Antonio Conte (142 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Tags goat coach
I dont think that will work.
433 is the answer for us.... but we need to bring at the very least one of Berardi or Gabiadini...and to sign a proper backup/contender to asamoah and Licht...2 if possible, to have 4 variations on the wings for the 352 (lets be sincere.. the 352 is our bread and butter in serie A and as long as we hace conte and pirlo here, that will not change).
Gabiadini and/or Berardi, plus 2 quality wingbacks is a pretty realistic transfer plan...as long as the wingback is not Dimaria or the likes who would cost 30+ mils.
433 is the answer for us.... but we need to bring at the very least one of Berardi or Gabiadini...and to sign a proper backup/contender to asamoah and Licht...2 if possible, to have 4 variations on the wings for the 352 (lets be sincere.. the 352 is our bread and butter in serie A and as long as we hace conte and pirlo here, that will not change).
Gabiadini and/or Berardi, plus 2 quality wingbacks is a pretty realistic transfer plan...as long as the wingback is not Dimaria or the likes who would cost 30+ mils.
Our current 3-5-2 would smash that team 5-1.
Gio and Berardi on the wings at this stage in Berardis career is something you'd expect to see at Parma.
Why is Criscito who's a natural left back playing on the right, so that Licht a natural right back can play on the left?
Plus Chiellini and Barzagli are on the wrong side.
My god.
Gio and Berardi on the wings at this stage in Berardis career is something you'd expect to see at Parma.
Why is Criscito who's a natural left back playing on the right, so that Licht a natural right back can play on the left?
Plus Chiellini and Barzagli are on the wrong side.
My god.
Exactly
Pirlo would barely be useful as a sub in a 4-2-4, imagine an over-worked Vidal at the 70 minute mark having to cover for Pirlo, and imagine how open we would be on the counter
I'd rather stick to a 3-5-2 unless our front 4 in a 4-2-4 was some sort of 300 million mega-line up. So, basically. No.
Pirlo would barely be useful as a sub in a 4-2-4, imagine an over-worked Vidal at the 70 minute mark having to cover for Pirlo, and imagine how open we would be on the counter
I'd rather stick to a 3-5-2 unless our front 4 in a 4-2-4 was some sort of 300 million mega-line up. So, basically. No.
The thing I noticed most is the great amount of spaces and chances ve've concede after we switched to that wide 4-3-3 in the last 15, risking to concede the 1-1, since the moment when Vidal went on for Isla with Marchisio RW, but even later with Giovinco. 'Bout Pirlo, don't know if you remember, but had a tremendous decisive tackle at the limit of the area in the dying minutes to deny an almost sure goal for Traszbonshit. Yesterday he was the most focused among our mids.
Well we can't bench Tevez because Llo-Osvaldo doesn't look as if it would work at all.
And we can't really play our two strikers every single game without consequences. I fail to see why we would stop playing Osvaldo after he scored 1 goal in his first start for Juve. Not to mention he wasn't on the pitch that long.
And we can't really play our two strikers every single game without consequences. I fail to see why we would stop playing Osvaldo after he scored 1 goal in his first start for Juve. Not to mention he wasn't on the pitch that long.
