Alvaro Morata (63 Viewers)

[j0ker]

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

Whatever it takes to complain.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Lion]

it's simple/

when other clubs do it, it's great unless it milan or inter, but when juve do it it's bad.

see itrube deal. first complaing about speding 20 + million on a raw player, but then complaining that roma got him, and how much stronger it makes him

 

[Preet]

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

I don't think you can compare Giovinco's deal with Morata. 10M means nothing for Real, while those 7M meant much more to you guys.

 

[mabuchaq]

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

I think the fans are confused whether to hope he does well or not.
If he does and turns out be world class, Real will take him. If not, we lost 20M.

But realistically, a player to be considered world class by RM standards he has to be better than Higuain who they sold and as good as Benzema, it's highly unlikely that will happen.

 

[LiquidPLP]

it's simple/

when other clubs do it, it's great unless it milan or inter, but when juve do it it's bad.

see itrube deal. first complaing about speding 20 + million on a raw player, but then complaining that roma got him, and how much stronger it makes him

This is so true.

 

[fredrik]

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

Great question! Too bad it has too many words for the ppl, who it concerns, to grasp.

 

[mondo1]

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

Only difference that i See is that gio could have been of some use for us plus 7 mil means alot more for us than 10 mil for Real. Well Real will only get him back when he really is wc... If he is "just" a good player they will def go for some fancy signing

 

[Zacheryah]

it's simple/

when other clubs do it, it's great unless it milan or inter, but when juve do it it's bad.

see itrube deal. first complaing about speding 20 + million on a raw player, but then complaining that roma got him, and how much stronger it makes him

Oh yeah

Exactly those who were said he wasnt worth 20mil, now complement roma. its so hypocritical

- - - Updated - - -

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

I dont like Giovinco. i'll call him midged or cancerboy.

But when we sold him, i tought it was a good decision.
And he played such a good season at parma, it was a logical step for him to return

 

[DelPiero no10]

The only bad part about this signing is the buy back clause, its way to low. Some are underestimating the level of this boys potential. He's going to be a huge hit here and we'll regret the terms for a long time. He'll be a starter here this season.

 

[PedroFlu]

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

Both transactions deserve to be criticised, but not for what you said.

The criticism is on the fact that we overpayed for both players, as simple as that.

We bought Giovinco's half back for 11M, meaning he was valued 22M. Obviously overvalued.

Then we payed 20M for a kid who didn't play 1000 minutes for Madrid last season. It's less than 10 complete games. Great potential, very interesting skills, but highly unproven. I mean, Iturbe played a full season as a starter, it's pretty different. Even though Roma also overpayed for him.

I like Morata's potential a lot. But this does not takes back the fact that yes, we overpaid for him, and yes, we overpaid fo Giovinco. History proved this assessment of Giovinco's deal is completely correct. Let's see about Morata. Really hope he's worth it. But at the moment I consider 20M an over evaluation.

- - - Updated - - -

The only bad part about this signing is the buy back clause, its way to low. Some are underestimating the level of this boys potential. He's going to be a huge hit here and we'll regret the terms for a long time. He'll be a starter here this season.

People say that it's unlikely Madrid will want him back because they only go for the best.

But this is short sighted IMO. Madrid brought back Arbeloa, Callejon (a few years ago), now they want Negredo back, all for a very clear reason. They want solid rotation players/backups who are home grown and can be registred for Champions League.

It's no coincidence they are going for Negredo now.

I'm pretty sure they only let Morata go because he really wanted to leave.

I'm positive that in 2 years, if the kid does well, they will want to pay the 30M so he can be a great homegrown backup for whom they spent 10M for some team to develop.

Our great chance though lies on the fact that the kid really seem to be high on Juve. He seems to be ambitious, and seems to be the kind of guy who prefers to be very important in a top team than a backup in probably the biggest team of the world. I think that's what Marotta is thinking, about the kid's wish. And Madrid won't pay 30M if Morata doesn't want to go back.

But I believe the chances Madrid will push for him are very high, as long he confirms his potential. Then it will be up to him to go back or not. If he turns out to be really GREAT and actually stand a real chance to fight for a starting position at Madrid, I guess he'll go back.

