American NFL Football (138 Viewers)
- Thread starter Torkel
- Start date
not disputing the trade. just saying Freeman is the one player you don't trade away, not when you have a perfectly decent QB already and Rodgers is not performing up to his standards from previous years. There are QBs on the waiver wire that can carry you too week to week if not happy with Wilson and Cam.
And Gordon is virtually useless - as much as there is dearth of RB talent in free agency right now, I am pretty sure I can pick up several players that would eb more useful than he is or will be going forward.
congrats, btw
And Gordon is virtually useless - as much as there is dearth of RB talent in free agency right now, I am pretty sure I can pick up several players that would eb more useful than he is or will be going forward.
congrats, btw
not arguable at all just look at his stats and schedule - he has more away games remaining than home ones. Rodgers is average away from home even when playing just decent Ds. And this year he is not playing to his usual standards even at home anyway. There are literally several Qbs in free agency that one can exploit on a match-up basis that can give you the same production or close to it. Rodgers and Luck are function of the NFL's hype to sell tickets, nothing more.
that is not news. they just didn't get to play a real team the past couple of weeks. obviously improved but not worth the hype the NFL has been building around them going into this game.
Guess that's the cardinal rule of fantasy football too - the ability to separate hype from real substance. Who'd have thought, huh?
that is not news. they just didn't get to play a real team the past couple of weeks. obviously improved but not worth the hype the NFL has been building around them going into this game.
Guess that's the cardinal rule of fantasy football too - the ability to separate hype from real substance. Who'd have thought, huh?
This is pretty much the most absurd thing I've read. 
Rodgers average.
You really are ridiculous. By ze way, Rodgers is leading Brady in all the advanced metrics. So I guess Brady sucks too. Passer Rating, QBR for example. Both ahead of Brady, all while playing without Jordy Nelson all season, Davante Adams after game 2, and now Montgomery. 3 of his 4 receivers from preseason out. And he has still led the Pack to 6-0.
Pathetic the shameless nonsense you spout.
Rodgers average.
You really are ridiculous. By ze way, Rodgers is leading Brady in all the advanced metrics. So I guess Brady sucks too. Passer Rating, QBR for example. Both ahead of Brady, all while playing without Jordy Nelson all season, Davante Adams after game 2, and now Montgomery. 3 of his 4 receivers from preseason out. And he has still led the Pack to 6-0.
Pathetic the shameless nonsense you spout.
Rodgers is the only QB to have led NFC 6th seed to SB championship too. Which means, yep, 3 straight road games in playoffs, plus the neutral location Super Bowl. Oh. And that season, on the road in those 4 playoff games. 1094 yards, 68.2 % completion, 9 passing tds, 2 rushing tds, 2 ints. Including a 31-36, 366 yard, 4 td performance on the road against the 1 seed Falcons.
Yep, he sucks on the road.
Yep, he sucks on the road.
Last year, when A-rod was tearing it up at Lambo (and all his WRs heathly), by week 12 or 13 into the season, GB had the same scoring average in away games - 20-21 pts as one of the worst in the league, Tampa Bay, who ended up with the #1 pick in the draft. GB lost to non-playoff teams like Saints and Buffalo, as well as the Lions (possibly someone else too, can't be bothered to look it up now).
But yeah, why let stats get in the way of personal bias. What else could you expect from a delusional person who'd put Rodgers (1 Sb win, 6-5 in the postseason) in the same conversation as Brady and Montana. But you know, if he were to win 3 more SBs, he'd be the best ever, even better than those two ... cause, you know, Sb wins grow on trees and you just have to reach and pick them up. (that's pretty much a word-for-word quote of postironic, not an outbreak of the crazies).
- - - Updated - - -
if there would be trannies into deck cheese, you'd think it would be those up in GB.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, yes, how could I forget - Rodgers the Master had the Legion of Boom wipe their ass off with him and his offense in Seattle in the regular season (everyone was fully healthy, so no excuses there)
But yeah, why let stats get in the way of personal bias. What else could you expect from a delusional person who'd put Rodgers (1 Sb win, 6-5 in the postseason) in the same conversation as Brady and Montana. But you know, if he were to win 3 more SBs, he'd be the best ever, even better than those two ... cause, you know, Sb wins grow on trees and you just have to reach and pick them up. (that's pretty much a word-for-word quote of postironic, not an outbreak of the crazies).
