Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (66 Viewers)

adriano_c

Senior Member
May 26, 2009
6,540
No, to the FIGC Juventus is still guilty, despite our punishment being the result of a supposed exclusive rapport which in itself is debunked by their own acknowledgement that Inter "should" have been punished as well.
 

adriano_c

Senior Member
May 26, 2009
6,540
Not exactly, their comments concerning Inter have to do more so with their unpunished guilt. The issue, for them (all this this is a facade, anyway), and for us (according to Agnelli's comments lately), have to do with equal treatment, i.e., equal punishment.
 

ThirdStar

You know it's comin'
Jul 5, 2011
1,291
If we supposedly get the title, Calciopoli would be a joke and at least it'll clear us of the "cheating" allegations. Which we never did. I don't care about all the fines or anything. We won our title on the field god dammit
 

Juve_fanatic

Second coolest member!
Apr 5, 2006
7,618
What bothers me the most is that the Interistas are not just saying that we have cheated in 2006 or 2005, but they keep saying that every title won after 1980 has been fixed by Juve....Now, im trying to figure out how a person who has a normal mind would say such a thing....I keep looking at players that have played for Juve and players that have played for Inter throughout history and to be honest, when you compare the two teams we look like fucking Barcelona or Man Utd compared to fucking Deportivo or Totenhem.....That is something that you can not fix.....lets not talk about the time we won the Scudetto with that DP bycycle kick to Trez's head against Milan.....You just cant fix those kind of things....so FUCK YOU INTER AND WHO LOVE THEM!!!!
 

Catenaccio

Senior Member
Jul 15, 2002
3,363
Given the new evidence and the fact that the FIGC "intended" to revoke the 2006 scudetto but could not do so because of the statute of limitations, then Inter should either hand back the title or a higher body needs to get involved - such as CONI, FIFA or UEFA.

Teams such as Fiorentina, Juventus, Milan and the others punished for Calciopoli DESERVE some form of compensation because Inter enjoyed the financial benefits from the TV rights sharing agreement from the year that Juventus was in Serie B.

Agnelli has every legal right to pursue this further. The football world knows now that we are not a bunch of cry babies.....but we do have a right to be treated fairly. There is no doubt in my mind that Juventus was unfairly punished as they were just as guilty as other teams involved (in fact it was said that Inter were even more so as they committed fraud as apposed to Juventus).

Juventus will now go from the most hated side in Italy (aside from Juve fans), to the side with the most apathy while Inter is now the undisputed villan.

You may see referee decisions going against Inter more this season - my hunch. They won't win the title this year thats for sure....I hope they have a miserable season.

Mark my words though....it may not happen this year or this decade even, but you will see that eventually that 2006 title will be revoked. There is even a decent chance it could be returned to Juventus or given to Roma (as they would have been the next in line to receive the title).
 
Mar 28, 2007
2,272
gsol, can i ask you.. if FIGC cant take 2006 scudetto back because of a statute of limitations then why FIGC can ban moggi for life this year? arent it statute of limitations as well?
 
OP
gsol

gsol

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2007
1,448
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #12,534
    Short answer, they can do whatever they want.

    Long answer, stop reading FI and other bullshit. They keep saying Inter won’t get the title revoked because of the statute of limitations and it is annoying me how inaccurate they are. The statute is the reason Inter won’t get punished for their calls as in points, relegation etc. The title not being stripped has little to do with the statute and is directly related to the fact that the FIGC never officially headed it to them in the first place. They are arguing that it is not their place to revoke something they never gave to start with.

    Moggi’s banning happened within the 5 years (barely). With him there was a 5 year suspension and a lifetime ban option that lasted 5 years. Just before it expired they exercised it.
     

    bleach

    Junior Member
    Jul 18, 2011
    109
    Short answer, they can do whatever they want.

    Long answer, stop reading FI and other bullshit. They keep saying Inter won’t get the title revoked because of the statute of limitations and it is annoying me how inaccurate they are. The statute is the reason Inter won’t get punished for their calls as in points, relegation etc. The title not being stripped has little to do with the statute and is directly related to the fact that the FIGC never officially headed it to them in the first place. They are arguing that it is not their place to revoke something they never gave to start with.

    Moggi’s banning happened within the 5 years (barely). With him there was a 5 year suspension and a lifetime ban option that lasted 5 years. Just before it expired they exercised it.
    Fu...ck f1 and Gashiit dello-crap, full of shit can go fuck themselves, fucking cunts
     

    solojuve1897

    Mille Grazie Pavel
    Sep 17, 2008
    391
    Short answer, they can do whatever they want.

    Long answer, stop reading FI and other bullshit. They keep saying Inter won’t get the title revoked because of the statute of limitations and it is annoying me how inaccurate they are. The statute is the reason Inter won’t get punished for their calls as in points, relegation etc. The title not being stripped has little to do with the statute and is directly related to the fact that the FIGC never officially headed it to them in the first place. They are arguing that it is not their place to revoke something they never gave to start with.

    Moggi’s banning happened within the 5 years (barely). With him there was a 5 year suspension and a lifetime ban option that lasted 5 years. Just before it expired they exercised it.
    Just wanted to check if you have looked up which calls Palazzi defined as article 6 yet?

    Regards,
     

    Jem83

    maitre'd at Canal Bar
    Nov 7, 2005
    22,870
    Nice to see that Enrico Lubrano, a law professor at the University in Rome, is taking such an interest in the matter. He made a statement a couple of weeks ago as well, saying that the sport's law under no circumstance would be in the way of revoking the 2006-scudetto from merda, which is FIGC's excuse. Now that very same Lubrano has come forward once again, reiterating his statement. As the Juve legal team is continuing their work, building their case, it's good to know that an expert in law (and more importantly: sport's law), supports the case.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 60)