Ciro Immobile (7 Viewers)

only-juve

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2008
7,451
He was a limited footballer; a great goalscorer, but a frustrating footballer nonetheless ($#@!ing 7-8 offsides per game).

Now, go troll somewhere else pussy cat.
I don't know about you but I remember one game in the CL (maybe against Unitd but can't remember 100%) where Inzaghi missed like 10 "easy" chances and he kept screwing up again and again in that game.

Zidane was so pissed of him he created like dozen of chances and Inzaghi kept focking up :facepalm:

So I can understand why you hated that Rat fock.
 
Jul 1, 2010
26,352
Immobile will be Llorente's backup if he comes back but as 3rd striker, he'd have plenty of opportunities.

What I like about Immobile is his mobility (pun not intended :D), which would enable him to offer something else than Llorente. He'd be a great option to have in any case.
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,990
Immobile will be Llorente's backup if he comes back but as 3rd striker, he'd have plenty of opportunities.

What I like about Immobile is his mobility (pun not intended :D), which would enable him to offer something else than Llorente. He'd be a great option to have in any case.
i think we will end with Tevez, llorente inmobile and giovinco.
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,031
Yeah... but buying both Cerci and Immobile? 12 and 18 goals.. next in line is el kaddouri with 4 goals.. i don't believe Torino will sell both... only if we show up with big money
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,990
Yeh hehe, we will leave them in shambles. It will cost us but could be worth it.

I think Giovinco is enought to cover for Tevez, as long as we dont play 352 when tevez is not around (injured or rested).

We all know Giovinco in a 352 with his back to goal is a major fail....but in a 433 with Gio on the left, Inmobiile/Llorente as CF, and Cerci on the right could really work if we sort it out. At least we can start trying it in the coppa games or against weak teams to see how it goes.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)