Bench Discussion (15 Viewers)

OP
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,142
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #22
    ++ [ originally posted by Mr. Gol ] ++
    Kovac is clearly an improvement over Montero/Tudor/Legrottaglie. Giannichiedda is an improvement over Tacchinardi/Appiah, although not much. We finally have an adequate sub for Zambrotta (Chiellini), and for Nedved (Mutu). If we hadn't loaned Abbiati we'd be in 20th place by now.
    I have seen Giannichedda every time thus far and I still prefer Appiah and Tacchinardi...the guy just does not add anything.
     

    Erkka

    Senior Member
    Mar 31, 2004
    3,863
    #25
    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++
    This discussion is mostly about the options in midfield, as Kovac is indeed a good player. Now I don't buy this versatility argument you have going here...especially when Capello will always use the same players. Giannichedda is IMO not good enough for Juventus and apart from that we have no other options off the bench strictly for midfield, besides Blasi of course. Lack of creativity off the bench in midfield is another thing, however I will not go into that again.
    Then don't buy it, but honestly I don't believe in that argument at all. Yes, Capello have used the same players so far. So what, only 10 games have passed and the players' versatility hasn't gone anywhere. You know as well as I do that Zambrotta is an excellent midfielder too, not to mention Mutu. You even said it yourself in some match-topic. Real-life football isn't FM, you can't change the whole squad for every second game.

    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++
    Again, what happens when Vieira is missing? You say Emerson can cope without him in the big matches...are you sure about that cuz I'm not. Then if Camoranesi is out Capello will move Nedved to the right flank where he continues to fail miserably when given that role. Only bright spot is the prospect of giving Mutu a role on the left flank, which should be happening already.
    As for Vieira's absence, why wouldn't Juve handle it because they won the title last year too without him? Current squad is incredibly talented and most importantly non-dependant of any single player. It's by far the most important thing that Capello has achieved with Juve, it's something that Lippi couldn't do few years back (Nedved). What more could they prove to you? They even coped last year when both Trezeguet AND Zlatan were injured, not to mention Ibra's ridicilously long ban on spring. This years team has improved dramatically in the area that caused problems last season. Vieira, Chiellini, Mutu and the others bring everything that is needed. Now all Juve lacks is luck, when everyone is fit this team is unstoppable and has every chance to win every trophy available.

    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++
    And just because you do not concur with me in this matter does not mean my posts are lacking. I just have different feelings in this respect and it will be interesting to see how our team will cope in the latter stages of the CL without some key players...hopefully something we won't have to see. That said, I'm not convinced.
    As for Giannichedda and Blasi, what do they lack? They're perfect subs. Once again I'll ask, what the hell more do you people want? Makelele and Cambiasso as subs? Oh no, they're too one-dimensional too... :yawn: What more do they have to prove? Blasi is still young and in the latter stages of last season he failed simply because he couldn't yet play all the games for Juve. Early last season he was fantastic, I can't see any reason why he couldn't do the same now. Giannichedda is very similar to Tacchinardi, and to be honest I'd rather kept Tacchi on the summer because of his status and history with Juve. Well, Capello and Moggi decided otherwise and now Juve has another proven ball-winner as back-up. He's good enough, but not dazzling as you'd love to see. He's not very mediasexy but he does his job, time after time. I love his type of players, the furinos of the present time.

    Of course the absence of Vieira or Émerson or Camoranesi would has influence on the team, they're key players, no team in the world could replace them perfectly. It's a chance you've got to take. Incalculabity is the salt of football, it would be boring otherwise because Chelsea would win everything.

    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++
    What are you on about here, Erkka? Again, just because you see the team one way doesn't mean everybody concurs with you. Righteous martyr? :rolleyes:
    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++
    Not everybody shares your opinion, Erkka. Thought that would be rather obvious..
    Yes, of course it's obvious. But the record so far speaks for itself... And yes, I might be wrong here but I'd say that you tend to start your posts like you did start this topic. To be frank, I don't like it but as always it's your own choice.

    ++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++
    jesus Erkka, since when did you become so wise? :D

    And why arent you posting more regularly?
    Always been. ;) And I am posting regularly.
     

