What do you guys think now, would it have been better if we bought Huntelaar instead of Amauri ?
Many wanted KJC and they didn't want Amauri. They had very good reasons for that. Huntelaar is 3 years younger, he scores goals for fun, even if it's only in the Dutch league, and he looked too superior compared to the other strikers from his generation. Amauri on the other hand, even though he was 28, had no experience playing on the biggest stage, no CL experience, never scoring many goals etc.
What do you think now ? Do you think we'd have been better/same/worse if we had Huntelaar instead of Amauri.
Ok, it's tough to answer this since we've seen Amauri in Juve and we didn't see KJC, but you can make a guess what was going to happen if we had the Dutchman.