American NFL Football (79 Viewers)
- Thread starter Torkel
- Start date
It’s a trade. So it is exactly what it sounds like. Two teams will swap assets. In the NFL the assets are picks and players. In this case the Steelers want a 1st round draft pick. So the first team to offer a 1st round pick or close to in will likely get the player.
The trade won’t result in him AB getting paid any more than he already is. He’ll have the opportunity to negotiate with his new team but that’s only after the trade happens.
The trade won’t result in him AB getting paid any more than he already is. He’ll have the opportunity to negotiate with his new team but that’s only after the trade happens.
Cardinal rule of NFL GM-ing - don't go balls deep on players Pats themselves don't make an effort to keep and/or players who have been successful only for the Pats.
Raiders are gonna learn that rule the hard way as soon as training camp starts ...
- - - Updated - - -
there are three facets to an NFL team, not just offenses. Just like a bad defense can lose you a game in the 4th quarter, they should be able to lose you the game in OT.
Anyways, point was none of this would be happening if the Pats had not won that game. Rams had no issue with the ways the rules are now. I am certain KC wouldn't be crying if they had managed to stop the Pats (or gotten the ball first in OT).
KC got straight-up outplayed and came up short in so many ways and were incredibly lucky to even take the game to OT, in the first place. After the game, only thing Reid could master was a bunch of excuses and even implied it was the refs fault why they hadn't warned Dee Ford for lining up off-side. Fat fuck lacks even basic sense for accountability, so bitching about rule changes is right up his alley.
Raiders are gonna learn that rule the hard way as soon as training camp starts ...
- - - Updated - - -
there are three facets to an NFL team, not just offenses. Just like a bad defense can lose you a game in the 4th quarter, they should be able to lose you the game in OT.
Anyways, point was none of this would be happening if the Pats had not won that game. Rams had no issue with the ways the rules are now. I am certain KC wouldn't be crying if they had managed to stop the Pats (or gotten the ball first in OT).
KC got straight-up outplayed and came up short in so many ways and were incredibly lucky to even take the game to OT, in the first place. After the game, only thing Reid could master was a bunch of excuses and even implied it was the refs fault why they hadn't warned Dee Ford for lining up off-side. Fat fuck lacks even basic sense for accountability, so bitching about rule changes is right up his alley.
Last edited:
