Chapel hill murders (4 Viewers)

[ReBeL]

....

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Seven]

Forget about me, and reply to the idea, Seven. Do you think it is wrong?

Of course it's wrong. You seem to have never seen Obama on tv. He has NEVER cried for three continous hours. And he NEVER will.

Like I said, you're completely delusional. The level of insanity you have reached these past few days is incredible. You used to be a smart guy, Reb. What the fuck happened?

 

[ReBeL]

Of course it's wrong. You seem to have never seen Obama on tv. He has NEVER cried for three continous hours. And he NEVER will.

Like I said, you're completely delusional. The level of insanity you have reached these past few days is incredible. You used to be a smart guy, Reb. What the $#@! happened?

Midlife crisis, maybe

- - - Updated - - -

.....

 

[GordoDeCentral]

The police are allowed to presume during an investigation. It's part of their job.

what investigation? he was already charged by then, their job is done.

 

[ReBeL]

Does anybody know any details about this incident in Sweden?

 

[Maddy]

Does anybody know any details about this incident in Sweden?

The title on the video

And yes a lot of people knows about this incident.

What on earth is this muslim bullshit victim card. As if his religion has anything to do with the security guards disgusting behaviour.

And the youtube channel DOAM

Holy fuck the brainwash is stronk in soem.

 

[Enron]

what investigation? he was already charged by then, their job is done.

There's plenty of follow up to be done once charges are brought. Don't worry, the police aren't doing anything out of the ordinary.

 

[Maddy]

There's plenty of follow up to be done once charges are brought. Don't worry, the police aren't doing anything out of the ordinary.

 

[Enron]

They're also allowed to answer questions of the media in regards to any number of facets to the case including and not limited to motive. It's almost alway speculation until it comes from the prosecutor, but it's not a big deal.

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

....

Explain to me how this would be considered terrorism.

- - - Updated - - -

For all those who are saying "Why should Obama make a statement?

Well, give me a break. If these three were Jews, he would be having tears for three continuous hours on TV. Read how he cared about an immaterial random basketball player who passed away before three days, and guess where? In Chapel Hill:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/08/statement-president-passing-dean-smith

And take in consideration this player has died without anybody pushing him toward death.

But, no. He wouldn't.

 

[Mohad]

Explain to me how this would be considered terrorism.

- - - Updated - - -



But, no. He wouldn't.

What's the definition of terrorism to you?

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

What's the definition of terrorism to you?

There needs to be some sort of political goal.

 

[Mohad]

There needs to be some sort of political goal.

Like I thought, that's just a one part of what you usually hear whether from the media or the politicians. The main meaning of terrorism is to spread the fear between the people.

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

Like I thought, that's just a one part of what you usually hear wether from the media or the politicians. The main meaning of terrorism is to spread the fear between the people.

By definition it is political.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorism

Otherwise, you could argue every crime is terrorism.

 

[ReBeL]

There needs to be some sort of political goal.

What about the crimes that are of religious goal?

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

What about the crimes that are of religious goal?

They can overlap.

 

[ReBeL]

They can overlap.

And how did you judge this crime was not because of religion?

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

And how did you judge this crime was not because of religion?

Because it was an ongoing dispute over parking. I firmly 1038745638456% believe that no matter what religion they were, that asshole piece of shit would have shot and killed them. It wasn't because of their religion, it was because of the fight.

Something like this on the other hand...:
http://www.worldbulletin.net/news/145500/muslim-woman-thrown-off-moving-train-in-australia

 

[ReBeL]

Because it was an ongoing dispute over parking. I firmly 1038745638456% believe that no matter what religion they were, that asshole piece of $#@! would have shot and killed them. It wasn't because of their religion, it was because of the fight.

Something like this on the other hand...:
http://www.worldbulletin.net/news/145500/muslim-woman-thrown-off-moving-train-in-australia

I love how you conclude the result of an investigation that will take ages from police in just one minute to say that it is for sure over a stupid parking case, while you won't blink when somebody tells you the same about a stupid cartoon somewhere else. Pathetic to say the least.

 

[ALC]

I love how you conclude the result of an investigation that will take ages from police in just one minute to say that it is for sure over a stupid parking case, while you won't blink when somebody tells you the same about a stupid cartoon somewhere else. Pathetic to say the least.

How are you doing anything different by concluding it is religiously motivated? Pathetic, to say the least.