Board & Management (109 Viewers)

OP
.zero

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
80,770
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #4,165
    All of this make it seems like Exor, Jj mgmt, FIGC all but know that the ESL is not a matter of if, but wen.

    This is FIGC's way to tarnish Jj's history and have the last laugh before they leave the competitive shithole known as Serie A.
     

    Knowah

    Pool's Closed Due to Aids
    Jan 28, 2013
    5,956
    40 points??

    - - - Updated - - -

    Incredible that Man City and Barcelona, who are accused of far greater sins, are not hounded like us.
    Barca in particular is really proof of a different league. Spain will do anything for their big clubs, including glossing over sins and problems. Now some of them will still get punished but not to the degree we are hounded in Italy.

    It's sad.
     

    Boksic

    Senior Member
    May 11, 2005
    13,463
    Prosecutor asking for 40pts, so does that mean they give us 65pts in the end? Seems like that's how it worked in the plusvalenza case.

    I would ask what evidence they have but we all know it doesn't matter.

    They make it up as they go along and all concept of rules abd proportions go out the window.
     

    Strickland

    Senior Member
    May 17, 2019
    5,658
    Big points penalty for sporting loyalty? Thats like dishing out a season long ban for a player that didnt respect fair play and continued to play while an opponent was rolling on the grass or didnt shake someones hand.
     

    Scottish

    Zebrastreifenpferd
    Mar 13, 2011
    8,011
    Let's go Baby! :agnelli:

    - - - Updated - - -


    - - - Updated - - -

    “Juventus Football Club S.p.A. informs that the Federal Prosecutor’s Office before the F.I.G.C. (Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio) notified Juventus and some of its current and former officers the Notice of conclusion of investigations relating the so-called “2019/2020 sport season’s salary manoeuvre”, the so-called “2020/2021 sport season’s salary manoeuvre”, the relationships between the Company and certain sport agents, as well as certain alleged “partnership” between Juventus and other clubs. The Federal Prosecutor’s Office, also by virtue of alleged accounting violations, has hypothesized the violation of article 4, paragraph 1, of Sport Justice Code.

    By virtue of the reasons already explained, inter alia, in the Annual Financial Report at 30 June 2022 and in the Consolidated Half-Yearly Financial Report at 31 December 2022, the Company believes that it has correctly applied the relevant international accounting standards, as well as that it has operated in full compliance with sport loyalty’s principle. For further information, please refer to the aforementioned financial reports as well as the press releases issued by the Company on 2 December 2022 and 24 March 2023.

    It is pointed out that the Notice transmitted does not constitute the exercise of disciplinary action by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office; the Company will now be able to access the documentation and articulate its defenses within the terms provided by the Sport Justice Code.”
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 89)