Bahrain 2011 Demonstrations (2 Viewers)

K.O.

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2005
13,883
#81
1- You know that rubber bullet when being shot directly like that kills. No?

Armed demonstrators? Did you see him carrying anything? Enlighten us please. We are talking about the video. Don't bring me fair tales from your friends there please.

2- The GCC forces went there to hunt birds not people, I'm sure.

3- :D: Do you want me to prove for you that the demonstrators are not armed? Why don't you prove to us that they are armed? I think the normal case for a person is walking unarmed unless you know other types of creatures.
Your replies show that you don't read. I already posted videos in previous pages showing armed 'protesters' with Swords, knives and Molotov cocktails. whether it's shown on Bahrain State TV or not, still, it's a CLEAR video.

For the GCC forces, read more about the 'Peninsula Shield' and their duties. I posted an interview with Mr. Abdulaziz Sager explaining that. Again, READ.

I don't even understand the bolded part. Excuse me?

And who said these are terrorists? The terrorist Bahraini government? Yeah right.
Whoever does one of these acts is a terrorist.

1- Disrupting Education in nationwide schools.
2- Combating Policemen and Soldiers.
3- Barricading the major highways and flyovers in the country.
4- Damaging and harming the University of Bahrain and attacking students in classes.
5- Controlling major Hospitals, refusing to allow treatment of non-Shiites!
6- Spreading psychological disorder to the people.
7- Attacking neighborhoods, terrorizing its people.
8- Attacking foreign workers (1 casualty and 16 injured).
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
OP

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #84
    The footage that reveals the brutal truth about Bahrain's crackdown

    The unarmed, middle-aged man in the video seems to pose no threat to the Bahraini security forces. He gesticulates at a group of soldiers or policemen, dressed in blue jumpsuits and white helmets, just a few feet away.

    One of them gestures as if to wave away a nearby protester filming the incident. Then the civilian is shot.

    He sinks to his knees. He stands. He is shot again. And this time he does not get up.

    The footage of the incident leaves many questions unanswered. There is no evidence of when it was filmed, or of whether the man was shot with rubber bullets, tear gas or live bullets. The victim's name is unknown. And there is no word whether he lived or died.

    But as it spread around the world online yesterday, at the same time as the government arrested seven top opposition leaders and kept injured protesters away from the country's main hospital, it seemed to emblematise the lengths to which the authorities were prepared to go to maintain their grip on power. In another short clip posted on YouTube, another civilian takes his shirt off and waves his arms to show he is unarmed. He, too, is shot. As blood pours from his leg he is taken away in a car in search of treatment, but according to the user who uploaded the video, he is denied access to the hospital. Another video shows him being treated in an ordinary home.

    Such ruthlessness appeared to be an indication of the strength of the authorities' rejection of reform. It shows that the ruling Sunni Muslim al-Khalifa family has decided to fight to the finish against Bahrain's Shia majority.

    There were few cars on the streets of the capital Manama yesterday, even before the start of the curfew. Soldiers, backed by tanks, established checkpoints on the main roads, while side streets were blocked by skips and shopping trolleys. Shops were mostly closed and there were long lines outside those that were open. A man who had the red and white Bahraini flag – adopted by demonstrators as their banner – in his car was arrested by police wearing black ski masks.

    The opposition accuses the Sunni-dominated government of stoking sectarian hatred by portraying the month-long protests as a movement solely of Shia. "Our aim and goal is democracy," said opposition activist Mohammed al-Maskati in a telephone interview.

    "The slogan of the protesters has been to say: 'there are no Shia and there are no Sunni'. Several of those arrested this morning are Sunni."

    He complained that the pro-government media is falsely claiming that Shia clerical leaders were behind the mass demonstrations over the last month.

    King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa and the royal family have acted violently against the protests ever since they started in imitation of what had happened in Tunisia and Egypt. The US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates visiting Bahrain last week-end to counsel moderation said there had been only "baby steps" towards reform.

    Mr Maskati said that the military had taken over the main Salmaniya hospital and anybody going there was being interrogated. "In one case friends were not allowed to take away the body of one of the protesters who had been killed." The Salmaniya hospital had been a focus for demonstrators last month.

