Board & Management (52 Viewers)

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,608
lmao there are direct quotes from wiretapes, caught our mgmt saying things like - it would be better if none saw those e-mails, etc. once again i will say, this might be harsh, but this imbeciles brought some of this on themselves.
 

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,608
This was our defence:

Also unfounded is the objection raised by the defense of FC Juventus SpA regarding the inadmissibility due to lateness of the revocation appeal by the federal
prosecutor.

First of all, FC Juventus SpA reported as anomalous the circumstance that the communication of transmission of the documentation by the Public Prosecutor's Office
of Turin had only taken place on 11/24/2022. However, such a transmission is documented and results from a special stamp followed by the signature of three
magistrates of the Public Prosecutor's Office of Turin. The doubts of FC Juventus SpA, on the subject, appear objectively out of place. The documentation deemed
relevant by the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office was received on 11.24.2022 and the appeal for revocation proposed on 12.22.2022 is certainly timely, having been
notified on the twenty-eighth day out of the thirty available (art. 63, paragraph 1, CGS).

- - - Updated - - -

So what's the story then we basically screwed and aint getting the points back?
No, we should be appealing now, but tbf this looks like a lost case anyway.
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Nobody had any doubt to begin with

JJ fans never had any doubt about JJ's innocence and banana peninsula's corruption
Rest of the banana peninsula never had any doubt about JJ's guilt

The purpose is to shit out some bla bla pages to make it seem more legit
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
lmao there are direct quotes from wiretapes, caught our mgmt saying things like - it would be better if none saw those e-mails, etc. once again i will say, this might be harsh, but this imbeciles brought some of this on themselves.
Wow, business correspondence isn't meant to be public?

LOCK THEM UP

I'm now leaving to read e-mails that Microsoft board members are sending around since they're public and it would be a crime otherwise
 

cimenk

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2008
3,129
lmao there are direct quotes from wiretapes, caught our mgmt saying things like - it would be better if none saw those e-mails, etc. once again i will say, this might be harsh, but this imbeciles brought some of this on themselves.
Do only us who wiretapped? If they said the mistake is that we planned it when doing plusvalenza and put certain X value as objective regardless of the player.

Do other clubs wiretapped? How can they do plusvalenza without plan and calculation? Do the value come out from the sky or random numbers ?
 

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,608
Do only us who wiretapped? If they said the mistake is that we planned it when doing plusvalenza and put certain X value as objective regardless of the player.

Do other clubs wiretapped? How can they do plusvalenza without plan and calculation? Do the value come out from the sky or random numbers ?
we were wiretapped for the other things - some shady doings with salaries of the players. No other club had that and this investigation found some evindence for plusvalenza case and shared it with the prosecutor of this case.
 

Valerio.

Senior Member
Jul 5, 2014
5,752
a lawyer saying that this is screwed up cause the rule for plusvalenze doesn't include points deduction but to do so they added art. 4 to deduct them points.
And said this can't be. Cause art 31 is a specific rule while art 4 is a abstract.
Rules says you can't go for Art 4 if there is already a rule about something....
 

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,608
a lawyer saying that this is screwed up cause the rule for plusvalenze doesn't include points deduction but to do so they added art. 4 to deduct them points.
And said this can't be. Cause art 31 is a specific rule while art 4 is a abstract.
Rules says you can't go for Art 4 if there is already a rule about something....
hopefully he is right, because the other argument, which i heard we could use in appeal (that the some documents were send to late) was already mentioned in this document and its saying it was legit.

Damn it looks like we are fucked anyway, im scared as fuck of that Prisma case. Fuck Agnelli, Paratici and the rest for making that possible though.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 31)