Computer security (1 Viewer)

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#41
Well that's what happens when you don't pay attention to what you install or you just get infected with spyware. :) A buddy of mine who lives 300km away told me a few weeks ago he's thinking of buying a new computer because his current one is so slow he can't get anything done. I would clean up his computer but he lives too far away. This is a very common problem..
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
#42
++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++


That's way low for a giant like FM. Windows itself already uses half that amount or more, which means the memory FM needs is drawn from virtual memory (= disk space) which is much, much slower.

No, the video card has a memory of its own, it doesn't interfere with the RAM.
Martin, some on-board graphic cards do take their memory from the RAM
 

nedved34

Senior Member
Oct 3, 2002
3,919
#44
++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++
Well that's what happens when you don't pay attention to what you install or you just get infected with spyware. :) A buddy of mine who lives 300km away told me a few weeks ago he's thinking of buying a new computer because his current one is so slow he can't get anything done. I would clean up his computer but he lives too far away. This is a very common problem..
Man it realy feels like I am using a brand new computer :D
I always pay attention when I install.All these because of the "computer guy" that installed these programs.I don't even use them,or don't know what are they.The start up problem was from the first day after I formated my PC,I told him that, he said I need rams :undecide: you see what I mean :)
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
#46
++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++


it isnt.:) just didnt know the english term for the damn thing
But 256 MB of RAM with a VGA on board that is taking its memory from them is enough for FM, I run it on a system similar to that and it does not cause any problems with me
 
OP
mikhail

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #49
    0. EDITORIAL
    ============

    Are free security products good enough to protect your computer?

    It's a question that needs to be answered. With the internet
    currently besieged by spyware, trojans and other malware agents
    you can argue that we all should be protecting our computers
    with the best security products available rather than ones which
    are simply free.

    So how good are free security programs?

    It's a tough one to answer as it's hard to generalize. If
    pushed, I'd probably say they are very good indeed but not
    necessarily the best.

    Take the case of the free AVG Anti-virus program. It's a great
    program that’s widely used by subscribers to this newsletter. In
    fact it's one of the programs I recommend in my "46 Best-ever
    Freeware Utilities" list.

    Good though it is, AVG is not in my opinion the best anti-virus
    program available. I suspect that title belongs to one of the
    commercial products NOD32, Norton AV, PC-Cillin or maybe F-
    Secure. You can argue which one but they may well all be better
    than AVG.

    You can see this clearly from a table I featured in last month's
    issue of the newsletter. This table shows the number of
    occasions since 2003 that various AV products have received a
    perfect score from Virus Bulletin newsletter's monthly tests.

    NOD32 10/10 100%
    Norton 9/9 100%
    F-Secure 9/9 100%
    Trend 8/8 100%
    Kaspersky 9/11 82%
    McAfee 8/10 80%
    AVG 6/8 75%
    Norman 7/10 70%
    F-Prot 6/9 67%
    Avast 6/9 67%

    You don't need to be a scientist to conclude that AVG and
    another free program Avast have simply not performed as well as
    the top commercial products.

    This finding coincides with my own experience testing trojans
    over at www.anti-trojan-software-reviews.com. AVG has performed
    well in detecting trojans, but not as well as commercial
    products like NOD32.

    If you use AVG you are probably starting to feel a little
    depressed at this point but read on, this story has a happy
    ending. Better still, it's a happy ending with a moral.

    The Virus Bulletin results give a misleading impression. They
    imply that the top anti-virus products have perfect detection
    rates while the rest fall short.

    This is not the case. All AV products have less than perfect
    detection rates, the top products included.

    All the Virus Bulletin results show is that in specific months
    the top products detected all the top 100 viruses in circulation
    in that month. Had they tested the top 1000 I suspect every
    product would get less than 100% detection. In fact, I'm certain
    of it.

    Computer security is like any other kind of security. Perfection
    does exit. It's a numbers game where you have to balance the
    level of protection against the cost of providing that
    protection.

    Your current car is probably quite safe to drive but it's not
    perfectly safe, no car is. Moreover, I bet there are safer cars
    than yours so why don't you drive one of those?

    The answer is simple; you've traded off some safety for other
    factors such as cost, convenience and personal model preference.

    Computer security is no different. It's all a trade off.

    Let's say AVG detects 92% of all viruses and NOD32 95%. I'm just
    making those numbers up but I suspect they are not too far off
    the mark.

    What cost are you prepared to pay to lift your detection rate
    from 92% to 95%?

    Some of you may well be prepared to fork out $39 for NOD32 to
    get that increment in protection, others not.

    But there are other ways of lifting the detection rate.

    All you have to do is add another layer of security in addition
    to AVG. Furthermore it's easy to do using free products.

    I know because I've just proved it experimentally using a series
    of malware detection tests with AVG and NOD32.

    First up, the results of my tests confirm that both products
    detect most malware products but NOD32 detects slightly more.

    Second the tests also reveal that even NOD32 missed some malware
    products entirely.

    Third and most importantly, the tests show that by layering
    protection by combining AVG with another free product, Ewido,
    the overall detection rates were higher than using NOD32 alone.

    You can find the results of the tests on the Tech Support Alert
    web site at http://www.techsupportalert.com/free-vs-paid-av.htm

    Let us now return to our original questions:

    Are free security products good enough to protect your PC?

    My answer is yes, particularly if you use several products to
    give layered protection.

    Do commercial products give better protection?

    With AV products, the answer is yes again. However the level of
    protection you get from using free products in layers may be
    more than sufficient for most users’ needs.

    See, I told you this story had a happy ending ;>)

    See you next month.

    Gizmo
    [email protected]
     

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
    #52
    AVG_CC looks like antivirus, is it? Otherwise all of those can go, it's mostly junk. SynTP is for your touchpad so it might not work as well if you kill that one. And note that msn will re-insert itself into that list the next time you start it (yes, it's evil!) so if you don't want it, you'll have to get rid of it altogether.
     
    OP
    mikhail

    mikhail

    Senior Member
    Jan 24, 2003
    9,576
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #53
    ++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++
    AVG_CC looks like antivirus, is it?
    Yeah, that's the one. Leave that one alone Z.

    Otherwise all of those can go, it's mostly junk. SynTP is for your touchpad so it might not work as well if you kill that one. And note that msn will re-insert itself into that list the next time you start it (yes, it's evil!) so if you don't want it, you'll have to get rid of it altogether.
    All true. Especially the bits about MSN.

    Any idea what srmclean is? Martin?
     
    Sep 28, 2002
    13,975
    #58
    not than anyone's bothered but nevermind. didnt have the time to check yesterday because i did the search and had to leave immediately. anyway, that smrclean has something to do with m,y soundcard and most websites recommend to leave it.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)