How'd you guess? 
: Of your last 20 posts, 10 (50%) were either directly naming statistics or interpreting them. That's well above the SP/P (Statpost per post) ratio of the average tuz user (13%).
Buy on AliExpress.com
Azzurri Thread (18 Viewers)
- Thread starter Marceℓℓo
- Start date
Let me put it in a way you'll understand :
Of your last 20 posts, 10 (50%) were either directly naming statistics or interpreting them. That's well above the SP/P (Statpost per post) ratio of the average tuz user (13%).
: Of your last 20 posts, 10 (50%) were either directly naming statistics or interpreting them. That's well above the SP/P (Statpost per post) ratio of the average tuz user (13%).
Buy on AliExpress.com
Let me put it in a way you'll understand :
Of your last 20 posts, 10 (50%) were either directly naming statistics or interpreting them. That's well above the SP/P (Statpost per post) ratio of the average tuz user (13%).
: Of your last 20 posts, 10 (50%) were either directly naming statistics or interpreting them. That's well above the SP/P (Statpost per post) ratio of the average tuz user (13%).
Close You got 5 posts (25%) mentioning James directly, and two or three more in the follow up discussion, depending on how strictly you set the criteria
But multiple mentions are possible.
Fun fact: You've got a formation incidence rate of 15%, which is putting you in the top tier on the tuz in that metric, although you're still far away from frontrunner rakib (41%)
You got 5 posts (25%) mentioning James directly, and two or three more in the follow up discussion, depending on how strictly you set the criteria But multiple mentions are possible.
Fun fact: You've got a formation incidence rate of 15%, which is putting you in the top tier on the tuz in that metric, although you're still far away from frontrunner rakib (41%)
Close You got 5 posts (25%) mentioning James directly, and two or three more in the follow up discussion, depending on how strictly you set the criteria
But multiple mentions are possible.
Fun fact: You've got a formation incidence rate of 15%, which is putting you in the top tier on the tuz in that metric, although you're still far away from frontrunner rakib (41%)
You got 5 posts (25%) mentioning James directly, and two or three more in the follow up discussion, depending on how strictly you set the criteria But multiple mentions are possible.
Fun fact: You've got a formation incidence rate of 15%, which is putting you in the top tier on the tuz in that metric, although you're still far away from frontrunner rakib (41%)
Close You got 5 posts (25%) mentioning James directly, and two or three more in the follow up discussion, depending on how strictly you set the criteria
But multiple mentions are possible.
Fun fact: You've got a formation incidence rate of 15%, which is putting you in the top tier on the tuz in that metric, although you're still far away from frontrunner rakib (41%)
You got 5 posts (25%) mentioning James directly, and two or three more in the follow up discussion, depending on how strictly you set the criteria But multiple mentions are possible.
Fun fact: You've got a formation incidence rate of 15%, which is putting you in the top tier on the tuz in that metric, although you're still far away from frontrunner rakib (41%)
@Osman
Nah, Belotti is better. More complete. Rossi was great too, its a shame about all the injuries. Truly a wasted career. Cassano, Rossi, Giovinco, Balotelli how much wasted potential in an azzurri generation.
Insigne and Belotti already look better than them, hopefully they keep coming through. Immobile and El Shaarawy need to step up too.
Insigne and Belotti already look better than them, hopefully they keep coming through. Immobile and El Shaarawy need to step up too.
I think we'll need more experience than that since the next tournament is just a year away. Buffon, Candreva, Marchisio, De Rossi, Immobile, Chiellini, Barzagli will be in the conversation. If Ventura continues with the 4-4-2, I would like to see the option of a 4-4-1-1 with Bernardeschi in the hole.
-------------------Belotti---------------------------------
Insigne------------------Bernardeschi---------Candreva
--------------De Rossi-----------Verratti-----------------
Antonelli------Chiellini--------Bonucci-------Zappacosta
------------------------Buffon-----------------------------
With Immobile, El Shaarawy, Berardi, Gagliardini, Marchisio, Petagna, Parolo, Romagnoli, Barzagli, De Sciglio, Darmian, Donnarumma, Perin on the bench.
Looks like a great team imo. It depends on how Florenzi and Bonaventura come back ofc.
Also Petagna can be swapped with whichever CF is most on form (Falcinelli, Pavoletti, Caprari, Lapadula, Borriello, Balotelli).
-------------------Belotti---------------------------------
Insigne------------------Bernardeschi---------Candreva
--------------De Rossi-----------Verratti-----------------
Antonelli------Chiellini--------Bonucci-------Zappacosta
------------------------Buffon-----------------------------
With Immobile, El Shaarawy, Berardi, Gagliardini, Marchisio, Petagna, Parolo, Romagnoli, Barzagli, De Sciglio, Darmian, Donnarumma, Perin on the bench.
Looks like a great team imo. It depends on how Florenzi and Bonaventura come back ofc.
Also Petagna can be swapped with whichever CF is most on form (Falcinelli, Pavoletti, Caprari, Lapadula, Borriello, Balotelli).
Cassano showcased more ability than pretty much any other player in the planet but he never did it consistently. Always some issue, first it was discipline on the field, then it was issues off the field, finally it was lack of fitness. Cassano was never as consistently deadly as Insigne and Belotti have been. He turn it up for a game or two, but not for 30 games in a season.
you watch the hunter x hunter
Seven described Ocelot in a way that made me think of the fat Zoldyck evil genius lol.- - - Updated - - -
You have a point, especially Belotti who is having the kind of deadly season very few do, but Cassano's way to perform wasnt like this, and Insigne is yet to reach Cassano Roma level IMO. Which is pretty much the only place were he was consistently great for longer stretch, and not just super skilled or talented.
He doesnt, I do Seven described Ocelot in a way that made me think of the fat Zoldyck evil genius lol.
- - - Updated - - -
You have a point, especially Belotti who is having the kind of deadly season very few do, but Cassano's way to perform wasnt like this, and Insigne is yet to reach Cassano Roma level IMO. Which is pretty much the only place were he was consistently great for longer stretch, and not just super skilled or talented.
Seven described Ocelot in a way that made me think of the fat Zoldyck evil genius lol.- - - Updated - - -
You have a point, especially Belotti who is having the kind of deadly season very few do, but Cassano's way to perform wasnt like this, and Insigne is yet to reach Cassano Roma level IMO. Which is pretty much the only place were he was consistently great for longer stretch, and not just super skilled or talented.