    Holygr4le

    Senior Member
    Aug 4, 2005
    2,539
    #27
    ++ [ originally posted by Erkka ] ++
    As for Giannichedda and Blasi, what do they lack? They're perfect subs. Once again I'll ask, what the hell more do you people want? Makelele and Cambiasso as subs? Oh no, they're too one-dimensional too... :yawn:
    Perfect subs if you have the lead, yes.
    We do not want much more, but a society that is content to the line of completeness stops evolving. And your right in that Both Makelele and Cambiasso are the same as Giannichedda and/or Blasi but better…

    Of course we cant have gamewinning creative midfielders on the bench that are worldclass. But we could have some creative alternative other then Oliviera on the bench. I count Mutu as an attacker.

    This is where you could have a very talented young player in your squad. Look at Barcelona with Messi as an great example.
     

    Bozi

    The Bozman
    Administrator
    Oct 18, 2005
    22,747
    #28
    ++ [ originally posted by Erkka ] ++

    Blasi is still young and in the latter stages of last season he failed simply because he couldn't yet play all the games for Juve. Early last season he was fantastic, I can't see any reason why he couldn't do the same now. Giannichedda is very similar to Tacchinardi, and to be honest I'd rather kept Tacchi on the summer because of his status and history with Juve. Well, Capello and Moggi decided otherwise and now Juve has another proven ball-winner as back-up. He's good enough, but not dazzling as you'd love to see. He's not very mediasexy but he does his job, time after time. I love his type of players, the furinos of the present time

    erkka is right these are the type of player that win you metches,you dont always notice them and they rarely do anything to make you jump out of your seat but they go about their job and do it effectively
     

    sateeh

    Day Walker
    Jul 28, 2003
    8,020
    #30
    well i have to say erkka is spot on in almost all counts..i have to agree.

    Talking about chelsea raising the bar, well they have.But we cant just be like chelsea.Unless we can get a millionere that will just pay for everything without thinking, i dont think we can have the same squad!Actually i dont a goddam multi-billionere taking over our club!

    Many ppl here just want the perfect squad, great players on the field and great players on the bench.We just can't have that, and actually i dont want that.I like the way juve handles their players, and the way we just know wat players we need, year after year.

    Many ppl here talked about how the solution for our problems is "pizzaro"... where is he now?Inter and he choked... this just shows that Moggi &co always make the best decisions when it comes to transfers, and this squad is just amazing.I expected players like chiellini,balzaretti to leave.But they kept them.I know that in regards for the CL we r not the best.But i think we can win it all, if the players keep the intesity, and if they have the drive to win it at the end.Which is wat i didnt see in the bayern game.. and i hope i will see that emotion later on.I think that is the thing that we have and nobody has that in them.

    The talk about Gianni is important.He is the sub for both our DM's, i think he is a step up from tacchi and appiah defensively.However appiah's offesive abilities are better, but his passing is just way under the juve faithful expect.
    For me unlike other members here i think that Manuele blasi is the better of the two, only becuz he played soo much with emo, and although his passing isnt as good, he knows how to run with the ball through the middle of the field.
     

    Erkka

    Senior Member
    Mar 31, 2004
    3,863
    #31
    ++ [ originally posted by Holygr4le ] ++

    Perfect subs if you have the lead, yes.
    What is this supposed to mean? Of course they're not even coming on the pitch even if we are leading, Vieira and Émerson are more than capable of doing defensive duties. They're not THAT different from Vieira and Émerson, though two latter guy do have more abilities with ball.

    ++ [ originally posted by Holygr4le ] ++
    We do not want much more, but a society that is content to the line of completeness stops evolving. And your right in that Both Makelele and Cambiasso are the same as Giannichedda and/or Blasi but better…

    Of course we cant have gamewinning creative midfielders on the bench that are worldclass. But we could have some creative alternative other then Oliviera on the bench. I count Mutu as an attacker.