    The takeover of medical facilities by the security services was confirmed by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay. She said that "there are reports of arbitrary arrests, killings, beatings of protesters and of medical personnel and the takeover of hospitals and medical centres by various security forces. This is shocking and illegal conduct".

    Mr Maskati says there could be little resistance because of the strength of the forces deployed by the state. He said some people were going into the streets to beat drums in a symbolic breach of curfew, but police "come within 10 minutes" and open fire. In some cases he said the security forces were using .50 calibre machine guns.

    He did not think there would be demonstrations after Friday prayers because of the heavy security presence and the opposition parties had not called for street protests because police and army would open fire. With their leaders under arrest and charged with "incitement to kill" and being in communication with foreign powers, Mr Maskati said opposition had no definite plan for future action.

    The Bahraini government has armed forces numbering some 30,000 – all of whom are Sunni – and police and security services with about the same size, many of them being Baluchi, Yemeni or Syrian.

    A central demand of the two thirds of Bahrainis who are Shia is that there should be an end to job discrimination against them. It is not known how the al-Khalifa royal family reached the decision to rely wholly on force to keep their grip on absolute power, though they have clearly been encouraged to do so by Saudi Arabia.

    The most powerful opponent of reform is the uncle of the king and prime minister for the last 40 years, Khalifa bin Salman al-Khalifa, who is said to be the richest man in Bahrain. His departure was a key demand of the opposition.

    Not a single person was flown out on the first of two planes chartered by the British government to evacuate Britons from Bahrain. Those who wanted to get out found seats on commercial flights. A second flight lands today.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...l-truth-about-bahrains-crackdown-2245364.html
     

    sateeh

    Day Walker
    Jul 28, 2003
    8,019
    #86
    I'm not going to talk much about the issue at hand here. Regarding the protesters being armed or not. There is no one video posted by an international media agency showing a protester using a weapon. We only see videos with the police/army using their various weapons on protesters with no humanity whatsoever. The amount of casualties is over 12 at the moment as confirmed by human rights groups and various international resources and NOT the al-wefaq or other untrusted sources as Bahrain. Some of the deaths are pretty gruesome and show the cruelty of the government.Local sources do not show these numbers or even the amount that were injured since the beginning of the week, due to people being attacked in their homes.

    About the hospital, the only reports regarding people being denied access due to certain sects or whatnot along with the "chaos" are from the local media. Nothing from the international doctors organizations or the UN. Now the hospital is under the rule of the army, who are denying various people their rights to get treated(As confirmed by various international sources including a Kuwaiti lady who wanted treatment for her ill son), are threatening beating doctors and nurses(according to Amnesty International and World Doctors Associations and confirmed by the News Sources).
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #87
    I'm not going to talk much about the issue at hand here. Regarding the protesters being armed or not. There is no one video posted by an international media agency showing a protester using a weapon. We only see videos with the police/army using their various weapons on protesters with no humanity whatsoever. The amount of casualties is over 12 at the moment as confirmed by human rights groups and various international resources and NOT the al-wefaq or other untrusted sources as Bahrain. Some of the deaths are pretty gruesome and show the cruelty of the government.Local sources do not show these numbers or even the amount that were injured since the beginning of the week, due to people being attacked in their homes.

    About the hospital, the only reports regarding people being denied access due to certain sects or whatnot along with the "chaos" are from the local media. Nothing from the international doctors organizations or the UN. Now the hospital is under the rule of the army, who are denying various people their rights to get treated(As confirmed by various international sources including a Kuwaiti lady who wanted treatment for her ill son), are threatening beating doctors and nurses(according to Amnesty International and World Doctors Associations and confirmed by the News Sources).
    Can't you make regular posts in this thread?

    Seeing posts from Bahrainis give us much more credible info here :tup:
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #88
    The government ordered the destruction of the statue within Pearl Square that had been a symbol of protests in the Gulf state. Foreign minister Sheikh Khaled bin Ahmed al-Khalifa said the army destroyed the monument because "it was a bad memory."

    The Arab dictators can not get enough idiocy really. Is this the solution for the problem?
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #89
    The government ordered the destruction of the statue within Pearl Square that had been a symbol of protests in the Gulf state. Foreign minister Sheikh Khaled bin Ahmed al-Khalifa said the army destroyed the monument because "it was a bad memory."

