Ballack to replace nedved in the future? (2 Viewers)

Mr. Gol

Senior Member
Sep 15, 2004
3,472
#83
The problem with Ballack is that he can't dribble, and he's not creative as well. He compensates for that by scoring a lot and helping out the defense. Signing Ballack would mean our already static midfield would lose even more creativity.
 

Mr. Gol

Senior Member
Sep 15, 2004
3,472
#85
Why do we need Mancini, we already have Camoranesi?

We don't buy Esposito because we already have Trez, Mutu, DP and Ibrahimovic.

There is a differenmce between having good squad depth and having three quality but overpaid backups for every position.
 

Juve-Nuts

Junior Member
May 31, 2005
118
#86
incase u dont know esposito can be used as a left or right midfielder, hes hardly a striker, we need mancini because we need cover for zebina and camoranesi unless u feel olivera is adaquade back up??? i dont think so...
Mancini im sure can also play on the left, maybe not his favoured position but it gives us options. And since when is bit of versatility a bad thing? u obviously have overlooked the lack of wide players we have avaliable to us at the moment. Can you name me 3 back ups we have for the flanks? Zambrotta dosent count as he is a left back, fire away mate, now u will see why we need Mancini and why i think we should bid for Esposito
 

Desmond

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2002
8,938
#89
Del Piero and Mutu are options for midfield, and Olivera hasn't done too badly either so I don't see why he couldn't fill in for Camoranesi once in a while.

Mancini on the bench would be a little too much.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)