Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (48 Viewers)

[Tommy]

I loved how those interisti at SKY were showing Capello's honours and told him what's missing(meaning does he want to win more, a world cup, etc...) and he shut them up saying you guys forgot the 2 scudetti I won with Juve, you forgot those. They didn't know what to say after that.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Juventino★★★]

inter merda

 

[AngelaL]

Yeah, but the FIGC prosecutor's report (the latest one incriminating Inter and Milan for serious breaches) actually reaffirmed Juventus' supposed guilt - as baseless as it is. So, the scenario would be, a thief stole a painting and in turn was robbed of it himself. When the second thief is caught, does the first thief have a right to demand its return? Not really.

It would not be polite to say what I think of moRATti's lapdog's report. I watched every Serie A game I could in 2005/6 season, not just Juve. Juve did not cheat! They won that Scudetti on the field, as they did the 2004/5 one.

Which ever stance nets them the most money.

That's probably true!

It's nothing to do with them because no aspect of EU is involved in this.

Sorry Andy, I'm no lawyer! Your answer is too succinct for me. I think from Juve's point of view, there is more than just the Scudetti involved. The kangaroo court Rossi conducted, violated the defendants rights to defend themselves properly, they were not allowed to examine the 'evidence', other evidence was deliberately withheld that could have affected the case, & there was a conflict of interest. Juventus lost their Scudetti, were demoted, lost their good name and a whole lot of revenue, because of this farce.

I do understand that they would have to go through the Italian courts first, but assuming that they exhaust those options, are you saying that Juve cannot take any aspect of Farsiopoli that affected them to the EU court or just the titles?

And I'm curious. Re the example 'Picasso painting' theft: - would the thief get to keep the painting or would the 'rightful owner' get their property back? (Assuming no insurance pay out)

 

[Max]

Oh my God, Angela is back. :toast:

 

[AngelaL]

inter merda

Yeah! I know we all think he's 'pig ugly' but, you know, we really ought to apologize .....


to pigs for associating that scumbag with them!

 

[adriano_c]

I watched every Serie A game I could in 2005/6 season, not just Juve. Juve did not cheat! They won that Scudetti on the field, as they did the 2004/5 one.

No shit.

 

[Juventino★★★]

moratti gaga

 

[Juventino★★★]

Yeah! I know we all think he's 'pig ugly' but, you know, we really ought to apologize .....


to pigs for associating that scumbag with them!

true

 

[adriano_c]

We're very close to the 27th and yet no substantiated reports as to what the supposed revelation is about?

I'm prepared for disappointment.

 

[Max]

Were you really expecting anything of substance? How many times have you heard the same shit over and over: "...big revelation...change the perspective of Calciopoli...big repercussions..." and then we find out on revealing day that it has been pushed to a date six months later. Yawn.

 

[JuveJay]

It hasn't happened yet, just saying...

Let's judge on the 27th. Moggi didn't say 'I've got some big news which will break on the 27th, but you'll probably hear it beforehand despite this being part of a judicial process'.

 

[ThirdStar]

We're very close to the 27th and yet no substantiated reports as to what the supposed revelation is about?

I'm prepared for disappointment.

Why are you expecting anything lol ?

Hell even if he shows a video of Moratti drawing on a board his farsopoli plan, I still wouldn't expect anything to happen.

 

[gsol]

Indeed it was reaffirmed. The entire accusation of a "Moggi system" (as contradictory as the claim is in light of those made against the other teams by him), in fact, remains in his report.

-edit.

http://media2.gazzetta.it/gazzetta/content/2011/pdf/Palazzi_su_scudetto_06.pdf

Skip down to page 13.

I read this, in fact I posted it here. Don't be tricked by their ability to spin shit into gold. The fact that other teams were discovered killed the exclusivity claim that founded the initial sentence. They can't say that though for one simple reason. They had (mere weeks before) announced that Moggi and Giraudo were banned for life and have since made it clear that they do not intend on changing that. If they came out and admitted that Moggi’s ban was a mistake he could request reinstatement etc. etc.

The revelations did not confirm Moggi’s guilt, at least not by any logical standard. They may have tried to salvage the theory to appear as though they nonetheless made the right decisions but it is all counterintuitive.

 

[Mark]

November 28th 2004.

Bergamo(ref designator) to Rodomonti(ref). 3 hours before inter-Juve.

"There is a difference of 15pts between the leader Juve and inter so when in doubt think about the club that's far instead of the one on top."

Game would end 2-2.



That's a clear signal to help inter and breaks article 6 right?(not sure cause it's coming from the ref designator and not Moratti and cie) Another one form the honest club? Impossible!

 

[Fake Melo]

I read this, in fact I posted it here. Don't be tricked by their ability to spin shit into gold. The fact that other teams were discovered killed the exclusivity claim that founded the initial sentence. They can't say that though for one simple reason. They had (mere weeks before) announced that Moggi and Giraudo were banned for life and have since made it clear that they do not intend on changing that. If they came out and admitted that Moggi’s ban was a mistake he could request reinstatement etc. etc.

The revelations did not confirm Moggi’s guilt, at least not by any logical standard. They may have tried to salvage the theory to appear as though they nonetheless made the right decisions but it is all counterintuitive.

I can't believe people like Marcotti are saying that Moggi controlled all but Moratti and co just played along

 

[Hust]

November 28th 2004.

Bergamo(ref designator) to Rodomonti(ref). 3 hours before inter-Juve.

"There is a difference of 15pts between the leader Juve and inter so when in doubt think about the club that's far instead of the one on top."
Game would end 2-2.



That's a clear signal to help inter and breaks article 6 right?(not sure cause it's coming from the ref designator and not Moratti and cie) Another one form the honest club? Impossible!

THOSE MOTHERFuCKERS!

 

[gsol]

It's article 6 alright. It is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the impartiality of the referee. Tying it back to Inter might be an issue though. That is Bergamo's violation and Carraro's as well since he gave similar advice to Bergamo. If they can link a Facchetti/Moratti discussion to Carraro, Bergamo, or Rodomonti it would be their violation as well but we already saw Facchetti violate that so it would make little difference.

What this really does is prove that Inter were not getting the short end of the stick from referees and Juventus were definitely not being favored. If Moggi ran the league through his system, that discussion between a referee and high ranking officials would not have occurred. What this also does in my view is show that Bergamo was just shining Moggi on in their discussions. All Bergamo ever did with Moggi was promise that all would be fair but this call proves otherwise.

 

[Mark]

He(Bergamo) even adds something like this, do that because it'll be good for you career.


meaning helping inter would benefit him(the ref).

but like Auricchio said, no inter calls, not important...yeah right!!!

 

[Hust]

It's article 6 alright. It is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the impartiality of the referee. Tying it back to Inter might be an issue though. That is Bergamo's violation and Carraro's as well since he gave similar advice to Bergamo. If they can link a Facchetti/Moratti discussion to Carraro, Bergamo, or Rodomonti it would be their violation as well but we already saw Facchetti violate that so it would make little difference.

What this really does is prove that Inter were not getting the short end of the stick from referees and Juventus were definitely not being favored. If Moggi ran the league through his system, that discussion between a referee and high ranking officials would not have occurred. What this also does in my view is show that Bergamo was just shining Moggi on in their discussions. All Bergamo ever did with Moggi was promise that all would be fair but this call proves otherwise.

I could kill right now.

 

[JuveJay]

Moggi system