    The Arab dictators can not get enough idiocy really. Is this the solution for the problem?
    This is a video for damaging the monument


    Some news say that the pillars of the monument fell down on one of the vehicles and killed everybody inside it. Great planning indeed.
     

    Zé Tahir

    JhoolayLaaaal!
    Moderator
    Dec 10, 2004
    29,280
    #91
    I didn't believe it when I first heard they destroyed the monument but it's real :lol2: They're so fucking clueless...they have no answer to this situation. They've tried rubber bullets, real bullets, brought in foreign troops..nothing is working....

    -Shit, what should we do, we need to stop these demonstrations!
    -Oh I've got an idea, lets demolish the monument, that'll do it!
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #93
    The Saudi intervention in Bahrain will fuel sectarianism, not stifle it


    In Bahrain as elsewhere the uprising began in a spirit of hopeful nationalism. But now religious divides are being exploited.

    A man in jeans and a jumper is standing in the road, waving his arms in brave defiance as bullets crackle around him. A few seconds later, he crumples and is loaded, bleeding, into a car to be taken to hospital. It's a few minutes of footage from the streets of Manama in Bahrain and the kind of incident that has become familiar in the last few months of Arab uprisings. But pause a moment, because this image of extraordinary, reckless bravery can become iconic in different ways to its many web audiences. Do we understand all of them?

    Westerners see a political activist; some Sunni Muslims see a Shia troublemaker; and Shias across the Muslim world see a martyr. There is no more powerful a mobilising idea in Shia Islam than the martyr. For nearly one and a half thousand years, Shias have revered Ali, the prophet's son-in-law, who was assassinated, and the prophet's grandson, Hussein, who was killed in battle at Karbala; betrayal has become a passionate narrative of identity.

    What has filled western observers with optimism is that the spirit of the Arab protesters in recent months has been so unequivocally non-sectarian. Egyptian Muslims and Christians side by side on the streets, Bahraini Shias and Sunnis insisting they were Bahrainis first and foremost, jointly demanding political reform. But as the revolutions grow older, the highly fluid politics shifts, secular national identities can fragment and religious identities gather force; can the latter be contained? Everyone is haunted by Iraq; after the fall of Saddam, Iraqis celebrated "as Iraqis and as Muslims", but what ensued was the deadliest sectarian conflict the region has ever seen. How does peaceful nationalism fail to hold its ground?

    The question is emerging in Egypt, the country at the centre of the Arab spring. The recent burning of a church and the rough handling of a demonstration of Coptic Christians in Cairo has set nerves on edge. Christians are anxious about newly confident Islamist groups; their leaders urged them to vote no to constitutional amendments in the referendum at the weekend, while Islamist leaders were urging a yes vote.

    But it is, above all, in Bahrain that a popular political reform movement is increasingly being framed in sectarian terms, and as a result takes on entirely different dimensions with repercussions across the region. Bahrain's significance is out of all proportion to its tiny size. An island at the centre of western oil dependency and US military capability – as home of the US Fifth Fleet – Bahrain is bang on the faultline of Islam's deepest and most embittered of divisions between Sunnis and Shias. It is a division that the west has often failed to understand, and it has frequently miscalculated how it is being used and for what purposes – as was very evident in the Iraq war. Could it be doing so again?

    A majority of the Bahrain population is Shia and they are governed by a Sunni monarchy with a long history of discrimination. There are very few Shias in the army and police, they suffer disproportionate unemployment and lack access to housing. For years there has been periodic unrest. In recent weeks, as the violent repression by the Sunni monarchy in Bahrain has intensified, the Shias have been radicalised, moving beyond the demand for constitutional reform to one of regime change, and that has cost them their Sunni allies. But the factor that has transformed a delicate situation into an explosive one was the intervention of the Saudi and Gulf Co-operation Council's troops last week in support of the Bahraini king.

    The Saudis are using the threat of sectarianism as cover, insisting that urgent action was necessary to prevent what they are, in fact, fuelling. Senior figures in Saudi justified their action in Bahrain as necessary to prevent Shia fitna (chaos), points out the Middle East analyst Mai Yanami. Provoking the fear of Shias meets domestic requirements; it inhibits the cautious Saudi version of the Arab spring – a nervous internet petition movement asking for reforms had been gathering strength.

