Ballon d'Or (4 Viewers)

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
31,856
consider this. most attackers benefited from bad referring and offsides and handballs in past, specifically 90s, 80s,70s and before. even bribery was very common.

nowadays even before VAR, ref standard is muchhigher. it is harder to get away with offsides and handballs. before in the 90s and before era it was pretty much common to see tons of offside, or foul, or handballs in games resulting in goals. so no those attackers aren't better at all
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
31,856
buddy maradona is celebrated despite him winning a world cup using his hand. this isnt' acceptable in today's higher standards.

also players like maradona, baggio, puskas, platini would never survive today's professional requirements and drug testing. these guys would get crucified by professional training standards, VAR not letting them dive, and social media exposing their every action on and off field
 

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,640
I think an easy argument to demonstrate nostalgia glasses is to ask yourselves - do you rate the active players with 100+ Serie A goals? Do you appreciate Quagliarella, Immobile, Ibra, Higuaín, Mertens, Pandev, Zapata? Or are they chumps compared to the champions of the past who scored a similar amount in a similar amount of games?
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
39,326
Yes, the current generation of Twitter Fags, Social Media Whores and Fortnite Gamers is definitely up there with the Maradonas, Baggios, Platinins, Batistutas, Nestas and Cruyffs of the world.

Italian football in the late 80s to the late 90s and even early 00s was the best football I have ever witnessed. The league was flooded with talent. I don't need stats to tell me who's better. It's like the Lebron vs Jordan argument. Longevity is only one factor. Numbers can indicate how incredibly consistent a performer is, but I believe my eyes and what I see.

No one will ever convince me that Messi or Ronaldo, the two preeminent performers of the past 15 years, are better than the original Ronaldo, more electrifying than Ronaldinho, or more mesmerizing than Baggio. Zidane may not have scored as many goals, but he left an indelible mark on the game, something only 2-3 players in this entire generation might be capable of.
 

Lapa

FLY, EAGLES FLY
Sep 29, 2008
19,954
Yes, the current generation of Twitter Fags, Social Media Whores and Fortnite Gamers is definitely up there with the Maradonas, Baggios, Platinins, Batistutas, Nestas and Cruyffs of the world.

Italian football in the late 80s to the late 90s and even early 00s was the best football I have ever witnessed. The league was flooded with talent. I don't need stats to tell me who's better. It's like the Lebron vs Jordan argument. Longevity is only one factor. Numbers can indicate how incredibly consistent a performer is, but I believe my eyes and what I see.

No one will ever convince me that Messi or Ronaldo, the two preeminent performers of the past 15 years, are better than the original Ronaldo, more electrifying than Ronaldinho, or more mesmerizing than Baggio. Zidane may not have scored as many goals, but he left an indelible mark on the game, something only 2-3 players in this entire generation might be capable of.
I love you, I truly do, but fuck that Algerian manwhore!
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
72,472
I think an easy argument to demonstrate nostalgia glasses is to ask yourselves - do you rate the active players with 100+ Serie A goals? Do you appreciate Quagliarella, Immobile, Ibra, Higuaín, Mertens, Pandev, Zapata? Or are they chumps compared to the champions of the past who scored a similar amount in a similar amount of games?
They play in a far weaker and more attacking Serie A.
 

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,640
They play in a far weaker and more attacking Serie A.
https://www.worldfootball.net/stats/ita-serie-a/1/ - not sure I'd agree that Serie A was noticeably less attacking in the past, the goals per game stats look similar throughout different seasons.

as for far weaker - as in less WC players play in Serie A nowadays compared to throughout it's history? with the same argument you could say that someone like Harry Kane or Romelu Lukaku are better that f.e. Thierry Henry, as they play in the financially strongest league in Europe and score at a similar rate Henry did who played at a far less star studded and financially capable EPL. and actually I don't think they're better, I think they're pretty similar and I'd even give a slight edge to Henry for the actual trophies won, regardless of whether PL is number 1 or number 3 on the continent at the time.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
72,472
https://www.worldfootball.net/stats/ita-serie-a/1/ - not sure I'd agree that Serie A was noticeably less attacking in the past, the goals per game stats look similar throughout different seasons.

as for far weaker - as in less WC players play in Serie A nowadays compared to throughout it's history? with the same argument you could say that someone like Harry Kane or Romelu Lukaku are better that f.e. Thierry Henry, as they play in the financially strongest league in Europe and score at a similar rate Henry did who played at a far less star studded and financially capable EPL. and actually I don't think they're better, I think they're pretty similar and I'd even give a slight edge to Henry for the actual trophies won, regardless of whether PL is number 1 or number 3 on the continent at the time.
Stats only tell part of the story. And the stats you provided show that the 70s and 80s in particular were considerably more conservative. There were two points for a win until 1994, so it's not surprising. Besides, this is not just my opinion or having a look at stats, this is the consensus from Italian football history. But feel free to disagree.

There were 3 goals per game last season lol. Creeping into the 90s and then 00s more and more goals were scored, despite the quality of players at both ends decreasing since 2006.

The Premier League has so much money I don't really understand the comparison, Henry is just one player, the league was not full of them. If anything I'd say the standard of defending in the Premier League was worse then that it is now. Actually I'd say peak defending in the PL was around 2005-1015. I've watched English football close hand since the early 90s and up until coaches like Mourinho came in and shifted the tactical mindset the teams were just about scoring as many goals as possible. Some of the defending in 90s English football was absolutely amateurish, but it gradually improved once teams set themselves up better and the standard of players they could buy increased. Now it's generally fallen by the wayside with zonal marking, most defenders defend the same way and pretend to be midfielders, but the better ones mostly end up in the Premier League because that's where the money is.
 

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,640
Stats only tell part of the story. And the stats you provided show that the 70s and 80s in particular were considerably more conservative. There were two points for a win until 1994, so it's not surprising. Besides, this is not just my opinion or having a look at stats, this is the consensus from Italian football history. But feel free to disagree.

There were 3 goals per game last season lol. Creeping into the 90s and then 00s more and more goals were scored, despite the quality of players at both ends decreasing since 2006.

The Premier League has so much money I don't really understand the comparison, Henry is just one player, the league was not full of them. If anything I'd say the standard of defending in the Premier League was worse then that it is now. Actually I'd say peak defending in the PL was around 2005-1015. I've watched English football close hand since the early 90s and up until coaches like Mourinho came in and shifted the tactical mindset the teams were just about scoring as many goals as possible. Some of the defending in 90s English football was absolutely amateurish, but it gradually improved once teams set themselves up better and the standard of players they could buy increased. Now it's generally fallen by the wayside with zonal marking, most defenders defend the same way and pretend to be midfielders, but the better ones mostly end up in the Premier League because that's where the money is.
I put it in a lazy graph. so the 60ties-80ties indeed were more defensive, but I dont see much of a difference between the 90ties, 2000s and 2010s. the past 2 seasons have been noticeable though, but I wonder how much it has to do with penalties increasing.

1635862065753.png
 

Attachments

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
72,472
Damn, didn't even know that Luis Suarez was still alive!

The Ballon d'Or looked a bit different in those days.

DxjbUPnXcAELqXU.jpg


Our own Omar Sivori with it the year after:

426551301_20f4b81555.jpg


Close up of George Best's:

E1323-1-960x1024.jpg
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)