 

[Linebreak]

If he does well he'll go back for a price fractionally higher than what we paid. If he does well he's going to want to go back to his childhood club no questions asked.

If he doesn't we would of wasted our money and would find him hard to offload.

Seems like a lose-lose for us.

 

[AlexOB]

Question:

How come selling Giovinco's half and later buying it back for 7m eur more was considered bad deal for Juve, while selling Morata for 20 with the possibility to buy him back for 30 is considered a great deal for Real.

If we now sell Berardi for 20m eur with possibility to buy him back in 2 years for 30m eur, will that be considered a great deal for Juve or will you bitches complain that we'll pay 10m eur for our own player?

Bingo.

see itrube deal. first complaing about speding 20 + million on a raw player, but then complaining that roma got him, and how much stronger it makes him

And bingo again.

Perfect picture of the situation.

More or less, two weeks of costant unstandable bitching and whining ridicolized in two posts.

 

[Xperd]

it's simple/

when other clubs do it, it's great unless it milan or inter, but when juve do it it's bad.

see itrube deal. first complaing about speding 20 + million on a raw player, but then complaining that roma got him, and how much stronger it makes him

Das it mane

 

[beowulf]

I think the fans are confused whether to hope he does well or not.
If he does and turns out be world class, Real will take him. If not, we lost 20M.

But realistically, a player to be considered world class by RM standards he has to be better than Higuain who they sold and as good as Benzema, it's highly unlikely that will happen.

In no circumstance would we end up losing the entire 20m. Worst, worst case is 10M loss.

 

[AlexOB]

The fact is that, perhaps, someone expected US (that, as you should know, are not big in money) to go to the European Champions and best and richest club in the world, fresh of silverware, to go there, pick up their best young homegrown talent, and Marotta to gangsta dictate our own rules. Yeah, nice story, but then there's reality.

Morata was a great chance for us, we need depth and freshness in attack and he's a right choice. Even if he's staying here just for 2 years, it is a great deal indeed, given that we are sure to receive 30M.

And someone forgets an important factor, doing bad their calculations.

The 20M payment is done in three years. Given that we'll pay the same amount in every installment, after two year we'll have payed more or less 12 milions, giving us a profit of 18 milions, more than the double, if they want to activate this re-buy option.

So, overall, IF this re-buy is activated, we'll have loaned Morata for 2 years (and he'll have done great things for us, if not he wouldn't be bought back) and being payed 18 millions for it. If we want to give for good that Morata will be happy to return at Madrid (hmm...) and that they won't be following the next shiny trending "big thang" instead of him.

But yeah, it is indeed, a bad deal.

 

[alexjuventino]

The fact is that, perhaps, someone expected US (that, as you should know, are not big in money) to go to the European Champions and best and richest club in the world, fresh of silverware, to go there, pick up their best young homegrown talent, and Marotta to gangsta dictate our own rules. Yeah, nice story, but then there's reality.

Morata was a great chance for us, we need depth and freshness in attack and he's a right choice. Even if he's staying here just for 2 years, it is a great deal indeed, given that we are sure to receive 30M.

And someone forgets an important factor, doing bad their calculations.

The 20M payment is done in three years. Given that we'll pay the same amount in every installment, after two year we'll have payed more or less 12 milions, giving us a profit of 18 milions, more than the double, if they want to activate this re-buy option.

So, overall, IF this re-buy is activated, we'll have loaned Morata for 2 years (and he'll have done great things for us, if not he wouldn't be bought back) and being payed 18 millions for it. If we want to give for good that Morata will be happy to return at Madrid (hmm...) and that they won't be following the next shiny trending "big thang" instead of him.

But yeah, it is indeed, a bad deal.

Really good post

 

[Trequartista]

The fact is that, perhaps, someone expected US (that, as you should know, are not big in money) to go to the European Champions and best and richest club in the world, fresh of silverware, to go there, pick up their best young homegrown talent, and Marotta to gangsta dictate our own rules. Yeah, nice story, but then there's reality.

Morata was a great chance for us, we need depth and freshness in attack and he's a right choice. Even if he's staying here just for 2 years, it is a great deal indeed, given that we are sure to receive 30M.

