Mods: can we have a poll please?
What do we think? Is genital mutilation hip or lame?
What do we think? Is genital mutilation hip or lame?
Buy on AliExpress.com
Circumcision, hip or lame? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Martin
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
But there is absolutely no need for the foreskin, don't you think? I still have it but i find it useless.
Yes, you can find other parts of the body that might be just as useless and you can say the same thing about the small toe as you said about the nails, but i see more advantages in not having the foreskin than to have it.
Yes, you can find other parts of the body that might be just as useless and you can say the same thing about the small toe as you said about the nails, but i see more advantages in not having the foreskin than to have it.
If it doesn't have any negative consequences, then no (e.g. removing someone's appendix). I think male circumcision is weird, but you're not handicaping someone (neglecting the loss in sensitivity, I don't know how important that is to you 
), so I don't have anything against it. But like I said before, female circumcision is sick and should be banned forever.
), so I don't have anything against it. But like I said before, female circumcision is sick and should be banned forever.
If it doesn't have any negative consequences, then no (e.g. removing someone's appendix). I think male circumcision is weird, but you're not handicaping someone (neglecting the loss in sensitivity, I don't know how important that is to you ), so I don't have anything against it. But like I said before, female circumcision is sick and should be banned forever.
), so I don't have anything against it. But like I said before, female circumcision is sick and should be banned forever.
Because the trouble of preemptively removing the appendix doesn't make up for nullifying the minimal risk of getting an appendecitis.
I agree it doesn't make sense, but I don't it agree it's immoral. There aren't strong arguments pro, but there also aren't strong arguments contra.
Respect for dead bodies is something cultural I guess. There isn't a single rational explanation for why we should care about what happens to dead bodies, because cutting up dead bodies - just like removing the foreskin - doesn't harm anybody.
I agree it doesn't make sense, but I don't it agree it's immoral. There aren't strong arguments pro, but there also aren't strong arguments contra.
Respect for dead bodies is something cultural I guess. There isn't a single rational explanation for why we should care about what happens to dead bodies, because cutting up dead bodies - just like removing the foreskin - doesn't harm anybody.