Christian Poulsen (23 Viewers)

Should Poulsen be part of the Juve squad for the 2010/11 season?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Depends on who is signed and what offers are made for Poulsen


Results are only viewable after voting.

Kayo

Junior Member
Mar 18, 2007
435
You guys are overrating Poulsen so much. I am not impressed at all from what I've seen. Sure he's been ok in some games, but horrific in others. I can't think of him getting much better than this.

You asked for decent defensive midfielders around the 7m price-tag?

Gojko Kacar from Hertha is a promising talent, I doubt he would cost much more than 7m euro and he'll, apart from Poulsen, most likely get better.

Miguel Veloso is also good, but we'll probably need to add abit more to get him.

Heck, why not sell Poulsen and other useless players like Marchionni, Zebina, Almiron, Molinaro for whatever price we can and sum it up to make an offer for Hamsik?

Anyway, I stand by my point and think Poulsen is useless and should be sold as soon as its possible. He is not a long-term Juventus material. You guys seemed to have lowered your standards alot for this team due to the shitty transfers we have had.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Sadomin

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2005
7,327
Kacar and Veloso would cost much more than 7 m, and I dare say the latter isn't even better than Poulsen.

Buying Hamsik is great and all, but what's the point if we don't have any alternatives in case one ouf our midfielders get injured? What are you planning to do when Sissoko goes the African Cup? Play Hamsik instead?
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
You guys are overrating Poulsen so much. I am not impressed at all from what I've seen. Sure he's been ok in some games, but horrific in others. I can't think of him getting much better than this.

You asked for decent defensive midfielders around the 7m price-tag?

Gojko Kacar from Hertha is a promising talent, I doubt he would cost much more than 7m euro and he'll, apart from Poulsen, most likely get better.

Miguel Veloso is also good, but we'll probably need to add abit more to get him.

Heck, why not sell Poulsen and other useless players like Marchionni, Zebina, Almiron, Molinaro for whatever price we can and sum it up to make an offer for Hamsik?

Anyway, I stand by my point and think Poulsen is useless and should be sold as soon as its possible. He is not a long-term Juventus material. You guys seemed to have lowered your standards alot for this team due to the shitty transfers we have had.
so..........you could not provide even 1 guy as a Poulsen replacement
 

Kayo

Junior Member
Mar 18, 2007
435
Who would both cost more than 7 m. We sold bloody Nocerino and Appiah for 7-8 m.
Appiah was good when we sold him. He wasn't the horrible player he is today.

Kacar wouldn't cost much more than 7m. I also stated that Veloso would probably cost abit more, but I doubt he's alot higher than 10m.

I would even look forward to buying 2-3 unproven Italian youngsters than having Poulsen taking up space.
 

v1rtu4l

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2008
6,349
how come you always want players with different positions as replacement for poulsen ? did you get, that a replacement should be able to perform on the same position as the one he replaces ?

just reading hamsik makes me laugh .. so we will cut that crap with defensive midfielders that defend and just outscore our opponent when they take a walk in our midfield ?

if you play hamsik you have to play one more midfielder that does play the game for hamsing the 70 minutes per match he goes missing.
 

Kayo

Junior Member
Mar 18, 2007
435
how come you always want players with different positions as replacement for poulsen ? did you get, that a replacement should be able to perform on the same position as the one he replaces ?

just reading hamsik makes me laugh .. so we will cut that crap with defensive midfielders that defend and just outscore our opponent when they take a walk in our midfield ?

if you play hamsik you have to play one more midfielder that does play the game for hamsing the 70 minutes per match he goes missing.
Please don't try to mislead this. Hamsik wasn't the primary suggestion or anything. It was just a way of telling how Poulsen's transfer money could go to something even better. Are you seeking for Poulsen's clone or what? The players I stated will obviously work somewhat different. You make it sound like Poulsen worked perfect on his DM spot. We will most likely change our tactics too in the upcoming season so I don't understand why a midfielder like Poulsen is so hard to replace. We already have Sissoko who most likely will play as a defensive midfielder.
 

cimenk

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2008
3,129
There is the news that Sporting want 12 mill Poundsterling for Veloso, that is the value they request to Bolton. They already lower their request from the initial 17 mill Poundsterling. So no way Veloso isn't cost more than 10 mill. Also i don't think that Veloso guy is a very good player
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
The Veloso I remember was a good player but I guess not many here like him because he's Ronaldo-esque. I haven't seen him play in a while though so I can't say.
 

Lo-Pan

Disciple of Gonzo
Feb 11, 2009
2,788
Diarra would make us incredibly Tough to break through...Double Mali Muscle Monsters...

4-3-2-1

Buffon
Zebina Cann Chiellini Criscito/grosso
Diarra Marchiso Momo
Diego Giovinco
Treze/Iaquinta/Amauri

Del Piero can share a spot with Giovinco....or the front 2-1 can be changed to a 1-2...with Diego behind Iaquinta/trez/Amauri and Gio/Del Piero.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 23)