Did I mention Ronaldo or Zlatan? No, I've seen Ronaldo destroy Chelsea in the Premier League, I've seen him destroy Inter. Zlatan funny one he suceeded in arguably one of the most defense minded leagues in the World.
Why is it a silly argument? Messi showcases fantastic things against open defences, when a defence is compact he struggles thats a fact, choking,struggles,plays poorly they all equate to the same meaning.
Why is it a silly argument? Messi showcases fantastic things against open defences, when a defence is compact he struggles thats a fact, choking,struggles,plays poorly they all equate to the same meaning.
When has Ronaldo destroyed Chelsea, in most games against Chelsea, Ronaldo didn't do much save one or two games out of 10.
Messi played better than Ronaldo when United and Barca met, he played better than Ronaldo when twice when the two met last season in the Classico's.
As for Zlatan, where was he against Inter? Where was he against United, the season before for Inter Milan?
There, by the same logic, i can say that Zlatan is a choker because of two or three games. Its silly. This whole choker argument, is outdated and has no basis at all.
