Are we keeping the loaned players (ie have we already bought them) - poll please (1 Viewer)

[Zlatan]

I am not trying to put anything in your mouth, I am just saying my opinion about your logic. Which in fact you presented to show that the board actually lied and said they loaned players they actually intended to buy. Most of them bad deals.

I dont think they're all bad buys. IMO Quaq is a good deal, Pepe so and so, and Matri is ok although a bit expensive.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[JCK]

I dont think they're all bad buys. IMO Quaq is a good deal, Pepe so and so, and Matri is ok although a bit expensive.

It seems you're the one putting words in my mouth as I did not say "all bad".

 

[Zlatan]

It seems you're the one putting words in my mouth as I did not say "all bad".

You said most. One of three is not most, it's 1/3rd

 

[JCK]

You said most. One of three is not most, it's 1/3rd

You are only satisfied with Quag's which makes it most.

 

[Zlatan]

You are only satisfied with Quag's which makes it most.

There's a difference between being 100% satisfied, thinking its an ok deal but a bit expensive and thinking its a terrible deal.

But still, doesnt really matter.

 

[electricRoo]

I am not trying to put anything in your mouth, I am just saying my opinion about your logic. Which in fact you presented to show that the board actually lied and said they loaned players they actually intended to buy. Most of them bad deals.

This is business, gentlemen's agreements happen all the time. Like it has been said, admitting to being bound to buy them would be illegal to the eyes of the lega. it's a business, thinking in terms of lies or truth is very naive.

 

[Zlatan]

Marotta is your point about market strategies and reply to those questions and the design, made up of many loans with redemption right and obligation to: "Juve on loan? Once and for all, we have no obligation''

End of argument from the horses mouth Zlatan. Can you accept it now?

Do you have a complex admitting you're wrong?

I keed, I keed