[CL] Champions League 2015/2016 (69 Viewers)

[Osman]

Carrasco with Morata like runs Someone gonna get red if he keeps it up.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Seven]

According to the rule, the ref could've given a red.

Could have, but not should have. I would have given it though.

 

[Hængebøffer]

No, bro. It was neither. This red card syndrome in modern football is ridiculous.

That's another discussion.

 

[Post Ironic]

i agree with him that we shouldnt have taken Morata out especially for an injured Mandzukic.Thats definitely an error from Max.

I do too. I was just teasing him about Kroos.

 

[Seven]

It was a foul that prevented a promising attack, which is a yellow.

It wasn't an obvious goal-scoring opportunity because they were at midfield and there was still a Madrid player behind the ball.

They were three against one. And the tackle was from behind to begin with.

 

[il brutto]

According to the rules, yes. But in truth you know it was a foul that prevented a goalscoring chance.

We can't know that.

 

[X Æ A-12]

Yes, according to the rules. I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure that's what they go by

Lol

 

[Klin]

Danilo looks lost.

 

[Post Ironic]

seriously i hope one of these days pepe suffers a serious injury and nobody comes to his aid

I wish the same for Vidal.

 

[lgorTudor]

carrasco destroying danilo

who was it praising danilo all the time?

 

[Osman]

Danilo

 

[Hængebøffer]

Could have, but not should have. I would have given it though.

I'm just trying to be objective. He stopped a counter and made a tackle from behind. I'm pretty sure it's a red according to the rules. I think a yellow is fine.

 

[DAiDEViL]

Danilo

getting cheaper and cheaper...

 

[Seven]

We can't know that.

Yeah, uhm, we can. Let's not be ridiculous here. Perhaps we don't know with a million percent certainty. But there is no way they would not have been through on goal. Apart from that it was a cynical foul with the intent of stopping an attack and it was a tackle from behind. I think a red card would have been more than justified.

 

[CrimsonianKing]

They were three against one. And the tackle was from behind to begin with.

A tackle from behind does not automatically grants a red card. It depends on many things. And no there was no direct goal threathing or scoring chance.

 

[Xperd]

So happy we went for Alves instead

 

[Seven]

A tackle from behind does not automatically grants a red card. It depends on many things. And no there was no direct goal threathing or scoring chance.

Wut? No scoring chance? Lol.

 

[Afghan_juventus]

Wow Carrasco has done a great job intercepting that M.O.M award from Bale.

 

[Klin]

Danilo

 

[il brutto]

Yeah, uhm, we can. Let's not be ridiculous here. Perhaps we don't know with a million percent certainty. But there is no way they would not have been through on goal. Apart from that it was a cynical foul with the intent of stopping an attack and it was a tackle from behind. I think a red card would have been more than justified.

Well okay we know that but referee can't give a decision based on what might happen. I think it was a yellow card offense but could have been red as well so these things are difficult.