    With violent unrest in Yemen on its southern border and in Bahrain, Saudi government figures are edgy, pouring money into food subsidies and pay rises; they warn that democracy risks "60 years of bloodshed". It's an old trick for repressive regimes to exploit fear that change could unleash unmanageable forces, but for a region that has just witnessed the sectarian violence of Iraq, it doesn't sound like an empty threat.

    Highlighting sectarianism serves Saudi well with another constituency – its American allies. There have been plenty of thinly veiled references to Iranian links with their co-religionists in Bahrain; presumably, allegations of "foreign interference" in Bahrain have been poured into American ears to keep them on side. Saudi's treatment of its own nearly 2 million Shia minority is infamous. Children are taught that Shias are apostates; to some Wahhabi clerics, Shias are worse than infidels.

    Religious identities have always crossed the arbitrary, colonial-imposed borders in the Arab world – ideas and people have followed the Shia pilgrimage routes to sites such as Mashhad near the Iranian-Afghan border, and to Najaf and Karbala in Iraq – building strong links and family networks. The Gulf is what Toby Mathiesen, of the School of Oriental and African Studies, calls a transnational space. The internet reinforces this; just as it helped spread the Arab political uprisings, so it can reinforce religious identities. In the last few days there have been demonstrations against Saudi intervention in Bahrain in Shia communities in Iraq, Lebanon, Iran and the crucial Saudi eastern province of Qatif, where most of its Shia live – and where Saudi oil is also concentrated.

    For the US, this amounts to a massive headache that makes even Libya look straightforward. Its invasion of Iraq in 2003 inadvertently boosted the reach and influence of Shia Iran in the region; for the first time in centuries the Shias have gained power and there has been much talk of a Shia revival, points out Rosemary Hollis, professor of Middle Eastern studies at City University. This has made Sunnis throughout the Middle East increasingly anxious. Instability in the Gulf risks higher oil prices, and that risks global recession. But the repressive response can only work in the short term, while it makes nonsense of America's narrative of human rights and democracy. Increasingly, the danger is that America – and thus Britain – are on the wrong side, alongside regimes that can no longer secure their interests, and whose brutality blows apart western claims to the moral high ground.

    One final point. Britain's intimate relations with the Bahrain royal family now look embarrassing. The island was one of the last outposts of the empire, and close relations have been sustained through military co-operation, commercial links and royal visits. Britain exports weapons and military advisers and imports Bahraini offspring to Sandhurst. The king of Bahrain was on the invitation list for Prince William's wedding and rapid diplomatic manoeuvrings are being deployed to avoid the event being hijacked by pro-democracy demonstrations; reportedly the king has now declined. That still leaves the issue of the Saudi king turning up at Westminster Abbey. Every wedding has its share of necessary but unwelcome guests, but the presence of Middle Eastern despots risks exposing the seediness of British foreign policy.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/20/bahrain-saudi-intervention-religious-divide
     

    K.O.

    Senior Member
    Nov 24, 2005
    13,883
    #95
    :lol: Press TV, gotta love Iranians bullshit.

    Did they show their passports when they were destroying mosques and burning korans? Cause in the video I didn't see any troops, let alone, 'Saudi' troops.
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #96
    Amid unrest, Bahrain companies fire hundreds of Shiites

    At least 16 Bahraini companies or government ministries have fired hundreds of mostly Shiite workers during the past week. Employees speak of being dismissed despite being on pre-approved leave or having received approval to stay home due to the unrest.

    Hundreds of mostly Shiite employees have been fired from Bahraini companies over the last week for participating in a strike, in what appears to be retribution for the protest movement that has shaken this tiny US ally in the Persian Gulf.

    The fired workers join students who have lost government scholarships to study abroad, medical workers who have been targeted, and hundreds of people who have been detained as the government tries to suppress a movement that threatens its power.

    The dismissals, officially for absenteeism, send a strong message to Bahrainis that dissent will be punished. They also appear to further a systematic targeting of the Shiite majority by the Sunni government, in a pattern that is daily driving deeper wedges between the two sects and making reconciliation even more difficult in an already polarized society.