And someone forgets an important factor, doing bad their calculations.

The 20M payment is done in three years. Given that we'll pay the same amount in every installment, after two year we'll have payed more or less 12 milions, giving us a profit of 18 milions, more than the double, if they want to activate this re-buy option.

So, overall, IF this re-buy is activated, we'll have loaned Morata for 2 years (and he'll have done great things for us, if not he wouldn't be bought back) and being payed 18 millions for it. If we want to give for good that Morata will be happy to return at Madrid (hmm...) and that they won't be following the next shiny trending "big thang" instead of him.

But yeah, it is indeed, a bad deal.

 

[IliveForJuve]

The fact is that, perhaps, someone expected US (that, as you should know, are not big in money) to go to the European Champions and best and richest club in the world, fresh of silverware, to go there, pick up their best young homegrown talent, and Marotta to gangsta dictate our own rules. Yeah, nice story, but then there's reality.

Morata was a great chance for us, we need depth and freshness in attack and he's a right choice. Even if he's staying here just for 2 years, it is a great deal indeed, given that we are sure to receive 30M.

And someone forgets an important factor, doing bad their calculations.

The 20M payment is done in three years. Given that we'll pay the same amount in every installment, after two year we'll have payed more or less 12 milions, giving us a profit of 18 milions, more than the double, if they want to activate this re-buy option.

So, overall, IF this re-buy is activated, we'll have loaned Morata for 2 years (and he'll have done great things for us, if not he wouldn't be bought back) and being payed 18 millions for it. If we want to give for good that Morata will be happy to return at Madrid (hmm...) and that they won't be following the next shiny trending "big thang" instead of him.

But yeah, it is indeed, a bad deal.

Some people just like to see the glass half empty even when it's full.

 

[K.O.]

The fact is that, perhaps, someone expected US (that, as you should know, are not big in money) to go to the European Champions and best and richest club in the world, fresh of silverware, to go there, pick up their best young homegrown talent, and Marotta to gangsta dictate our own rules. Yeah, nice story, but then there's reality.

Morata was a great chance for us, we need depth and freshness in attack and he's a right choice. Even if he's staying here just for 2 years, it is a great deal indeed, given that we are sure to receive 30M.

And someone forgets an important factor, doing bad their calculations.

The 20M payment is done in three years. Given that we'll pay the same amount in every installment, after two year we'll have payed more or less 12 milions, giving us a profit of 18 milions, more than the double, if they want to activate this re-buy option.

So, overall, IF this re-buy is activated, we'll have loaned Morata for 2 years (and he'll have done great things for us, if not he wouldn't be bought back) and being payed 18 millions for it. If we want to give for good that Morata will be happy to return at Madrid (hmm...) and that they won't be following the next shiny trending "big thang" instead of him.

But yeah, it is indeed, a bad deal.

We need more of you. Please, post more.

 

[Bjerknes]

The fact is that, perhaps, someone expected US (that, as you should know, are not big in money) to go to the European Champions and best and richest club in the world, fresh of silverware, to go there, pick up their best young homegrown talent, and Marotta to gangsta dictate our own rules. Yeah, nice story, but then there's reality.

Morata was a great chance for us, we need depth and freshness in attack and he's a right choice. Even if he's staying here just for 2 years, it is a great deal indeed, given that we are sure to receive 30M.

And someone forgets an important factor, doing bad their calculations.

The 20M payment is done in three years. Given that we'll pay the same amount in every installment, after two year we'll have payed more or less 12 milions, giving us a profit of 18 milions, more than the double, if they want to activate this re-buy option.

So, overall, IF this re-buy is activated, we'll have loaned Morata for 2 years (and he'll have done great things for us, if not he wouldn't be bought back) and being payed 18 millions for it. If we want to give for good that Morata will be happy to return at Madrid (hmm...) and that they won't be following the next shiny trending "big thang" instead of him.

But yeah, it is indeed, a bad deal.

I like the Morata signing, but if he beats the odds and becomes world class, then we have resigned ourselves to a cheap transfer. Remember, Real can pay whatever for anything. It works both ways.