Andy for Mod (or if you have any other suggestions make them here) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,307
#81
++ [ originally posted by fabiana ] ++
I dont know why Andy would suck being a mod. He contributes a lot to this forum and people know him

I dont think he would abuse his powers if he got into any arguments and if Zlatan wanted it and got it I dont know why Andrew shouldnt get it
You're biased when it's about Andy. He would definitely abuse his powers and gets caught up in heavy discussions far too much. He's also too arrogant to be a decent mod and he would hardly feel the need to explain his decisions.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
#82
++ [ originally posted by fabiana ] ++
I dont know why Andy would suck being a mod. He contributes a lot to this forum and people know him

I dont think he would abuse his powers if he got into any arguments and if Zlatan wanted it and got it I dont know why Andrew shouldnt get it
I think we're at our quota now, which makes it kind of redundant. Andy's a good guy and a good poster. Maybe next time.
 

Negative Creep

Senior Member
Mar 7, 2005
573
#86
Oh yeah?

Have you a reason for these bannings? Really, I can't have an opinion on you like you do on Nicole? You can post to tell the forum how a member isn't good enough for mod but I can't post to say how you aren't? Fliakis/Jaecole and others can post to say how Zlatan/Andy are bad moderator choices yet I can't say you aren't for perfectly valid reasons?

Ban as you will, that should keep the fact that you are a total prick covered for alittle bit more. Idiot member, bland member and wouldn't be recognisable at all if not for your moderation. Not for on topic, not for off. Hired because you are not unlike Martin. Though you have shown how good a moderator you are. Can't ask for more than that so much thanks.

Youre a ***** btw.

Oh and not that it matters but I wanted to name IncuboRossonero, Shadowfax and Kaiser Franco as mods. Why are people fvcking around with a bunch of kids that are power hungry and want it more than anything? They have been trying for this since the takeover and you give them it. Kids who will blow a load any time a girl joins. Kids who are about as useful as unbiased as Mikhail? That's gonna fvcking change everything :howler:

Catch you in a few weeks when Mikhail has had his fix ;)
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#89
There is no logic to her being banned. Mikhail should find out what's going on before he pulls the trigger. Now he has an active Burke with a banned Blandest and the mess begins again..
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
#90
++ [ originally posted by Negative Creep ] ++
Have you a reason for these bannings?
Yes. Many, many of them. If they're not clear to you, read the rules. And it's a ban, not multiple bannings. You are banned, not Blandest, Turdface, or whatever stupid handle you've registered under this time.

Really, I can't have an opinion on you like you do on Nicole? You can post to tell the forum how a member isn't good enough for mod but I can't post to say how you aren't? Fliakis/Jaecole and others can post to say how Zlatan/Andy are bad moderator choices yet I can't say you aren't for perfectly valid reasons?
They can, and you could. Only you're banned. Comprendé?

Ban as you will, that should keep the fact that you are a total prick covered for alittle bit more. Idiot member, bland member and wouldn't be recognisable at all if not for your moderation. Not for on topic, not for off. Hired because you are not unlike Martin. Though you have shown how good a moderator you are. Can't ask for more than that so much thanks.

Youre a ***** btw...
Water off a duck's back. You really show yourself up with this sort of stuff.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#93
Mikhail...

Would it be possible for you to state the actual reasons for the various bannings so that everyone understands...

In various threads all over the forum there are people asking why was so and so banned... what about him, oh but she did this etc etc... Its ridiculous and to be frank fvcking boring...

So much easier if you jus told every one a straight reason and thats that
 

Dragon

Senior Member
Apr 24, 2003
27,407
#94
++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


You're biased when it's about Andy. He would definitely abuse his powers and gets caught up in heavy discussions far too much. He's also too arrogant to be a decent mod and he would hardly feel the need to explain his decisions.
I am not biased towards Andy, I said that I did not think that he would abuse his powers, and if he were ever to be a mod and he did abuse them Id eat my words.
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#95
++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++

Do you have a link to that? I can't see the logic in that.
You're a mod not me. Why didn't you pounce on Burke when he revealed the 'glitch'? Dosen't make sense that's all.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
#96
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++
Mikhail...

Would it be possible for you to state the actual reasons for the various bannings so that everyone understands...

In various threads all over the forum there are people asking why was so and so banned... what about him, oh but she did this etc etc... Its ridiculous and to be frank fvcking boring...

So much easier if you jus told every one a straight reason and thats that
Good point Paul. It couldn't hurt to have a thread in the announcements section each time. As for Claire, I'll leave the list at persistant abusive behaviour towards other members, mainly because I didn't write it all down at the time.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
#98
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++
You're a mod not me. Why didn't you pounce on Burke when he revealed the 'glitch'? Dosen't make sense that's all.
Mainly because I wasn't here at the time. I don't see him around. I'll talk to Marty et al though before making any further bannings, including to Claire's other aliases.
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
Well you just banned someone twice and then said i'll put it down to this. That's a load of crap now come on. But yeah do what you said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)