Did you watch the game? Did you happen to notice he was quite bad in this game? Did you also happen to notice that in the first half he played in, was one of the worst Juve performance ever by the team? And the second half he didnt play much in due to being substitued 15 mins into it, we were MUCH MUCH better then the first halfs abomination? (doesnt say much, we were just that awful in the first).
In what world would all this mean we lost because we took out Poulsen? Didnt you notice he did everything wrong basically? (like almost all of our players and specially midfielders, except Marchisio at times).
Did you watch the game? Did you happen to notice he was quite bad in this game? Did you also happen to notice that in the first half he played in, was one of the worst Juve performance ever by the team? And the second half he didnt play much in due to being substitued 15 mins into it, we were MUCH MUCH better then the first halfs abomination? (doesnt say much, we were just that awful in the first).
In what world would all this mean we lost because we took out Poulsen? Didnt you notice he did everything wrong basically? (like almost all of our players and specially midfielders, except Marchisio at times).
weel... did u notice that i did not defend poulsen. . .
i pointed ranieri mistake. . .they owned us with simplicio migliacio( i cant spell the name well) and bresciano
and in what world did i say that we lost because the "big" poulsen was out??
did u watch the game. ..di u notice that almost all of our players where awfull in that game..i aoly liked marchisio and. . .nobody
but anyways we took away poulsen. . .and we lost the entire midfield..he was playing awfull? . . .yes. . .but face it its true, camoranesi did nothing and we totally lloose that game when he arrives
I give Ranieri alot of stick, but I wont give him one for taking a risk on Camo in a game we were playing awful, and that needed a change. We needed that change, it was risky, but we played better after that change, even if more fragile.