    “Day by day, sector by sector, we’re being punished. Just watch Bahrain TV to find out who’s next,” says Hussein, an IT specialist who just lost his job at Aluminum Bahrain, referencing the nightly broadcasts on state TV that viciously attack the opposition.

    At least 16 companies or government ministries have fired more than 565 employees in recent weeks, most citing absenteeism, according to a count by the Bahrain Youth Society for Human Rights. By law, employers can terminate workers when they have an unexcused absence of 10 consecutive or 20 nonconsecutive days. Some companies in Bahrain struggled to manage when labor unions called a general strike on March 13, after government forces cracked down violently on protesters who had blocked a major highway, preventing motorists from getting to work.

    But at least some of the companies that fired workers did not follow the proper legal procedures for firing absentee employees, according to Essa Ebrahim Mohamed, a lawyer who advises the General Federation of Bahrain Trade Unions. And nearly a dozen workers at four companies said in interviews that they had not actually been absent for more than 10 days, or that they had been on leave approved by the company.

    Some say their managers encouraged workers to stay at home if they did not feel safe traveling to work, as armed gangs took over neighborhoods and roads were shut down with checkpoints.

    The decision to terminate the employees seems to have occurred suddenly, after most absent employees had returned and worked normally for a week.

    “This is a political decision, not managerial or employment-related at all,” says Sayed Hadi Al Mosawi, a chairman of the trade union at the telecommunications company Batelco and a member of the Shiite political opposition bloc Al Wefaq. “It's symbolic punishment to scare others.”

    The head of the UN's International Labor Office, Juan Somavia, sent a letter to Bahrain’s prime minister urging him to take action to ensure that workers do not face “unfair, unjust and degrading treatment for having expressed their legitimate rights in accordance with the principles of freedom of association,” he said in a statement.

    Fears for their safety kept workers home

    Though many workers obeyed the call to strike, many others said they stayed home simply out of fear for their safety during the week-and-a-half in question starting March 13. Workers who live in Shiite villages say the roads out of their villages were closed by threatening armed civilians. Even when they were replaced by police checkpoints, people feared the real danger of being arrested or disappearing at such checkpoints.

    “How could I go to work?” asks another Aluminum Bahrain, or Alba, employee, who is also named Hussein. He was among 150 employees who were fired beginning Friday, and the company’s union head says that will increase to 270. He lives in a Shiite village where weekly violence has occurred. “Ask anybody – at that time you might go and never come back.”

    He said he received e-mails and phone calls from his manager urging him to stay at home if he felt unsafe, and was in contact with his supervisor daily. Multiple Alba employees interviewed separately tell similar stories, and they raise other issues as well. The company normally uses electronic leave requests, which are difficult to erase from the system once they’re filed, says Hussein, who has knowledge of the system because of his position. But during the strike, the company stopped using electronic forms, and instead switched to paper, he says.

    Employees also say the buses that Alba normally sent to transport employees to work suspended their normal routes after one was stopped in Hamadtown and the employees were pulled out and beaten. Workers ask how they were supposed to get to their jobs when even the company bus couldn’t operate normally.

    Hussein, the IT specialist, said he stopped going to work because of the strike, but could not have gone even had he wanted to since the roads in and out of his village were closed with checkpoints. He returned to work after nine days, he says, fewer than the 10 required to fire him. Like other employees, he says the situation was normal at the company for more than a week after he returned, and no one mentioned the issue of absenteeism.

    Gates closed, IDs taken

    They were surprised, then, to arrive at work on April 3 and find all gates to the plant but one closed. At that gate, employees were required to swipe their ID cards. All those whose cards didn’t register were grouped to one side. Then security guards took their badges and handed them letters, dated March 31, that informed the workers they had been fired, with one month’s severance. The letters did not give a reason.

    When he called his manager to ask why, his manager couldn’t tell him, only saying it was “from the top,” says Hussein.

    When contacted for comment, Alba released a written statement from last week saying that 85 percent of its employees attended work during the strike period, but that “employees who have infringed the Kingdom of Bahrain’s Labor Law as well as Alba’s HR policies by not reporting, or committing other offenses against the company, will have to face disciplinary actions accordingly.”

