Appiah or blasi (1 Viewer)

erado

Junior Member
Nov 2, 2004
343
#45
++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++
Blasi: technically better
Appiah: better physically

oh.. i tot is the other way round.. :confused:

Blasi is physically stronger and high work rate while Appiah is better in his passes and going forward..:D
 

Ahmed_

Bench Warmer
Dec 23, 2002
770
#46
++ [ originally posted by ZhiXin ] ++
Personally I prefer Emerson + Maresca.

Marseca pls come back! and Chiellini too! Let Micooli rot in Viola by himself.

It is not a bad idea to call back Miccoli with the others. Then, we can get rid of Zala*****
 

denco

Superior Being
Jul 12, 2002
4,679
#47
Its a very tough decision to make actually as both cannot pass the ball properly but Blasi covers more ground than Appiah does. Been impressed with both though but if push comes to shove, id have to go for .....................................
 

Mr. Gol

Senior Member
Sep 15, 2004
3,472
#50
++ [ originally posted by Ahmed ] ++



It is not a bad idea to call back Miccoli with the others. Then, we can get rid of Zala*****
Miccoli would never sit on the bench, certainly not as the fourth striker.

And I think Blasi is the better player to use. Besides that Appiah is basicly a worse version of Emerson, and Blasi is our midfield barbarian.
 

Muha

The Head Physio
Feb 25, 2004
1,546
#51
i think blasi is more effective ... he is a classical defending midfielder ...Viera's style .... blasi = mass destruction in midfield
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)