Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (54 Viewers)

OP
gsol

gsol

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2007
1,448
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,561
    I agree Molinaro should have been forward but that doesn't mean that the goal was onside. It would only have been more obvious had he been up a step. In any case it was offside and I am yet to see a single replay that shows ball contact prior to player contact. All replays here and elsewhere have thus far confirmed teh opposite.
     

    Buy on AliExpress.com
    OP
    gsol

    gsol

    Senior Member
    Oct 14, 2007
    1,448
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,564
    Not to mention that there are 4 or 5 trials going on as we speak. It's far from over.
     

    Amaurisimo

    Senior Member
    Dec 8, 2007
    4,622
    Look, just watch the footage again. Those three decisive calls were even hard to judge with freaking replays. The first two, namely the Spinesi goal and the first Del Piero trip, were very hard to judge, and both players seemingly had half of their bodies on and offsides if you look at the grass lines.

    The Del Piero penalty looked like a penalty but if you watch closely the defender, I think it was Biagianti, slightly touched the ball. The trip happened AFTER he touched the ball. Therefore not a penalty.

    Either way, it was tough to call, but there is no conspiracy here. Case closed.

    PS - Spinesi's goal was Molinaro's fault for even being there so close to Spinesi and not goal-side.
    Im with you on this Andy in regards to , its hard to judge with replays.
    However, DP penalty was there even on close up as u could see that left DP foot was fouled. DP did jump thinking that he is mine field, but it was the penalty.

    Molinaro's fault of course, with or without offside, as he should follow game bit better
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 47)