Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (72 Viewers)

[gsol]

Want the link?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Chazz]

He touches the ball first.

Fact

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

I have a suggestion.re-open controversy thread and if somebody start throwing insults warn him instead of closing thread.

 

[JCK]

gsol, I don't want any link. I have links, videos, seen it live, seen it on replays and now I took a sequence of shots for you to see what happened.

 

[JCK]

gsol, notice how the difference between the third and the fourth picture is only Del Piero.The ball is there the defender's leg is still on the ball only Del Piero moved to the left over the defender's leg and DIVED!

 

[Salvatore]

That is quality

 

[gsol]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkkYYP7nJaA&eurl=http://www.lucalcio.com/

Done.

None of your still frames show the foot on the ball...why didn't you find that one?

Regardless. From that angle you can't tell if the foot touches the ball first or if the leg touches the player first.

The point is Del Piero's legs were taken out from behind as the video indicates and for those who don't speak Italian, the commentator also agreed that the goal was offside.

 

[Marc]

Del Piero was tripped. Even if the defender touched the ball 1st, Del Piero could have still reached it but he didn´t because he was tripped. Hence the penalty is correct.

 

[JCK]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkkYYP7nJaA&eurl=http://www.lucalcio.com/

Done.

That link shows me again the same thing I posted. The defender reaches the ball FIRST, while still at the ball Del Piero moves towards the defender's legs and dives. You just proved that what I am saying is right. We were awarded and inexistent penalty.

 

[JCK]

Del Piero was tripped. Even if the defender touched the ball 1st, Del Piero could have still reached it but he didn´t because he was tripped. Hence the penalty is correct.

Yes, Del Piero tripped himself over a leg. The defender did what he was supposed to do and reach the ball.

 

[Red]

I was a soft penalty decision but, as Catania's goal was offside, justice was done in the end.

 

[JCK]

I was a soft penalty decision but, as Catania's goal was offside, justice was done in the end.

Except that Catania's goal was not offside. Molinaro cover Spinesi all the time until the ball leaves Mascara's foot. Spinesi's arm was the only part offside and this is not enough for it to be called an offside.

 

[gsol]

Jack if you watch that video and see a dive than I can't help you. It proved me and the ref and the commentators right...not you. Contact with DPs legs from behind and a correct penalty. Change the subject now.

 

[gsol]

Except that Catania's goal was not offside. Molinaro cover Spinesi all the time until the ball leaves Mascara's foot. Spinesi's arm was the only part offside and this is not enough for it to be called an offside.

Anything to disagree with me huh buddy. It was offside. Knock it off. The video is there for all to see and whoever understands the comentating can confirm that they too agree it was offside.

 

[serfaraaz]

can anybody comment on the controversial decision given to inter agaisnt siena were they right or wrong

 

[Red]

Except that Catania's goal was not offside. Molinaro cover Spinesi all the time until the ball leaves Mascara's foot. Spinesi's arm was the only part offside and this is not enough for it to be called an offside.

Hard to tell.

I thought the right side of his body was beyond Molinaro.

 

[Zé Tahir]

Catania's goal was offside, no if's or but's about it.

 

[serfaraaz]

Anything to disagree with me huh buddy. It was offside. Knock it off. The video is there for all to see and whoever understands the comentating can confirm that they too agree it was offside.

what about chiellini penalty shout

 

[gsol]

can anybody comment on the controversial decision given to inter agaisnt siena were they right or wrong

The first goal was a 50/50 ball that shouldn't have been awarded. That was definitely wrong.

Cambiasso's goal went out of bounds before being scored but to be honest I haven't seen a decent camera angle yet. Tough to call.

Third goal was fine.

 

[serfaraaz]

The first goal was a 50/50 ball that shouldn't have been awarded. That was definitely wrong.

Cambiasso's goal went out of bounds before being scored but to be honest I haven't seen a decent camera angle yet. Tough to call.

Third goal was fine.

why do u think refrees are giving decision in favour of inter