    When the Monitor tried to meet with a group of fired Alba workers Tuesday, a man wearing civilian clothes was waiting at the meeting place. He told all the workers to leave, and threatened to arrest anyone who didn’t.

    No law that compels companies to rehire

    Many of the fired workers believe they will get their jobs back. But Mr. Mohamed, the lawyer, says it may not be that simple. Even if they were fired illegally, he says, the law does not compel companies to rehire the employees, although they can file suits for compensation.

    He says companies did not follow proper procedure of notifying absent employees after five days that they risk being fired if they do not return to work. Only one of the fired workers interviewed by the Monitor received such a letter, but only after he had already returned to work.

    "The law says a company can fire an employee for absence for 10 days without reason, without cause,” Mr. Mohamed argues. “But the question is, is the absence without cause or not? That is what is challenged.”

    Mohamed says employees cannot be considered absent under that law for going on strike, which is their right. He also argues the fraught security situation could be considered a cause for absence.

    One worker told he was fired for protesting

    An employee at Gulf Air, which fired at least 17 workers, said his dismissal was technically legal. He had been absent for five days last year after a car accident that fractured both his feet. The employee, who lives in Shiite village of Sitra, stayed home for five days after March 16, when at least 200 people were wounded as security forces and armed gangs attacked people there. He asked Gulf Air to give grant him some of the vacation days he was eligible to take, but the company refused.

    And while companies appear to be trying to justify most firings by the absenteeism, Bahrain Islamic Bank employee Mohamed Al Hamad said his dismissal had nothing to do with being absent. His manager told him explicitly that he had been fired for participating in the protests at Pearl Roundabout, he says. His name, personal ID number, bank cellphone number, and position were posted in a threatening message on Twitter. He has had two promotions in his four years at the bank, and was recommended for another in February.

    When 'pre-approved leave' becomes 'unexplained absence'

    At Bahrain Telecommunications Company, or Batelco, meanwhile, employees say many of those fired were on pre-approved leave during or before the crisis, and they say the company has now called the leaves unexplained absences. Batelco has fired at least 85 employees, according to a company spokesman's statement to the newspaper Al Wasat. Bahrain's government holds a majority stake of shares in Batelco, like Alba and many of the other companies that fired workers. Batelco did not return calls requesting comment.

    Abu Ali, a former Batelco employee and father of five, said he had been on vacation when the strike began. He called his manager and asked to extend his leave because of the security situation, and the manager agreed, he says.

    He described masked civilians manning a checkpoint near his home and interrogating him about why he was driving into his own neighborhood that week. “I had to take them to my home to make them believe that I lived there,” he says. “Then I was afraid for my family. They knew where I lived. I stayed at home and didn’t even send my kids to school.”

    He stayed away from work for a week. When he returned, everything was normal for a week, he says, until an abrupt meeting, similar to the one at Alba, when he learned he was fired.

    “We didn't do anything wrong,” he says. “Our mistake was that we were on leave, and that we are Shia. Even some Sunnis didn't attend work, but none of them were fired.” He paused and laughed good-naturedly. “Maybe they will give them a promotion because there are a lot of empty seats now.”

    http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Midd...st-Bahrain-companies-fire-hundreds-of-Shiites
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #97
    2 of the political prisoners died yesterday in jail. Interior ministry says that one of them tried to make a mess in jail and the security interferred and "killed" him. The other one was ill.

    Here is the news in Arabic
    http://www.alwasatnews.com/3137/news/read/536562/1.html

    The people in Bahrain say that the two of them were tortured to death in jail.
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #98
    Human Rights Watch says that a fourth prisoner was tortured to death in jail. He is the fourth one to die as a result of toture in 9 days. His only guilt was that he went before a week to the police to complain about the intention of destroying one of his relatives house. He has been in jail since that day.

    Long Live Arab regimes...
     

    JBF

    اختك يا زمن
    Aug 5, 2006
    18,451
    The government is taking legal action against the opposing parties in the country. As if massacres haven't already been committed without any legal sentence.


    What a fucking joke this regime is.

    The regime isn't wahhabi in Bahrain.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)