    This is where you could have a very talented young player in your squad. Look at Barcelona with Messi as an great example.
    Creativity is definitely overrated. Juve's current squad doesn't offer that much creativity, but it still wins the game by sheer power, iron determination and most importantly effectiviness. In Juve all know their duties, Capello has done amazing job sharing roles to his players. I don't think that playmaker-types are needed and I don't even believe that they'd have space in Juve. We discussed about this earlier too, while Andy would have preferred Pizarro instead of Vieira, I took the opposite opinion.

    edit: Last year the team that didn't have any creativity or flair scored most goals in Serie A. Not too shabby.

    About Messi, he is a great exception and you know it too. He's someone who actually has developed during his time at big club's youth system.
     

    Holygr4le

    Senior Member
    Aug 4, 2005
    2,539
    #32
    ++ [ originally posted by Erkka ] ++
    What is this supposed to mean? Of course they're not even coming on the pitch even if we are leading, Vieira and Émerson are more than capable of doing defensive duties. They're not THAT different from Vieira and Émerson, though two latter guy do have more abilities with ball.
    I was not necessary talking about a substitution with Either Viera nor Emerson.

    ++ [ originally posted by Erkka ] ++
    Creativity is definitely overrated. Juve's current squad doesn't offer that much creativity, but it still wins the game by sheer power, iron determination and most importantly effectiviness. In Juve all know their duties, Capello has done amazing job sharing roles to his players. I don't think that playmaker-types are needed and I don't even believe that they'd have space in Juve. We discussed about this earlier too, while Andy would have preferred Pizarro instead of Vieira, I took the opposite opinion.
    Power and determination, yes. We lacked that in the last game.
    Effectiveness is our trademark and about creativity, just read below…

    ++ [ originally posted by Holygr4le ] ++
    I all depends on how you play it. Look at Ac Milan for example where Pirlo is supposed to be a playmaker. When the paste lowers he is worth nothing. Why? Because it is all about movement.

    Our problem is that we don’t involve enough players from behind in attacking. Yeah, I know, they have to work harder and cover greater ground.


    ++ [ originally posted by Erkka ] ++
    edit: Last year the team that didn't have any creativity or flair scored most goals in Serie A. Not too shabby.

    About Messi, he is a great exception and you know it too. He's someone who actually has developed during his time at big club's youth system.
    My point was that he is not in the starting 11 and a young super talent. As C.Ronaldo was before being bought to utd…


    EDIT: Christ.. I mean..., I do agree with what your saying just that I believe we can find improvement even though our results this far is superb. I do not seek in finding someone who should bare the houndhead when there is no head to bare...
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,142
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #33
    ++ [ originally posted by Erkka ] ++

    Then don't buy it, but honestly I don't believe in that argument at all. Yes, Capello have used the same players so far. So what, only 10 games have passed and the players' versatility hasn't gone anywhere. You know as well as I do that Zambrotta is an excellent midfielder too, not to mention Mutu. You even said it yourself in some match-topic. Real-life football isn't FM, you can't change the whole squad for every second game.
    Again you miss the point...what is versatility when a coach doesn't use it? If Vieira is out he will use Giannichedda no matter what...if Nedved is out he is seemingly more happy to field Chiellini...if Camoranesi is out he will switch Nedved to the right flank where he continues to fail...versatility is nothing when the coach doesnt use it. Same formation and tactics every match.


    As for Vieira's absence, why wouldn't Juve handle it because they won the title last year too without him? Now all Juve lacks is luck, when everyone is fit this team is unstoppable and has every chance to win every trophy available.
    I'm more concerned with the Champions League than the Scudetto race...thought I made that clear in my original post. Of course we won the Scudetto with Blasi, however our displays were not always so safe and sound.

    Luck? You sound like Capello...if we are waiting for luck we'll have to wait forever. What a silly attitude IMO.



    As for Giannichedda and Blasi, what do they lack?
    What do they lack? Are you kidding me Erkka...you should be able to figure that out yourself.




    Yes, of course it's obvious. But the record so far speaks for itself... And yes, I might be wrong here but I'd say that you tend to start your posts like you did start this topic. To be frank, I don't like it but as always it's your own choice.
    Come again?
     

    A_LAcki

    Senior Member
    Dec 23, 2002
    3,560
    #35
    ++ [ originally posted by Erkka ] ++
    oh FFS, don't always make yourself a righteous martyr Andy, you've also been wrong in many occasions just like the others. I have been very disappointed with you lately, specially when I saw "point" about Capello, Milan and Ajax in CL-final. :( Get yourself ass back to the quality posts!!

