Getting the scudetti back+punishing Inter isn't logical, is it?
If we get the scudetti back that will mean that we weren't guilty, which automatically will mean that Inter aren't guilty. If Inter are punished, then it will be a confirmation that what we did was also a punishable offence so the scudetti can't be given back to us.
If we get the scudetti back that will mean that we weren't guilty, which automatically will mean that Inter aren't guilty. If Inter are punished, then it will be a confirmation that what we did was also a punishable offence so the scudetti can't be given back to us.
That is how I see it, provided both clubs were doing much the same thing.
What are we expecting tomorrow? Why is it the big day?
If you are referring to the Roma scandal there isn’t much to it. Sensi bought Rolexes and other expensive gifts for all the referees, linesmen and designators in 2000 and admitted to it stating that they were for Christmas (apparently Christmas happens for Romanisti in September). He got a slap on the wrist fine and that was that. The league even did him a favour when Giraudo called Roma out on the fact that they had too many foreign players to be within league regulations. The league decided to increase the number of permitted foreigners in May which validated the Roma goal that Nakata scored against Juve weeks earlier and a month later Roma celebrated the scudetto with 2 points more than us.
Truth is nothing would happen to Roma then because they are “owned” by Sensi who is owned by Capitalia (bank) through massive debts. The joke over there is that Sensi doesn’t even really own the socks on his feet. At the time Carraro was the president of the FIGC and was simultaneously on the board of directors at Capitalia so he had a personal interest in keeping Roma as profitable as possible.
On a side note Lazio is also partially owned by Capitalia through their financing of Lotito’s assets and that may explain Carraro’s demands to Bergamo in the 2006 wiretaps where he says “for Lazio you call the penalty even if it isn’t there!” They were battling in the relegation zone at the time. Sounds like a Pro Juve league to me.
Truth is nothing would happen to Roma then because they are “owned” by Sensi who is owned by Capitalia (bank) through massive debts. The joke over there is that Sensi doesn’t even really own the socks on his feet. At the time Carraro was the president of the FIGC and was simultaneously on the board of directors at Capitalia so he had a personal interest in keeping Roma as profitable as possible.
On a side note Lazio is also partially owned by Capitalia through their financing of Lotito’s assets and that may explain Carraro’s demands to Bergamo in the 2006 wiretaps where he says “for Lazio you call the penalty even if it isn’t there!” They were battling in the relegation zone at the time. Sounds like a Pro Juve league to me.

Love the posts though.
