Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (49 Viewers)

OP
gsol

gsol

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2007
1,448
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,902
    denco
    well Desailly played for Milan, do you expect him to say Milan cheated
    Desailly is a credible source to him because he said what Denco wants to hear.

    Anyone else notice that he's finally admitting that the trial was a farce. He just condones it because Moggi was somehow evil.
     

    Triptonite

    Junior Member
    Jun 12, 2007
    168
    I think that Denco lives in a "pink" world that football teams are about the pure game and nothing more. The papers are objective and write "naked truth.

    After the trial Mogi said that the next period is about the dominance of Milan teams, and that is what happened.

    I really believe the facts stated by gsol and all that is very logical.

    We were not the only bad ones.

    I only wonder how this could happen to our triade. I was sure that they had power to make counter-measures, or to protect the club but I guess, something else was "in the game too".

    And it is always that to one event , people have different views. To some previous state by Denco that our captain was unfairly benched by Capello just to make draws and poor results, here by ancient loyal Juve fans, was thought as one of the greatest moves of Capello, to bring a player back to a master level, which happened, DP was playing great again. But, that is our (some group od 6 Juventini regular) opinion.
    Anyone else can have different opinion.

    Thanx Gsol for the thorough inside view of the farsopoli:bow:
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,984
    Your analysis of our 29th title is not only opinion based but stems from a person who is definitely removed from competitive sport. If going on a losing streak is “fixed” then we can pretty much arrest everyone in a pair of skates or cleats. You just brought up yet another foundationless article and are still dancing around the obvious. Now we were match fixing to lose and make Serie A more interesting. That must be why they lost to Arsenal too. Generate interest. Cute. Ok I'm going to go to work now and get fired...to generate interest.
    :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,984
    Who gives a fuck what Desailly said? What is he going to do, tell the world that his side cheated during one of the most successful spells in their history? Get real.
     

    pitbull

    Senior Member
    Jul 26, 2007
    11,045
    I think that Denco lives in a "pink" world that football teams are about the pure game and nothing more. The papers are objective and write "naked truth.

    After the trial Mogi said that the next period is about the dominance of Milan teams, and that is what happened.

    I really believe the facts stated by gsol and all that is very logical.

    We were not the only bad ones.
    Better read what denco has to say before you post smth about his opinion. :faq1:

    Mine opinion is, that Moggi and the rest of our directors did some things wrong, but it cant be called cheating or match fixing, they just offended some laws like etiquette about relationships between club directors and refferees. Taking our two scudettos were much too hard, as every club on Serie A had some little dirty things. I dont like to think that Serie A was corrupted as hell, its image was created because of italian mentality, because newspapers was talking about referees from week to week. About situation now - i dont know what to think. I just feel it unfair the way we were threated and watching how badly referees is doing from week to week i want some blood - from collina, from inter, who is the winner of this situation, hell, even Lega Calcio deserves some slaps abot this nonsense. But still - its not like in Latvia, were there are reals proofs about federation linkage with totalizators. I stopped watching our highest league because of these damn betting sites and i dont want to stop watching serie a, this is why i still believe in italian football.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,984
    I don't know why exactly this thread was set to be unmoderated at one point in time. Seems like a ploy to destroy the credibility of what is being discussed in here by gsol. That's just my opinion.
     

    C4ISR

    Senior Member
    Dec 18, 2005
    2,362
    On the topic of common sense. Some people questioned la gazzetta's link with Inter so I wanted to post these links regarding who is who.

