Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (18 Viewers)
- Thread starter gsol
- Start date
Carraro: 'Juventus cheated in ’98'
By Football Italia staff
Former FIGC President Franco Carraro says the 1998 Scudetto was won unfairly by Juventus as he discusses the Calciopoli verdicts.
The Supreme Court gave its final ruling on the scandal this week, nine years after it initially broke, with some charges dropped and other passing the statute of limitations.
“My thoughts on Calciopoli are complex,” Carraro - who was forced to quit as Federation President over the scandal - told La Repubblica.
“Was there a shady network enveloping football? The judgements say yes, and we must stand by the judgements.
“Unlike what happened in ’98, Juventus had the strongest team in [winning] the two Leagues, and won on the field, not due to interference.
“That said, there were many things that were not right. And in ’98? Please, that, for me, was the only championship which was really distorted in favour of Juventus, remember the penalty [not given] on Ronaldo?
“Returning to Calciopoli, there were actions from the club which put the results in doubt. In the end - among other things - the judgement against Juventus is the result of a plea bargain.
“So I think it’s inappropriate for Juventus to ask for compensation. To plea bargain for a sanction and then claim damages is the schizophrenic behaviour of someone who wants to have their cake and eat it too.”
Carraro was overheard saying that Lazio must be helped to avoid relegation during the Calciopoli wiretaps, prompting his resignation, but the 75-year-old insists he was taken out of context.
“My phonecall about Lazio-Brescia must be understood in conjunction with another call where I explicitly said 'If Brescia is the strongest, they win.’
“This was in the days where the newspapers were full of talk about the damage done to Lazio, and I wanted to defend the Federation from suspicion of being involved.
“The same is true of Inter-Juve, my call was simply the action of a Federation President who knows that in that sensitive situation you can’t afford a game in which things go in favour of Juve.
“I simply saw a danger to the Federation and I took responsibility and intervened.
“Anyway, I want to make clear I was acquitted of all charges, by the court in Naples, the sporting judiciary and the TAR in Lazio.

“I resigned because I made mistakes in sporting policy. My presence would have weakened the institution so, even though no-one asked me to, I resigned.”
By Football Italia staff
Former FIGC President Franco Carraro says the 1998 Scudetto was won unfairly by Juventus as he discusses the Calciopoli verdicts.
The Supreme Court gave its final ruling on the scandal this week, nine years after it initially broke, with some charges dropped and other passing the statute of limitations.
“My thoughts on Calciopoli are complex,” Carraro - who was forced to quit as Federation President over the scandal - told La Repubblica.
“Was there a shady network enveloping football? The judgements say yes, and we must stand by the judgements.
“Unlike what happened in ’98, Juventus had the strongest team in [winning] the two Leagues, and won on the field, not due to interference.
“That said, there were many things that were not right. And in ’98? Please, that, for me, was the only championship which was really distorted in favour of Juventus, remember the penalty [not given] on Ronaldo?
“Returning to Calciopoli, there were actions from the club which put the results in doubt. In the end - among other things - the judgement against Juventus is the result of a plea bargain.
“So I think it’s inappropriate for Juventus to ask for compensation. To plea bargain for a sanction and then claim damages is the schizophrenic behaviour of someone who wants to have their cake and eat it too.”
Carraro was overheard saying that Lazio must be helped to avoid relegation during the Calciopoli wiretaps, prompting his resignation, but the 75-year-old insists he was taken out of context.
“My phonecall about Lazio-Brescia must be understood in conjunction with another call where I explicitly said 'If Brescia is the strongest, they win.’
“This was in the days where the newspapers were full of talk about the damage done to Lazio, and I wanted to defend the Federation from suspicion of being involved.
“The same is true of Inter-Juve, my call was simply the action of a Federation President who knows that in that sensitive situation you can’t afford a game in which things go in favour of Juve.
“I simply saw a danger to the Federation and I took responsibility and intervened.
“Anyway, I want to make clear I was acquitted of all charges, by the court in Naples, the sporting judiciary and the TAR in Lazio.

“I resigned because I made mistakes in sporting policy. My presence would have weakened the institution so, even though no-one asked me to, I resigned.”
Yesterday I have spent a good 45 minutes listening to a live radio interview he released. He was mentioning this fact, so I am thinking yes, he will do. He was MD in Juve for 12 years, he must have some money saved. Though, nine years of legal prosecutions have for sure not been cheap. Regardless of the return of the 28th and 29th, I really really hope he will get cleared of all charges there, he deserves it. Without him, his lawyers and some hard core Juve lovers, we would have never found out about the truth on this gigantic Fraud.
Juve drew on purpose because they know Inter were psychologically damaged and wouldn't profit.
Plus, if I remember correctly wasn't Ronaldo's penalty in the first half? Of course instead of playing and fighting for the win (when they had enough time to even win let alone draw) they were prostituting on the sidelines.
Plus, if I remember correctly wasn't Ronaldo's penalty in the first half? Of course instead of playing and fighting for the win (when they had enough time to even win let alone draw) they were prostituting on the sidelines.
I'm not going to 
. I just found it funny, because I think we can all agree that there are certain republican media who are far worse in that sense.
. I just found it funny, because I think we can all agree that there are certain republican media who are far worse in that sense.
Every Inter fan I know is deeply frustrated about 1998. To be honest I really don't see why. Obviously there was contact between Ronaldo and Iuliano. I am not convinced it was a penalty though. More like an obstruction really. The foul on Del Piero is there and I don't think anyone can deny it's a clear cut penalty.
of course they are frustrated because they have been nothing but a loser club who will clutch onto every small bit of wrong doing against them to justify their failure as a club, of course nobody will mention the foul on Del Piero though, or even why collina insisted on proceeding the game in perugia when the pitch was clearly unplayable
- - - Updated - - -
was the luciano/eriberto passport scandal inter's or chievo's doing?
- - - Updated - - -
was the luciano/eriberto passport scandal inter's or chievo's doing?