Antonio Conte (174 Viewers)

How would you rate Conte's (dis)appointment?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5


Results are only viewable after voting.
Jul 1, 2010
26,352
If Palazzi considers that to be the case, they should all be charged.

If they were at the meeting and Conte said the game was fixed, they are also guilty of failing to report fixing.

And dismissing the 23 because they have something to gain by saying what the did, presumably means Carobbio is also unreliable because what he said got him a drastically reduced punishment.
Spot fucking on.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
There's one thing I don't understand and that's this sentence:


I thought what he was trying to do was for a fact to convince them that Carobbio is not credible?
All he's saying is that there is no reason for Carobbio to be believed and the 23 not to be believed.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
If Palazzi considers that to be the case, they should all be charged.

If they were at the meeting and Conte said the game was fixed, they are also guilty of failing to report fixing.

And dismissing the 23 because they have something to gain by saying what the did, presumably means Carobbio is also unreliable because what he said got him a drastically reduced punishment.
Exactly what I saying. Good post. :tup:
 

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,426
If Palazzi considers that to be the case, they should all be charged.

If they were at the meeting and Conte said the game was fixed, they are also guilty of failing to report fixing.

And dismissing the 23 because they have something to gain by saying what the did, presumably means Carobbio is also unreliable because what he said got him a drastically reduced punishment.
Well thats the question??? I dont know that were his words but he did Not say why he didn't accuse the others
 
Jun 30, 2009
5
“Yesterday’s decision of the FIGC Disciplinary Commission to reject an offer of a plea bargain that had already been pondered and underwritten by the Prosecutor, is proof of the total inadequacy of the sporting justice system and the Federation within which it operates,” continued Agnelli.

“I must again point out the incapability this structure has of interpreting the needs of modern professional football at the highest level.
This is War! Forza Agnelli!
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,750
If Palazzi considers that to be the case, they should all be charged.

If they were at the meeting and Conte said the game was fixed, they are also guilty of failing to report fixing.

And dismissing the 23 because they have something to gain by saying what the did, presumably means Carobbio is also unreliable because what he said got him a drastically reduced punishment.
BOOM!!!!!

Red, you're a freaking lawyer genius.
 

shouldline31

Junior Member
May 9, 2012
321
I just read this

"Carobbio’s testimony is considered credible in accusing Conte despite the fact another 23 Siena players who were in the team meeting also testified that the Coach never alluded to any fixed games."
source: http://football-italia.net/22570/juventus-attack-dictatorial-figc

it doesnt make sense, how FIGC considered that carobbio's testimony was credible despite other 23 players do not said so. :sergio:
 
Apr 15, 2006
56,640
I just read this

"Carobbio’s testimony is considered credible in accusing Conte despite the fact another 23 Siena players who were in the team meeting also testified that the Coach never alluded to any fixed games."
source: http://football-italia.net/22570/juventus-attack-dictatorial-figc

it doesnt make sense, how FIGC considered that carobbio's testimony was credible despite other 23 players do not said so. :sergio:
Because one does not simply prove their innocence to the Italian Sporting Justice system.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 11, Guests: 151)