- - - Updated - - -
if there would be trannies into deck cheese, you'd think it would be those up in GB.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, yes, how could I forget - Rodgers the Master had the Legion of Boom wipe their ass off with him and his offense in Seattle in the regular season (everyone was fully healthy, so no excuses there)
I can post stats all day long to show how superior Rodgers is to Brady. As he leads Brady in every single QB measurable.
The difference between you and everyone else here, is that we all acknowledge that Brady is one of the greatest QBs of all time, while you do your best to discredit and fling shit at every other QB in football. I've consistently stated Brady's a top 3 of all time QB for me. And I've never once said Rodgers is in that conversation at this very moment.
I've said if he wins another SB or 2 he certainly will be considering his unprecedented efficiency. There's a reason he has the best passer rating of all time by almost 10 points. And no, it's not the modern era, otherwise multiple QBs would have it. There's a reason he has better career Passer Rating, QBR, YPA, Completion%, TD %, Int %, TD-Int Ratio, in both regular season and post-season over Brady. Will those numbers hold up over the next 7-10 years? Who the hell knows. But statistically speaking, he's been the best QB in the NFL over the last 5 years. Both regular season and post-season. And yes, post-season too. He has the 3rd highest postseason passer rating of all time. And not 1 QB has won more than 1 SB in the last 5 years, the same number Rodgers has won.
Let's get another thing straight. Brady has won 1 Super Bowl since 2005. The same number as Rodgers. Brady has also lost 4 straight playoff match-ups with the Manning brothers. The Giants defense wiped their asses with Brady twice, just like you said Legion of Boom did to Rodgers. Does it diminish his legacy, nope. It just proves the point that even the greats lose big games. So get over yourself and your love for Brady.
You really are pathetic. Your stats are irrelevant and mostly untrue. Generally you post overall numbers and other such nonsense that obviously favour the guy with a longer career. Obviously Brady being 7 years older would have better overall totals, but as far as actual comparable stats go, it's Rodgers running riot over Brady.
Take a -rep for spouting delusional nonsense. Because calling Rodgers average and overrated is just that. And something that flies in the face of every bit of evidence available.
PS. Brady is 7-5 in his last 12 postseason starts with 1 SB since Rodgers replaced Favre in 2008. So prime Brady has had almost identical success to Rodgers. Clueless.
The difference between you and everyone else here, is that we all acknowledge that Brady is one of the greatest QBs of all time, while you do your best to discredit and fling shit at every other QB in football. I've consistently stated Brady's a top 3 of all time QB for me. And I've never once said Rodgers is in that conversation at this very moment.
I've said if he wins another SB or 2 he certainly will be considering his unprecedented efficiency. There's a reason he has the best passer rating of all time by almost 10 points. And no, it's not the modern era, otherwise multiple QBs would have it. There's a reason he has better career Passer Rating, QBR, YPA, Completion%, TD %, Int %, TD-Int Ratio, in both regular season and post-season over Brady. Will those numbers hold up over the next 7-10 years? Who the hell knows. But statistically speaking, he's been the best QB in the NFL over the last 5 years. Both regular season and post-season. And yes, post-season too. He has the 3rd highest postseason passer rating of all time. And not 1 QB has won more than 1 SB in the last 5 years, the same number Rodgers has won.
Let's get another thing straight. Brady has won 1 Super Bowl since 2005. The same number as Rodgers. Brady has also lost 4 straight playoff match-ups with the Manning brothers. The Giants defense wiped their asses with Brady twice, just like you said Legion of Boom did to Rodgers. Does it diminish his legacy, nope. It just proves the point that even the greats lose big games. So get over yourself and your love for Brady.
You really are pathetic. Your stats are irrelevant and mostly untrue. Generally you post overall numbers and other such nonsense that obviously favour the guy with a longer career. Obviously Brady being 7 years older would have better overall totals, but as far as actual comparable stats go, it's Rodgers running riot over Brady.
Take a -rep for spouting delusional nonsense. Because calling Rodgers average and overrated is just that. And something that flies in the face of every bit of evidence available.
PS. Brady is 7-5 in his last 12 postseason starts with 1 SB since Rodgers replaced Favre in 2008. So prime Brady has had almost identical success to Rodgers. Clueless.
