American NFL Football (35 Viewers)

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
you picked up forte's study, a player you dont need, just to use it for this trade, anyhoos keep your trades and advice to yourself, im done dealing with you
I picked up an asset I may not need today but may well need tomorrow. Forte could be out 2 weeks, in which case Langford would be indeed useless to me, but he could be out 4-5 weeks or even end up on the IR if there are complications. In the latter case, Langford has a floor of an RB2.

With the way RBs have been falling down this year, what's to guarantee I won't lose Gurly and/or another starting RB this coming week? Yesterday's depth is tomorrow's shortcoming, if you are not careful. A player's value is not be determined by what he's already done but what he may be worth from now on. As I said, an asset.

Similarly with Lafell. He's about done rediscovering his chemistry with Brady and should be an easy WR3-WR2 from now on
even in tough match-ups.

You seem to be taking all this a bit too personal. I just made an offer, which I thought/think is pretty decent, especially if factor in future production. You don't like it, so be it, just say no.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,933
I picked up an asset I may not need today but may well need tomorrow. Forte could be out 2 weeks, in which case Langford would be indeed useless to me, but he could be out 4-5 weeks or even end up on the IR if there are complications. In the latter case, Langford has a floor of an RB2.

With the way RBs have been falling down this year, what's to guarantee I won't lose Gurly and/or another starting RB this coming week? Yesterday's depth is tomorrow's shortcoming, if you are not careful. A player's value is not be determined by what he's already done but what he may be worth from now on. As I said, an asset.

Similarly with Lafell. He's about done rediscovering his chemistry with Brady and should be an easy WR3-WR2 from now on
even in tough match-ups.

You seem to be taking all this a bit too personal. I just made an offer, which I thought/think is pretty decent, especially if factor in future production. You don't like it, so be it, just say no.
langford has 0 value with a fit forte, like i said a voller move, you two are more alike than you think :D
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
langford has 0 value with a fit forte, like i said a voller move, you two are more alike than you think :D
I'll take that as a compliment :D

A fit Forte? Where? :p
True, outside of TD vulturing, but whatever statements there are on Forte's condition out there, don't sound overly optimistic for a quick return. Until then, I am gonna hold onto Langford for one never knows. ;)
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
langford has 0 value with a fit forte, like i said a voller move, you two are more alike than you think :D
WTF are you talking about? I haven't done anything like this.

Not that there's anything wrong in what acmilan is doing though. You are a little crybaby about it.
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
all good, this just not my year, but not going down without a fight
You actually have a very good roster, besides lacking depth at RB, which became an issue mainly after Forte went down.

- - - Updated - - -

WTF are you talking about? I haven't done anything like this.

Not that there's anything wrong in what acmilan is doing though. You are a little crybaby about it.
:D :hi:
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
all good, this just not my year, but not going down without a fight
You may not want my advice but here it is anyway - you are starting the wrong QB, again ... :D

- - - Updated - - -

WTF are you talking about? I haven't done anything like this.

Not that there's anything wrong in what acmilan is doing though. You are a little crybaby about it.
Commish, I would like to report an iffy looking trade in Tuzmania - iffy, because it looks suspiciously incompetent :p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 33)