    But now back to business, I firmly believe that the bench offers much more width than last year. You didn't mention Kovac, who is more than capable back-up for Thuram or even Cannavaro on his good day. Last year we lacked everything on that department, Montero wasn't any good. As for midfield, VERSATILITY is the key. I can't believe that you are honestly claiming that Juve doesn't have back-ups for Nedved and Camoranesi. Mutu can easily handle the left wing and Zambrotta could replace Camoranesi on the right flank if necessary. As for Émerson and Vieira, one of them can be out without the quality of play suffering that much. As for Olivera, he isn't around because he is currently injured.

    Besides, WHAT THE HELL MORE DO YOU PEOPLE WANT? You just can't have world class players as subs everywhere!!
    :thumb: Great post and spot on! Andy, you really become kind of a drama queen, and I really think you are overreacting! On the other hand, listen to the finish. They are always right! Thats because of the Finnlandia Vodka! :D
     

    sateeh

    Day Walker
    Jul 28, 2003
    8,020
    #36
    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++
    Again you miss the point...what is versatility when a coach doesn't use it? If Vieira is out he will use Giannichedda no matter what...if Nedved is out he is seemingly more happy to field Chiellini...if Camoranesi is out he will switch Nedved to the right flank where he continues to fail...versatility is nothing when the coach doesnt use it. Same formation and tactics every match.

    I'm more concerned with the Champions League than the Scudetto race...thought I made that clear in my original post. Of course we won the Scudetto with Blasi, however our displays were not always so safe and sound.

    Luck? You sound like Capello...if we are waiting for luck we'll have to wait forever. What a silly attitude IMO.
    What do they lack? Are you kidding me Erkka...you should be able to figure that out yourself.
    Come again?
    1)For ur first point abt how he doesnt like to change the formation or the tactics, i dont think thats a good idea.Changing the tactics when u dont need to will hurt the team more than it will benefit it. If u want to change the players more often then ur calling for a rotation system, and i dont think that it is very good.Capello tried at the begining of the season and it didnt work.Rijkard is ttrying to use it in Barca, and look how r they playing...
    And why would he need to change the tactics, if he doesnt need to ?we won 9/10.Which in anyones opinion is very good.
    I agree with u abt neddy though, he needs to rethink his performances on the bench.

    2) for ur 2nd point, even if u have the best team in the world, with the best players, without luck they wont win the CL especially.Everyone saw how chelsea went out last season, and how liver won the CL.And how chelsea went actually through to meet liverpool!!You actually need a whole lot of luck.

    3)ur 3rd point was abt focusing on the CL.Ur not the only one who wants the CL to finally come here.
    But also u said the team's display weren't always safe and convincing...well if u want to see great displays and winning as well, am sorry to say this but u should start watching Chelsea or Real Madrid(i know ur a true juve fan though)

    4) abt gianni and blasi..i know they r not the best.But we can't get the best.I guess capello wanted C.Zanetti, but we couldn't get him.I guess he is better than both of them.And also remember we cant always get the best.

    forzaa juvee
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,142
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #37
    ++ [ originally posted by A_LAcki ] ++


    :thumb: Great post and spot on! Andy, you really become kind of a drama queen, and I really think you are overreacting! On the other hand, listen to the finish. They are always right! Thats because of the Finnlandia Vodka! :D
    I do not know how you can be happy with Giannichedda and Blasi as our only true options to use in midfield off the bench. We have no proper replacement for Camoranesi and no player to bring on to provide a spark in midfield except for Mutu who Capello does not want to use anyway. But hey if it makes you sleep better at night so be it...I just see it a different way.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,142
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #38
    ++ [ originally posted by sateeh ] ++


    1)For ur first point abt how he doesnt like to change the formation or the tactics, i dont think thats a good idea.Changing the tactics when u dont need to will hurt the team more than it will benefit it.
    It's not all about changing tactics every match as you also have to change your approach to fit the respective match. Does Mourinho set his side out to play every match the same way? Of course not. Just look at what he advised his team to do last season in the Champions League...defend against Barca at Camp Nou then come back to the Bridge attacking furiously against Barca's advanced backline, not just saying "let's take our time" like Capello during the Liverpool second leg. Then Mourinho switched tactics up for matches against Bayern and was successful.

