Are terrorist groups racist? (1 Viewer)

[Bjerknes]

Well. I can not blame Somali guys who are being killed in their own country since 20 years. So, the real terrorists are those who came to Somalia just to kill people and to impose a stupid regime on the people there.

On the other hand, Obama is not qualified to comment on that as he is killing tens of civilians all around the world. And by the way, saying that Somalis are racists because they killed Africans is just as stupid as the Israeli accusation of Arabs to be Anti-semitic, Knowing that Somalis ARE Africans and Arabs ARE Semitics.

Yes, lets kill a bunch of Ugandans because their government supports our own government, which we hate. That's really heart warming that you can't blame them, especially since those that were slaughtered probably don't have anything to do with it.

Ipso facto, you do indeed condone terrorism and the murder of innocent people.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[ReBeL]

I'm saying stop taking seriously whatever Obama says.

He should keep talking about Miami Heat. At least, he may have an idea about that.

 

[Fred]

I actually find it a good initiative by the Americans if they do proceed with the mosque. It's as if they open a new chapter by this showing the world that ground zero wasn't in fact the place for a war between Americans and Muslims but rather terrorism and innocent people where the latter tragically lost but such a loss couldn't continue and by opening this mosque a few blocks away from ground zero they're opening their hearts to muslims who have had no part in such terror that struck them almost as hard as it struck Americans.




No I didn't actually but my all time favorite is the one where he claims Shakespeare is in fact a Libyan who is calle Al Shei5 Zobair and that he moved for England looking to improve his life and their he exploded and the English are taking all the credit for Libyan blood

Ya that one was great too

He's killing Afghans and Iraqis because he cares about employment. No US president would ever accept budget cuts for the biggest social employment organization of all: the military.

But to keep the military growing (until it becomes as big as North Korea's) you need a constant threat, you need wars.

You do know that by saying that, you are indirectly admitting that Obama isn't very different than those terrorist groups leaders?

 

[Martin]

You do know that by saying that, you are indirectly admitting that Obama isn't very different than those terrorist groups leaders?

What do I care about Obama's reputation?

 

[ReBeL]

Yes, lets kill a bunch of Ugandans because their government supports our own government, which we hate. That's really heart warming that you can't blame them, especially since those that were slaughtered probably don't have anything to do with it.

Ipso facto, you do indeed condone terrorism and the murder of innocent people.

I don't support this act. If they attacked the Ugandan government symbols or the Ugandan army, I would have understood it, but attacking civilians is a step in the wrong path. I feel their misery though.

 

[Fred]

What do I care about Obama's reputation?

I didn't mean you care about his reputation.


Replying to Rebels comment that Obama is no better than these terrorist groups because he too kills innocent civilians, you said that he does so to prevent unemployment, the military needs a constant threat, it needs wars. So in essence both do not mind the slaughter of innocent citizens for their "grand goals", which brings us back to Rebels point, that they're not that different from each other.


Back to the topic of this thread. As inhumane as these terrorist groups are, i don't think they're racist. As long as you subscribe to their beliefs you're safe, whether you're black, brown, yellow or white. I'd say they're sectarians, the worst kind there is. They think infidels should be wiped out, jews are all evil, and a large percentage of the muslim population is just as "bad" as the infidels, therefore killing them is permissible(as if killing non muslims was permissible in the first place).