Amauri Carvalho de Oliveira (34 Viewers)

At what cost would you be ok with Amauri?

  • Giovinco + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + Giovinco

  • Nocerino + Almiron + Marchionni

  • Almiron + Marchionni + cash

  • Fuck no, don't want him at all

  • Almiron+cash

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

dao_nq

Junior Member
#3,702
Feb 6, 2008
325
#3,702
I don't think Mancini is better, it's just because Aquilani didn't have enough chance to show what he's worth. Furthermore, Aquilani have better mentality than Mancini, I mean he has more our spirit than Mancini.

Just my 2 cent.
 
Orgut

Orgut

Senior Member
#3,705
Dec 31, 2002
19,322
#3,705
Amauri is a good player but I wouldn`t be too upset if we lose on him and give Lanzafame a chance (he is quite good if you haven`t seen him...)

Second thing I rate Zebina as a pretty good player I think he is quite underated but so is Mancini and between them both I would take Mancini even if Mancini is clearly better as a winger
(He could also be a solution to the Molinaro problem...)
 
Osman

Osman

Koul Khara!
#3,706
Aug 30, 2002
61,499
#3,706
I cant believe in one post, you have managed to say ridicolous stuff like first we should have a young unproven player who is fresh from Serie B instead of one of the best players in the league. And not to mention, Mancini, THE LEFT FORWARD, can be the solution to our RB and LB problems.
 
Alen

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
#3,707
Apr 2, 2007
53,941
#3,707
S.Giovinco said:
Alen, listen man.
juventus wont accept less then 12-13m for tiago, and tottenham WANT him.
blasi 1.7?
marchionni lets say- 5?(i dont know..)
almiron is playing very well in monaco , it wont be less then 5-6m i suggest.
so whats the probe? its like 22 without domenico!~



and btw, we got 60m to spent without counting what we might get from Anieli family, if theyll offer help.
Click to expand...
No, i was just mentioning what some newspaper wrote 2 days ago. They say we'll cover the 18m for Alonso with the money we'll get from these players.
As for Blasi, we sold the other 50% to Napoli some 2-3 days ago for 1.7m eur (some reported that we sold him for 1.5m)
 
gray

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
#3,715
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
#3,715
Cronios said:
-Because we wouldnt like to see our future sacrificed, for a promise that might or might not, deliver at the highest levels.
-Because we have real problems in our team and adding another forward isnt a priority. (HINT; look at our defense)
-Because Zampa was asking too much cash and our budget is limited!
-Because Amauri's presence would unbalance our team, he wouldnt easily accept sub status and he would ask for a very high salary, a salary that we are not paying to world class champions we have...

Thankfully though, it seems that we managed to wrap up a decent deal,
thats really surprising, considering the level of competence of our current managers!!
Click to expand...
I understand what you're saying, but you make it sound like signing Amauri will mean that we're directly sacrificing the future of our team. Let me remind you that Amauri still has a good 5 or 6 years or football left in him; it's not like we're signing Teddy Sheringham.

It's still early on in the transfer window, and so far we've done more than our rivals have done in the market, although the negotiations took an eternity. So signing Amauri doesn't mean that we're not going to strengthen our defence or midfield.

You're right about Amauri's salary demands, but Juve has a tendency to have a positive effect on players' mentalities, and hopefully he'll be able to find his place in the team.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Amauri's the best signing we could have made, but look at Iaquinta, look at Sissoko. At least give the lad a chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 31)