I didn't compare anything, I found that page googling.
But then I doubt Windows 2000 as a server platform is radically different and would yield very different results to Windows 2003 Server had that been tested instead.
++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++
I didn't compare anything, I found that page googling.
But then I doubt Windows 2000 as a server platform is radically different and would yield very different results to Windows 2003 Server had that been tested instead.
XP isn't a significant modification of Windows 2000. It would yield much the same results. My anti-virus software for the Windows partition is even convinced I'm running 2000!