I see what you're saying, but I think that BB took a look at his value chart, and saw Garropolo there and felt he was too good to pass up. If you think about it, the elite edge rushers were gone by that time, as well as the top safeties on the board, 2 areas of need for the Patriots this year. The top tight ends were off the board at that point as well. I was certain that Stefarian-Jenkins would have been there at 62, and that is who the Patriots would have drafted. Do you stray off of your charts to jump and grab a player of need? It's great if you can accomplish both with your picks, but Garropolo should have never been there at the 62nd pick to begin with. Besides, they have plenty of picks in the 4th round where they could fill some holes.
- - - Updated - - -
@acmilan In your honest opinion, what do you think of what the 49ers have done so far?
in the end of the day I can only hypothesize what grade they had on certain players but based on their picks, I guess the plain and simple explanation is we don't agree on those grades. Not sure how true, but rumors suggest that the Pats were really high on Easley and he was the best player on their board all along and passed on trading out of the 1st (or picking other top talent there) for him. As mentioned, it's his red flags that make me grade him as a very risky pick and not lack of talent. Same with Garappolo - I guess we just don't agree on the grade they had for him which implied he was a priority pick; again, not due to lack of talent but circumstances outside of that.
Ideally, I'd have seen them trade out of the 1st and create additional picks in the 2/3 round range or whatever. Teh reality is that I can only hypothesize what they offers they may or may not have had. What I do know for sure is that they took a huge risk with their top pick and aren't getting any contribution whatsoever from the top 3 rounds. In a draft like this one, I think there would have ultimately been enough players highly graded by the Pats to maximize the value out of those 1-3 round range picks, with or without trading out of the 1st.
Now they are facing a situation where the only way to improve the roster for the 2014 season thru the draft would be those 4-7 rd range, where picks are more likely to be a miss than a hit and even if a player does turn out to be something, he'd usually require more time to develop. Either way, the chances of hitting on a immediate contributor there aren't too good, say the least. Special teams and depth they'd not want to test is what they realistically should hope to find there.
In short, coming out of what is touted as the best and deepest draft class in recent memory, the Pats would not have raised the ceiling of quality of their roster one bit for the 2014 season, and quite possibly beyond too given Easley's injury history and JG's role likely limited to just being a back-up.
Anyways, no point really crying over spilled milk now. On to the 49ers - I think they are doing a great job and have improved their depth and ensured their future at some key positions. Outside of the B. Thomas pick, which was obviously made with next year in mind, they have added players that were some of the best at their respective positions, who'd contribute immediately and likely to become starters in a year or two and M. Martin's case, as soon as the 2014 season. Borland is the only player who I don't see as a long-term starter among these picks but think he was drafted with the idea of providing solid depth at LB and ST even after Bowman returns.
I'd have been generally concerned with the lack of a pick at CB, considering that was the biggest weakness of the roster going into the draft but the 9ers are in good position there too. After the top CB crop was gone in the 1st, most of the next wave of Cbs have fallen to the 3rd day anyway. So, not getting a CB so far but focusing on other positions has worked out very well for you considering most of your targets at Cb outside the 1st round are still on the board.
Adding Stevie Johnson in FA made up for missing out on one of the real playmakers at WR in the 1st round, at least to an extent.
So, all in all, if I were a 9ers fan I would be very happy with this haul - you guys have already improved upon what was a very solid roster anyway, will likely build onto it today in drafting a CB or two. On top of that, you have a player like Tank C to look forward to adding to the roster form last year. Same could be said for RB Lattimer but with his injury history, I'd tread lightly there for the foreseeable future.