    You cannot win the Champions League playing the same way every single match...fielding the same team and using the same tactical mentality. You just can't. It works in the Scudetto race but not in Europe when you have great teams who all play different ways and compete in a two-legged knockout system. Playing every match like it's the same is foolishness IMO.

    2) for ur 2nd point, even if u have the best team in the world, with the best players, without luck they wont win the CL especially.Everyone saw how chelsea went out last season, and how liver won the CL.And how chelsea went actually through to meet liverpool!!You actually need a whole lot of luck.
    Of course you need some "luck," however sitting around waiting for it is foolishness beyond words...the best teams in this world have luck on their side because they deserve it most of the time. Relying on luck to win us the Champions League will not get us anywhere.

    But also u said the team's display weren't always safe and convincing...well if u want to see great displays and winning as well, am sorry to say this but u should start watching Chelsea or Real Madrid(i know ur a true juve fan though)
    Now, why does this matter? :rolleyes:

    As a supporter of this club I think I'm entitled to state my opinion on how things should be run...I do not know how one can differentiate who is a real supporter just by looking at their views on tactics...doesnt make much sense.
     

    sateeh

    Day Walker
    Jul 28, 2003
    8,020
    #39
    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++


    It's not all about changing tactics every match as you also have to change your approach to fit the respective match. Does Mourinho set his side out to play every match the same way? Of course not. Just look at what he advised his team to do last season in the Champions League...defend against Barca at Camp Nou then come back to the Bridge attacking furiously against Barca's advanced backline, not just saying "let's take our time" like Capello during the Liverpool second leg. Then Mourinho switched tactics up for matches against Bayern and was successful.

    You cannot win the Champions League playing the same way every single match...fielding the same team and using the same tactical mentality. You just can't. It works in the Scudetto race but not in Europe when you have great teams who all play different ways and compete in a two-legged knockout system. Playing every match like it's the same is foolishness IMO.
    i agree in some way abt the importance of changing the approach to every game in the CL.But sometimes u just have to impose ur approach to the game on the other game,and force them to change their game plan.Show them that their plan isnt working.
    For me i dont like Mourinho and i dont think he is a great coach "Tacitally" speaking.He defended in the Nou camp cuz he didnt get a chance from barca.His "great" team got their asses kicked, and rijkardd just made his tactics look like they were made by a 11 yr old.
    In the 2nd leg, he didnt have any chance but to attack, and after all they've done.They didnt even deserve to get through,cuz that goal scored was just obvious that Valdez was held by terry and it was a foul.
    Everyone is talking abt the liverpool games, and i tell that it was 85% capello's fault, cuz he just had the wrong approach to the game.Especially in the first game when he tried to play the "english" game( the fast, long balls), so we just could'nt cope with the scousers and lost.In the 2nd leg it was again partially capello's fault but i blame the players aswell, they showed nothing.Its like they just surrendered.



    Of course you need some "luck," however sitting around waiting for it is foolishness beyond words...the best teams in this world have luck on their side because they deserve it most of the time. Relying on luck to win us the Champions League will not get us anywhere.
    well did liverpool deserve the luck they had last year?i dont think so at least.For gods sake their not even supposed to be at the CL this year.Did milan deserve the luck they got ?i dont think so.


    abt ur opinion, ofcourse ur entitled to an opinion, am just saying that i didnt love & support juve becuz they play attractive football.Sometimes they do.its just that most of the time, juve players play with their hearts and their sole goals are to live up to the high expectations and standards this great club has.This club plays effective football.And players just want to honor the shirt's their wearing.
     

    Snoop

    Sabet is a nasty virgin
    Oct 2, 2001
    28,186
    #40
    ++ [ originally posted by AtotheB ] ++
    Nice to see all the Capello "Yes-Men" come out of the woodwork....yaaaay.
    here we go,you call names again.it's always like that,when someone don't agree with you,you always do that..
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)