Antonio Conte (241 Viewers)

How would you rate Conte's (dis)appointment?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5


Results are only viewable after voting.

Fint

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2010
19,354
On Monday, we'll make a urgent request for Conte to be on the bench for the Udinese game until the TNA.
:tup:

Watching the press conference now, although I haven't a clue what's being said, Conte's passion and anger is very apparent to the point that it gives me goosebumps

---------- Post added 23.08.2012 at 23:45 ----------

If the 10 month ban is upheld, it means it will start from September then, right?
Enjoying your updates on Twitter btw :tup: and then the following copy & paste job Badass Vidal is doing :D
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Gerd

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
I don't understand something , mantronunzio said it himself that he was injured and that was the reason he didn't play , so why didn't conte's laywers confirm that and bring it to trial , that would have been contrary to what carobbio has said if i am not mistaken , which makes him less credible
 

only-juve

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2008
7,451
Ever since calciopoli bullshet in 2006, nothing surprise me anymore in Italy.

And for those who still support Italian clubs in Europe (for the good of Italian football bullshit) I say WAKE THE FUCK UP !!
 
May 4, 2004
11,622

Juve_fanatic

Second coolest member!
Apr 5, 2006
7,617
I don't understand something , mantronunzio said it himself that he was injured and that was the reason he didn't play , so why didn't conte's laywers confirm that and bring it to trial , that would have been contrary to what carobbio has said if i am not mistaken , which makes him less credible
We should just stop asking questions anymore. This is ridiculous. We know shit about law and yet we are able to see all the irregularities in this trial. That just goes to show how stupid this whole case is. FUCK FIGC FUCK PALAZI FUCK FUCK!!
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,622
it's so stupid!

so Conte was accused for 2 games and got 10 months...now only one game and still got 10 months.

AND for that game there are 2 points that got him a suspension:

1. Stellini was involved then because he was in Conte's staff he should have known about him.

2. Mastronunzio. They say Conte didn't use him because he knew about the fix.

I don't see in the 1st point how you can accuse Conte of knowing something because his staff member was involved in this shit and in the 2nd point Mastronunzio was never a regular at Siena and was injured in the last 3 games. There's an article confirming it on Siena's official site! Also, today he confirmed that Conte was not involved and didn't that something was going on.
 

Gerd

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
We should just stop asking questions anymore. This is ridiculous. We know shit about law and yet we are able to see all the irregularities in this trial. That just goes to show how stupid this whole case is. FUCK FIGC FUCK PALAZI FUCK FUCK!!
I am not actually saying anything against the trial this time , i am dubious of conte's lawyers , conte when was asked about manstronuzio said that he was injured althrough he didn't remember it clearly and this was deemed as not credible . His lawyers could have easily found proof that he was injured , they could have easily found the official statement of his injury (manstronunzio confirmed the injury himself) . Carobbio said that conte left manstronunzio out because he didn't agree to fix the match . If they actually had sent proof of his injury to trial it would clearly mean that carobbio lied which would make conte innocent . Bad job from the lawyers

Still the strongest accusation against conte has fallen , the one for siena-novara , i am pretty sure that the second one will fall too , i just hope it does as soon as possible
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 234)