    The Gazzetta's links to Inter can mainly be attributed to one person. Carlo Buora. This man was the VP of Pirelli and is now the VP of Telecom Italia. Both companies have historical ties with Inter directors Tronchetti and Moratti (Tronchetti owns Pirelli and Moratti owns Inter while both sit on Telecom-Italia's Board of Directors). Carlo is also the President of RCS Media Group which owns Gazzetta Dello Sport, Corriere Dello Sport, Correire Della Sera and now Tuttosport as well among others. For a long time Carlo was actually president of Inter as well.

    http://www.key4biz.it/Who_is_who/2007/02/Buora_Carlo.html
    http://www.rcsmediagroup.it/wps/portal/mg/business/newspapers?language=en
    http://www.inter.it/aas/news/reader?L=it&N=35076&stringa="carlo buora"
    The RCS media group also has John Elkan, Franzo Grande Stevens and even Diego Della Valle on its board of directors. Im confused now.

    http://www.rcsmediagroup.it/wps/portal/mg/governance/boardandcommitees?language=en
     

    ZAF3000

    Senior Member
    Feb 14, 2005
    5,348
    Is that not the game that Milan got deducted points for and was it not their contention that Meani is not part of their core members and that was why they did not get relegated?

    About this conversation did you get to listen to it or was it a transcript? And also about the phone convo if its illegal as you say to use it against Juventus then evidently it should be illegal to use it against Milan as well.

    I am only going by what you have said yourself.

    If no evidence was used according to you guys why was galliani suspended? Why were lazio and Fiorentina along with Regianna deducted points?

    Marcel Desailly said it on BBc Tv that Juventus have been cheating for years and all the players knew it.

    There is not a doubt in my mind that italian football is dirty so I do not understand why you guys are acting like everything was just fabricated against us
    If we take the ILLEGAL phone taps as evidence and Juve's relegation to serie b was just, then Milan should've been relegated to Serie C2.
    if we take the ILLEGAL phone taps as evidence and the punishment of match fixing is relegation Milan would have been in Serie B and Juve were to stay in serie A.
    If we take the phone taps being ILLEGAL and not as evidence then there is no trial at all. All teams stay in Serie A Juve to keep both titles fair and square.

    I am not here to discuss if Juve were innocenet or not. I am here to discuss IF THEY WERE GIVEN A FAIR TRIAL OR NOT. Clearly they weren't. I am not a law expert but there are basic things I know, and this trial was unjust.

    Looking at the evidence brought up in the trial and the outcome, I personally think (you can disagree if you want) that it was clear as glass that the whole point of such a trial is to bring Juve down. Milan and other teams getting some slaps on the hand as punishment were just collateral damages. In addition, this whole trial made Inter absolutely STRONG, plus it damaged almost all Serie A teams in a way that crippled them from being competitive.
    Summer 2006, Inter were kinda the only team capable of buying players in the mercato due to the fact that other teams were stuck in the Calcioploli. They got a good number of players at a very cheap budget.

    They got money for a trophy which they did not win. They got money from sponsers they do not deserve (since Juve got relegated)..


    And about cheating and match fixing, IF ILLEGAL PHONE TAP TRASCRIPTS which might have been manipulated couldn't find evidence that Juve match fixed, personally I can go sleep at night knowing that my team did not cheat.
     
    OP
    gsol

    gsol

    Senior Member
    Oct 14, 2007
    1,448
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,916

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,381
    If Calciopoli moved the weight from Juventus to Inter, saying that Inter are guilty now means exactly that Juventus were guilty back then.
     

    tibike

    Senior Member
    Dec 11, 2007
    1,147
    It seems to me, that there are, as ZAF pointed out, actually two discussions:
    1) Are/Were we guilty?
    2) Were we given a fair trial?

    And I think most of gsol's bashers concentrate mainly on the 1st one, but almost ignore the 2nd.
     

    Snoop

    Sabet is a nasty virgin
    Oct 2, 2001
    28,186
    It seems to me, that there are, as ZAF pointed out, actually two discussions:
    1) Are/Were we guilty?
    2) Were we given a fair trial?

    And I think most of gsol's bashers concentrate mainly on the 1st one, but almost ignore the 2nd.
    1 yes
    2 No! (comparing to the punishments other teams recieved)
     

    tibike

    Senior Member
    Dec 11, 2007
    1,147
    1 yes
    2 No! (comparing to the punishments other teams recieved)
    Yeah, I too think that we most likely did some illegal things, as well as other teams.
    But I believe, that the trial itself was unjust (as the evidence was probably illegal, as they changed the law because of the trial etc.) and that we were made the scapegoat.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 38)