Well to be fair he misses out on what Democracy is convincing himself that government = Democracy.
He thinks that Egyptian and Mesopotamian rulers were democratic even though these societies were at best Oligarchies.
He also assumes that the sanghas and ganas of India are historical fact, which they aren't.
-I'm not saying that Islam's Khalifas had democracy applied the same as we know now, but what came right after Muhammad PBUH was something the world never knew before, I'm saying it's the beginning of democracy as we know it now
as in voting and choosing who rules you, collecting money for HELPING the people (taxes as we know it now, although no one really knows where that money goes now)
but the freedom of speech wasn't present at that time for example, and freedom of faith was at moderate level, many different religions lived among Islam, but Abu Bakr faught those who converted back after Muhammad's death
(not because they changed belief, but because they threatened the plans Muslims had)
-Egyptian and Mesopotamian at what time in history exactly?
-I really know too little about India and Asian history, can't go any deep in that.