in stark contrast to the pasting Juve gave Milan at the start of last season when playing 4-3-3 and the way Juve dominated the 'gol di Muntari' game after changing from 3-5-2 to 4-3-3.
I'd be playing a four man defence, because I think Juve have looked distinctly uncomfortable playing against Milan since the move to 3-5-2.
Allegri may not get much right, but he seems to understand how to control Juve's play when they use 3-5-2. Milan also get plenty of counter attacks and tend to look pretty dangerous.
That's in stark contrast to the pasting Juve gave Milan at the start of last season when playing 4-3-3 and the way Juve dominated the 'gol di Muntari' game after changing from 3-5-2 to 4-3-3.
As a Pazzini fan, I can always see why people would be concerned about him playing.
He's certainly more likely to be a threat than the likes of Robinho or Bojan.
Well, it doesn't make sense to play a 352 without Chiellilni at the back solidifying the defense or without Asamoah on the left and the stability he offers on the left wing.
I feel our team flow is much better (less predictable) in the 433. As far as Pazzini, his movement in the box is what worries me, again leading me to believe 4 at the back is necessary, that and containing a hot SES.
I feel our team flow is much better (less predictable) in the 433. As far as Pazzini, his movement in the box is what worries me, again leading me to believe 4 at the back is necessary, that and containing a hot SES.
Ok. So, with that said...which formation would you prefer and why?
I see many claim we have players built for the 352 and that's how our mercato turned out. But, equally, we have the players just as (if not more IMO) equipped to boss around other teams with the 433.
And, as we all know, me being a huge fan of the 433 is because it is of my opinion that in the left both Giovinco and Vucinic are more dangerous. And being our two strongest attackers, it makes little sense to me why we shouldn't accommodate to their styles given our struggles for goals FROM our strikers.
Ok. So, with that said...which formation would you prefer and why?
I see many claim we have players built for the 352 and that's how our mercato turned out. But, equally, we have the players just as (if not more IMO) equipped to boss around other teams with the 433.
And, as we all know, me being a huge fan of the 433 is because it is of my opinion that in the left both Giovinco and Vucinic are more dangerous. And being our two strongest attackers, it makes little sense to me why we shouldn't accommodate to their styles given our struggles for goals FROM our strikers.