Carlos Alcaraz (21 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
Loan fee is between 4.1m and 5.7m (apparently its lower if we play him a lot, which we probably will given our lack of options) + agreed transfer fee is 49.5m, so around 55ish in total. No idea about salary, but the transfer would be paid across 3 years, so thats probably the minimum contract length. I fail to see logic in this deal, it looked weird in Jan and looks even worse now.
pay attention turk, that 60m combined (which will reach ~80m with bonuses if we don't get relegated to serie c while he's here) is so high because both the player and the agent owes giuntoli a lot for this marvelous opportunity of money laundering, stealing and corruption
giuntoli the true heir of marotta. i bet you have a valid legal claim on both guys' yachts they stole at your expense
giuntoli the true heir of marotta. i bet you have a valid legal claim on both guys' yachts they stole at your expense
You worry too much.
These specific details means he must prove his worth and if he does - We will be lucky to pay that sum.
This however has another path - Should he not prove his worth - He will go back and we just paid a relatively high loan (IIRC).
I would like to see us getting a new manager and then assess him under a new guidance - A non Jihad football might change the way he contributes.
Juve should probably pick Motta as his wages shouldnt be sky high.
Reality wise - Our management will probably go for Conte - Which should be very good in the short term.
These specific details means he must prove his worth and if he does - We will be lucky to pay that sum.
This however has another path - Should he not prove his worth - He will go back and we just paid a relatively high loan (IIRC).
I would like to see us getting a new manager and then assess him under a new guidance - A non Jihad football might change the way he contributes.
Juve should probably pick Motta as his wages shouldnt be sky high.
Reality wise - Our management will probably go for Conte - Which should be very good in the short term.
Especially when they are actually trolling.“I will explain. We needed to bring in a lad who would not disturb the squad that we were very happy with, so a young player with good prospects. The opportunity arrived 48 hours before the deadline and we did not have time to negotiate the release clause.
“We have great respect for his club and at the right moment will sit down to discuss the options.”
There is also a clause in the loan meaning that the more he plays, the less Juve pay, so why isn’t he playing?
“He just arrived, is very young and lacks experience at this level. When you negotiate a loan fee, you try to protect yourself, for instance if he is injured,” added Giuntoli.
“It was a ‘light’ economic move, he has already come off the bench twice. We did not need a starter, but someone who could fill that slot with prospects for the future.”
“We have great respect for his club and at the right moment will sit down to discuss the options.”
There is also a clause in the loan meaning that the more he plays, the less Juve pay, so why isn’t he playing?
“He just arrived, is very young and lacks experience at this level. When you negotiate a loan fee, you try to protect yourself, for instance if he is injured,” added Giuntoli.
“It was a ‘light’ economic move, he has already come off the bench twice. We did not need a starter, but someone who could fill that slot with prospects for the future.”
